Early Vehicle Accident Detection and Notification Based on Smartphone Technology
Prompt assistance to people involved in vehicle accidents could make a significant difference on the consequences of such accidents. Some vehicle manufacturers include technology embedded into the vehicles they build to detect and communicate crash vehicle events to emergency agencies. Nevertheless, this approach adds cost to the vehicles, and as it is only present at a small proportion of vehicles in most urban settings. Nowadays, most cell phones are equipped with a diversity of sensors, including accelerometers, GPS units, microphones, among others, which present an opportunity for these devices to be used, while carried by people, as both sensors for vehicle accidents and remote notification of such events. By means of simulations, this article presents encouraging results regarding using smartphones for vehicle crash detection. The main conclusion presented is that a model for early detection of vehicle accidents has been elaborated and preliminary proved.
KeywordsSensors Vehicle Accident Smartphone
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Peden, R., Scurfield, R.: World Health Organization. World Report on road Traffic Injury Prevention (2004)Google Scholar
- 3.Farris, P.: General Motors OnStar (2008)Google Scholar
- 4.Bekiaris, E.D., Spadoni, A., Nikolaou, S.I.: SAFERIDER Project: new safety and comfort in Powered Two Wheelers. In: 2nd Conference on Human System Interactions, HSI 2009. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
- 5.Montanari, R., Borin, A., Spadoni, A.: SAFERIDER: results from Yamaha test site on advanced rider assistance system. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCHI Italian Chapter International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Facing Complexity, pp. 132–138. ACM, New York (2011)Google Scholar
- 6.Smith, A.: 46% of American adults are smartphone owners. Pew Internet & American Life Project (2012), http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Smartphone-Update-2012/Findings.aspx (accessed April 27, 2012)
- 7.Fan, Y., Chen, Q., Liao, C.F., Douma, F.: UbiActive: Smartphone-Based Tool for Trip Detection and Travel-Related Physical Activity Assessment. Submitted for Presentation at the Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting (2012)Google Scholar
- 8.McAffer, J., Lemieux, J., Aniszczyk, C.: Eclipse rich client platform. Addison-Wesley Professional (2010)Google Scholar
- 9.Lee, S., Diez, E.: A Comparative Analysis of Latin NCAP to Global NCAPs. In: Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting. No. 13-1397 (2013)Google Scholar
- 10.Mohan, P., Padmanabhan, V.N., Ramjee, R.: Nericell: rich monitoring of road and traffic conditions using mobile smartphones. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
- 12.Fogue, M., Garrido, P., Martinez, F.J., Cano, J.C., Calafate, C.T., Manzoni, P., Sanchez, M.: Prototyping an automatic notification scheme for traffic accidents in vehicular networks. In: 2011 IFIP Wireless Days (WD). IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
- 13.Barba, C.T., Mateos, M.A., Soto, P.R., Mezher, A.M., Igartua, M.A.: Smart city for VANETs using warning messages, traffic statistics and intelligent traffic lights. In: Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
- 16.af Wåhlberg, A. E.: Characteristics of low speed accidents with buses in public transport. Accident Analysis & Prevention 34(5), 637–647 (2002)Google Scholar