Providing Adaptive Visual Interface Feedback in Massively Multiplayer Online Games

  • Chris Deaker
  • Masood Masoodian
  • Bill Rogers
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8253)


Massively multiplayer online role-playing games typically feature rich and complex game environments to provide more engaging game-play experiences. The complexity of the underlying system in such games can however result in increased complexity of their interfaces, which may diminish player enjoyment—a major element of players’ game experience. Players may customise their in-game interfaces to deal with this type of complexity and hence improve their performance, but the challenges associated with manual interface customisation may prevent some players from effectively personalising their own game interface. In this paper we present an adaptive feedback system with a visual interface component, which dynamically provides the player with a list of predicted actions they are likely to take, in order to simplify the game interface and improve players’ game experience. We also report on the outcomes of a user evaluation of this system which demonstrate the potential value of adaptive user interfaces in game design.


Adaptive game interfaces visual interface feedback feedback visualisation massively multiplayer online games user evaluation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bartle, R.: Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit muds. The Journal of Virtual Environments 1(1) (1996)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bryant, B.D., Miikkulainen, R.: Acquiring visibly intelligent behavior with example-guided neuroevolution. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, pp. 801–808. AAAI Press (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Charles, D., Kerr, A., McNeill, M., McAlister, M., Black, M., Kcklich, J., Moore, A., Stringer, K.: Player-centred game design: Player modelling and adaptive digital games. In: Proceedings of the Digital Games Research Conference, pp. 285–298 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cowley, B., Charles, D., Black, M., Hickey, R.: Toward an understanding of flow in video games. Computers in Entertainment (CIE) 6(2), Article No. 20 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M., Csikszentmihalyi, I.: Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge University Press (1992)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deaker, C., Masoodian, M., Rogers, B.: A survey of players’ opinions on interface customization in world of warcraft. In: Nijholt, A., Romão, T., Reidsma, D. (eds.) ACE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7624, pp. 198–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Markov, A.: Extension of the limit theorems of probability theory to a sum of variables connected in a chain. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1971)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Togelius, J., Nardi, R.D., Lucas, S.M.: Towards automatic personalised content creation for racing games. In: IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games, pp. 252–259. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoorn, N.V., Togelius, J., Wierstra, D., Schmidhuber, J.: Robust player imitation using multiobjective evolution. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 652–659. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yee, N.: Motivations of play in online games. Journal of CyberPsychology and Behavior 9(6), 772–775 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Deaker
    • 1
  • Masood Masoodian
    • 1
  • Bill Rogers
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceThe University of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations