Advertisement

The Generative Mechanism Re-configuring Late Modernity

  • Margaret S. ArcherEmail author
Part of the Social Morphogenesis book series (SOCMOR)

Abstract

In this chapter a specific generative mechanism is advanced to account for the profound changes that have taken place since 1980. It derives from the enlarged pool of ‘contingent complementarities’ within the Cultural System and the exploitation of these complementary items to produce novel morphogenetic effects. The key institutions involved are, on the one hand, multinational and finance capitalism, and on the other, university based digital science. Symbiosis between them grows because market enterprises need to be increasingly competitive and digital science depends upon diffusion. Their synergy leads new variety to stimulate further variety. However, their situational logics are in mutual opposition: the zero-sum logic of market competition versus the diffusionists’ logic of opportunity fostering the ‘commons’, of which all are beneficiaries. This is the relational contestation of late modernity. The two logics promote divergent morphogenetic changes that steer the developing global social order in different directions. Market competition has resulted in the current crisis from which Third Sector initiatives cannot immediately extricated it – meaning we cannot yet speak of the advent of Morphogenic society.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility Generative Mechanism Social Order Social Enterprise Late Modernity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abbate, J. (1999). Inventing the internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Archer, M. S. (1979 [2013]). Social origins of educational systems. London/Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Archer, M. S. (1988). Culture and agency: The place of culture in social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Archer, M. S. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Archer, M. S. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Archer, M. S. (2007). Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Archer, M. S. (2012). The reflexive imperative in late modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Archer, M. S. (2013a). Introduction. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Social morphogenesis (Vol. 1, pp. 1–22). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Archer, M. S. (2013b). Morphogenetic society: Self-government and self-organization as misleading metaphors. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Social morphogenesis (Vol. I). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Archer, M. S., & Elder-Vass, D. (2011). Cultural system or norm circles?: An exchange. European Journal of Social Theory, 14, 1–23.Google Scholar
  12. Bailey, D. J. (2009). The political economy of European social democracy. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. P. (1964). Les Héritiers, les étudiants et la culture. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
  14. Castells, M. (2010 [2000]). The information age: Economy, society and culture (The rise of the network society, Vol. 1). Malden/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Centre d’Etudes Prospectives et d’Informations Internationales. (1992). L’Economie Mondiale 1990–2000: l’impératif de la croissance. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
  16. Corning, P. A. (1998). The synergism hypothesis: On the concept of synergy and it’s role in the evolution of complex systems. Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 21(2), 133–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Donati, P. (1983). Introduzione alla sociologia relazionale. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  18. Donati, P. (1991). Teoria relazionale della società. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  19. Donati, P., & Colozzi, I. (Eds.). (2006). Il Paradigma Relazionale nelle Scienze Sociali: le prospettive sociologiche. Bologna: Mulino.Google Scholar
  20. Donati, P., & Colozzi, I. (Eds.). (2007). Terzo settore, mondi vitali e capital sociale in Italia. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  21. Ecoislands Accord. (2012). http://www.ecoislands.org/about-us/our-vision/. Accessed Nov 2012.
  22. Elliott, A., & Lemert, C. (2006). The new individualism: The emotional costs of globalization. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Forbes, R. J. (1958). Power to 1850. In C. Singer et~al. (Eds.), A history of technology (The industrial revolution, c. 1750 to c. 1850, Vol. 4). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  24. Gerth, H. H., & Wright Mills, C. (1967). From Max Weber. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  25. Gorski, P. (2009). Social “mechanisms” and comparative-historical sociology: A critical realist proposal. In P. Hedström & B. Wittrock (Eds.), Frontiers of sociology (pp. 160–162). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  26. Heelas, P., Lash, S., & Morris, P. (Eds.). (1996). Detraditionalization. Oxford: Blackwell-Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Himannen, P. (2001). The hackers’ ethic and the spirit of informationalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Jewkes, J., Sawers, D., & Stillerman, R. (1969). The sources of invention. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  29. Kitschelt, H. (1994). The transformation of European social democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lawson, T. (2013). Emergence and morphogenesis: Causal reduction and downward causation. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Social morphogenesis (Vol. I). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Luhmann, N. (1982). The differentiation of society. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Malone, M. S. (1985). The big score: The billion-dollar story of silicon valley. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  33. Merton, R. K. (1973). The normative structure of science. In R. K. Merton (Ed.), The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mulkay, M. J. (1972). The social process of innovation. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. Porpora, D. V. (1989). Four concepts of social structure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 19, 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Porpora, D. V. (2011). Recovering causality. In A. Maccarini, E. Morandi, & R. Prandini (Eds.), Sociological realism (pp. 160–161). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Prost, A. (1968). L’Enseignement en France, 1800–1967. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  38. Rogers, E. M., & Larsen, J. K. (1984). Silicon valley fever: Growth of high technology culture. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  39. Rosa, H. (2003). Social acceleration: Ethical and political consequences of a desynchronized high-speed society. Constellations, 10(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith, A. (1904). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations (Cannan edition). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  41. Social Stock Exchange UK. (2012). http://www.socialenterpriselive.com/section/social-investment/money/20111228/uk. Accessed Nov 2012.
  42. Stiglitz, J. (2005). The roaring nineties. New York/London: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  43. Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. (2008). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  44. Vittadini, G. (2008). Organizations acting in a subsidiary way in civil society (the case of the ‘Food Bank’). In M. S. Archer & P. Donati (Eds.), Pursuing the common good: How solidarity and subsidiarity can work together. Vatican City: Vatican Press.Google Scholar
  45. Wilke, H. (2003). Heterotopia. Studien zur Krisis der Ordnung moderner Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  46. Wilke, H. (2013). Complex governance and Europe’s model of subsidiarity. In M. S. Archer & A. Maccarini (Eds.), Engaging with the world: Agency, institutions, historical formations. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations