Bayesian Network Based Heuristic for Energy Aware EEG Signal Classification

  • Abduljalil Mohamed
  • Khaled Bashir Shaban
  • Amr Mohamed
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8211)

Abstract

A major challenge in the current research of wireless electroencephalograph (EEG) sensor-based medical or Brain Computer Interface applications is how to classify EEG signals as accurately and energy efficient as possible. One way to achieve this objective is to select a subset of the most discriminant EEG channels during the signal classification. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian network based-heuristic channel selection approach. First, the EEG channels are ranked based on their task discriminant capabilities. The highest task-related channels are chosen as an initial set. Subsequently, this set is submitted to a Bayesian network to calculate the task weights. Based on these weights, the heuristic algorithm is either selects an appropriate channel or ends the selection process. The proposed technique has been applied on two classification problems. It achieved 92% and 93.39% classification accuracies, utilizing only 6 out of 14 channels and 13 out of 64 channels, respectively.

Keywords

Brain Computer Interface EEG signal classification EEG channel and feature selection Bayesian network mental task classification 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Honal, M., Schultz, T.: Identifying User State using Electroencephalographic Data. In: Proceedings of ICMI 2005 Workshop, Trento, Italy (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bashashati, A., Fatourechi, M., Ward, R.K., Birch, G.E.: A Survey of Signal Processing Algorithms in Brain-Computer Interfaces based on Electrical Brain Signals. Neural Engineering 4(2), R32 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mohamed, A., Shaban, K.B., Mohamed, A.: Evidence Theory-based Approach for Epileptic Seizure Detection using EEG Signals. In: 21st IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, pp. 79–85. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hanson, M.A., Powell, H.C., Barth, A.T., Ringgenberg, K., Calhoun, B.H., Aylor, J.H., Lach, J.: Body Area Sensor Networks: Challenges and Opportunities. Computer 42, 58–65 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marinkovic, S.J., Popovici, E.M., Spagnol, C., Faul, S., Marnane, W.P.: Energy-Efficient Low Duty Cycle MAC Protocol for Wireless Body Area Networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 13(6), 915–925 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reusens, E., Joseph, W., Latre, B., Barem, B., Vermeeren, G., Tanghe, E., Blondia, C.: Characterization of On-body Communication Channel and Energy Efficient Topology Design for Wireless Body Area Networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 13(6), 933–945 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Omeni, O., Wong, A., Burdett, A.J., Toumazou, C.: Energy Efficient Medium Access Protocol for Wireless Medical Body Area Sensor Networks. IEEETransactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems 2(4), 251–259 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daly, D.C., Anantha, P.C.: An Energy-Efficient OOK Transceiver for Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Journal of Solid-state Circuits 42(5), 1003–1011 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kohavi, R., George, H.J.: Wrappers for Feature Subset Selection. Artificial Intelligence 97(1), 273–324 (1997)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ong, K., Thung, K., Wee, C., Paramesran, R.: Selection of a Subset of EEG Channels using PCA to Classify Alcoholics and None-alcoholics. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE 27th Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Shanghai, China (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Emotiv-Systems. Emotiv-Brain Computer Interface Technology, http://emotiv.com
  12. 12.
    Campbell, A., Choudhury, T., Hu, S., Lu, H., Mukerjee, M.K., Rabbi, M., Raizada, R.D.: NeuroPhone: Brain-Mobile Phone Interface using a Wireless EEG Headset. In: Proceedings of the Second ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Networking, Systems, and Applications on Mobile Handhelds, pp. 3–8. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Faradji, F., Ward, R.K., Birch, G.E.: Toward Development of a Two-State Brain–Computer Interface based on Mental Tasks. Journal of Neural Engineering 8(4) (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mierswa, I., Wurst, M., Klinkenberg, R., Scholz, M., Euler, T.: Yale: Rapid Prototyping for Complex Data Mining Tasks. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 935–940. ACM (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abduljalil Mohamed
    • 1
  • Khaled Bashir Shaban
    • 1
  • Amr Mohamed
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science and Engineering Department, College of EngineeringQatar UniversityDohaQatar

Personalised recommendations