Development of a Lower-Limb Active Orthosis and a Walker for Gait Assistance

  • D. Sanz-Merodio
  • M. Cestari
  • J. C. Arevalo
  • X. Carrillo
  • E. Garcia
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 252)


Lower-limb exoskeletons and powered orthoses in gait assistance applications for patients with locomotive disorders possess the potential to significantly affect society in the near future. This paper presents the primary features of a lower-limb exoskeleton to enable paralysed children to walk. Because these patients are unable to move their limbs, the device generates their basic motions in everyday life, e.g., standing up, sitting down, and stable ambulation. A walker provides stability in the lateral plane, while the active orthosis provides stability in the sagittal plane while walking. The walker has been devised with a two degree of freedom mechanism to allow the user to sit down and stand up in a stable and comfortable way without the movement of the walker itself. The gait of the orthosis parameters such as step height, body height or step length are modified online, based on an impedance control approach, providing a safe and smooth gait pattern. Two shoe insole pressure measurement systems provide ground reaction force and center of pressure to adapt these gait parameters online. An adjustable compliance actuator has been designed and incorporated to the knee joint of the active orthosis. This Actuator with Adjustable Rigidity and Embedded Sensor (ARES) fulfills the demanding characteristics required in an active orthosis’s joint, namely, intrinsic compliance to allow human-machine interaction, high power-to-weight ratio, high peak torque, small size and low weight. Exploiting the characteristics of ARES actuator a control scheme has been designed and implemented to achieved a reduction in the energy expenditure while keeping compliant to accommodate unexpected disturbances. The final ATLAS exoskeleton has been successfully tested in a healthy user, in a quadriplegic child, and in a patient with neuromuscular disease.


Powered active orthosis Gait trajectory generation Exoskeleton Walker Energy consumption 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Mayr, A., Kofler, M., Quirbach, E., Matzak, H., Frhlich, K., Saltuari, L.: Prospective, blinded, randomized crossover study of gait rehabilitation in stroke patients using the lokomat gait orthosis. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 21(4), 307–314 (2007), CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vallery, H., van Asseldonk, E.H.F., Buss, M., van der Kooij, H.: Reference trajectory generation for rehabilitation robots: complementary limb motion estimation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 17(1), 23–30 (2009), CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    PhD, D.P.F., Msme, G.S.S., Mpt, A.R.D.: Powered lower limb orthoses for gait rehabilitation. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation 11(2), 34–49 (2005), CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fleischer, C.: Application of EMG signals for controlling exoskeleton robots. Biomed Tech 51, 314–319 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Suzuki, K., Mito, G., Kawamoto, H., Hasegawa, Y., Sankai, Y.: Intention-based walking support for paraplegia patients with robot suit HAL. Advanced Robotics 21(12), 1441–1469 (2007), Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee, S., Sankai, Y.: Power assist control for walking aid with HAL-3 based on EMG and impedance adjustment around knee joint. In: Intl. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Visser, L.C., Carloni, R., Stramigioli, S.: Variable stiffness actuators: A port-based analysis and a comparison of energy efficiency. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 3279–3284 (2010),
  8. 8.
    Craig, W.: Walker with lifting arms (August, 2005),
  9. 9.
    Garcia, E., Gonzalez de Santos, P.: On the improvement of walking performance in natural environments by a compliant adaptive gait. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 22(6), 1240–1253 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dollar, A.M., Herr, H.: Lower extremity exoskeletons and active orthoses: Challenges and state-of-the-art. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 24(1), 144–158 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jiang, W., Liu, A., Howard, D.: Optimization of legged robot locomotion by control of foot-force distribution. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 26(4), 311–323 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ferris, D.P., Sawicki, G.S., Domingo, A.R.: Powered lower limb orthoses for gait rehabilitation. Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation 11(2), 34 (2005), CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hurst, J.W., Chestnutt, J.E., Rizzi, A.A.: The actuator with mechanically adjustable series compliance. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 99, 1–10 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van Ham, R., Vanderborght, B., Van Damme, M., Verrelst, B., Lefeber, D.: MACCEPA, the mechanically adjustable compliance and controllable equilibrium position actuator: Design and implementation in a biped robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 55(10), 761–768 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wolf, S., Hirzinger, G.: A new variable stiffness design: Matching requirements of the next robot generation. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2008, pp. 1741–1746 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jafari, A., Tsagarakis, N.G., Vanderborght, B., Caldwell, D.G.: A novel actuator with adjustable stiffness (AwAS). In: 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 4201–4206 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sanz-Merodio, D., Cestari, M., Carlos, J., Garcia, E.: Control motion approach of a lower limb orthosis to reduce energy consumption. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 1 (2012),

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Sanz-Merodio
    • 1
  • M. Cestari
    • 1
  • J. C. Arevalo
    • 1
  • X. Carrillo
    • 1
  • E. Garcia
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Automation and RoboticsCSIC-UPMMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations