1940–1959

  • Kenneth J. Berry
  • Janis E. Johnston
  • Paul W. MielkeJr.
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter chronicles the development of permutation statistical methods from 1940 to 1959. This period may be considered a bridge between the early years of 1920–1939 where permutation tests were first conceptualized and the next period, 1960–1979, in which gains in computer technology provided the necessary tools to successfully employ permutation tests. The recognition of permutation methods as the gold standard against which conventional statistical methods were to be evaluated, while often implicit in the 1920s and 1930s, is manifest in many of the publications on permutation methods that appeared between 1940 and 1959. Also, a number of researchers turned their attention during this time period to rank tests, which simplified the calculation of exact probability values; other researchers continued work on calculating exact probability values, creating tables for small samples; and still others continued the theoretical work begun in the 1920s.

References

  1. 8.
    Agresti, A., Wackerly, D., Boyett, J.M.: Exact conditional tests for cross-classifications: Approximation of attained significance levels. Psychometrika 44, 75–83 (1979)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 9.
    Ahlswede, R.: Jacob Wolfowitz (1910–1981). http://www.ifp.illinois.edu/~junchen/jacob_wolfowitz.htm (1981). Accessed 19 Jan 2012
  3. 23.
    Anonymous: Dr P. H. Leslie. Nature 239, 477–478 (1972)Google Scholar
  4. 24.
    Anonymous: Former RSS honorary secretary, Sidney Rosenbaum, dies. RSSeNews. http://www.rssenews.org.uk/2013/03/former-rss-honorary-secretary-sidney-rosenbaum-dies (20 March 2013). Accessed 9 June 2013
  5. 25.
    Anonymous: Turing top secret. Significance 9, 3 (June 2012)Google Scholar
  6. 34.
    Armsen, P.: Tables for significance tests of 2 × 2 contingency tables. Biometrika 42, 494–511 (1955)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 38.
    Asimov, N.: Erich L. Lehmann — Berkeley professor — dies. San Francisco Chronicle, pp. D–8. http://www.sfgate.com/science/article/Erich-L-Lehmann-Berkeley-professor-dies-3214326.php (16 October 2009). Accessed 9 Sept 2010
  8. 39.
    Askey, R.: The 1839 paper on permutations: Its relation to the Rodrigues formula and further developments. In: Altman, S., Ortiz E.L. (eds.) Mathematics and Social Utopias in France: Olinde Rodrigues and His Times, vol. 28, History of Mathematics, pp. 105–118. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 40.
    Auble, D.: Extended tables for the Mann–Whitney statistic. B. Inst. Educ. Res. Ind. 1, 1–39 (1953)Google Scholar
  10. 41.
    Augarten, S.: Bit by Bit: An Illustrated History of Computers. Ticknor & Fields, New York. http://ds.haverford.edu/bitbybit/bit-by-bit-contents/chapter-five/5-8-the-ias-computer/ (1984). Accessed 7 Apr 2013
  11. 42.
    Babington Smith, C.: Evidence in Camera: The Story of Photographic Intelligence in World War II. David & Charles, London (1957)Google Scholar
  12. 43.
    Bacaër, N.: The Leslie matrix. In: A Short History of Mathematical Population Dynamics, chap. 21, pp. 117–120. Springer, London (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 44.
    Backus, J.: The history of FORTRAN I, II, and III. ACM SIGPLAN Notices 13, 165–180 (1978)Google Scholar
  14. 51.
    Baker, F.B., Collier, Jr., R.O.: Monte Carlo F-II: A computer program for analysis of variance F-tests by means of permutation. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 26, 169–173 (1966)Google Scholar
  15. 52.
    Baker, F.B., Collier, Jr., R.O.: Some empirical results on variance ratios under permutation in the completely randomized design. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 61, 813–820 (1966)Google Scholar
  16. 53.
    Baker, F.B., Hubert, L.J.: Inference procedures for ordering theory. J. Educ. Stat. 2, 217–232 (1977)Google Scholar
  17. 63.
    Barnard, G.A.: A new test for 2 × 2 tables. Nature 156, 177 (1945)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 64.
    Barnard, G.A.: A new test for 2 × 2 tables. Nature 156, 783–784 (1945)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 67.
    Barnard, G.A.: Significance tests for 2 × 2 tables. Biometrika 34, 123–138 (1947)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 68.
    Barnard, G.A.: Statistical inference. J. R. Stat. Soc. B Met. 11, 115–149 (1949)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 70.
    Barnard, G.A.: Discussion of “Tests of significance in 2 × 2 tables” by F. Yates. J. R. Stat. Soc. A Gen. 147, 449–450 (1984)Google Scholar
  22. 72.
    Barnard, G.A.: Discussion of “A new probability model for determining exact P-values for 2 × 2 contingency tables when comparing binomial proportions” by W.R. Rice. Biometrics 44, 16–18 (1988)Google Scholar
  23. 100.
    Bergmann, R., Ludbrook, J., Spooren, W.P.J.M.: Different outcomes of the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test from different statistics packages. Am. Stat. 54, 72–77 (2000)Google Scholar
  24. 111.
    Berry, K.J., Johnston, J.E., Mielke, P.W.: Exact goodness-of-fit tests for unordered equiprobable categories. Percept. Motor Skill 98, 909–918 (2004)Google Scholar
  25. 155.
    Berry, K.J., Mielke, P.W.: Exact and Monte Carlo resampling procedures for the Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Percept. Motor Skill. 91, 749–754 (2000)Google Scholar
  26. 160.
    Berry, K.J., Mielke, P.W., Johnston, J.E.: The two-sample rank-sum test: early development. Elec. J. Hist. Prob. Stat. 8, 1–26 (2012)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. 165.
    Beyer, K.W.: Grace Hopper and the Invention of the Information Age. MIT Press, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 180.
    Boothroyd, J.: Algorithm 29: Permutations of the elements of a vector. Comput. J. 10, 310–311 (1967)Google Scholar
  29. 181.
    Boothroyd, J.: Algorithm 30: Fast permutation of the elements of a vector. Comput. J. 10, 311–312 (1967)Google Scholar
  30. 188.
    Bowen, J.: Alan Turing. In: Robinson, A. (ed.) The Scientists: An Epic of Discovery, pp. 270–275. Thames & Hudson, London (2012)Google Scholar
  31. 190.
    Box, G.E.P.: Non-normality and tests on variances. Biometrika 40, 318–335 (1953)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  32. 192.
    Box, G.E.P.: An Accidental Statistician: The Life and Memories of George E. P. Box. Wiley, New York (2013) [Also inscribed “With a little help from my friend, Judith L. Allen”]Google Scholar
  33. 193.
    Box, G.E.P., Andersen, S.L.: Permutation theory in the derivation of robust criteria and the study of departures from assumption (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. B Met. 17, 1–34 (1955)MATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 200.
    Bradbury, I.: Analysis of variance versus randomization — a comparison. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 40, 177–187 (1987)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. 203.
    Bradley, R.A.: Frank Wilcoxon. Biometrics 22, 192–194 (1966)MATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 205.
    Bradley, R.A., Hollander, M.: Wilcoxon, Frank. In: Heyde, C.C., Seneta, E. (eds.) Statisticians of the Centuries, pp. 420–424. Springer, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  37. 206.
    Bratley, P.: Algorithm 306: Permutations with repetitions. Commun. ACM 7, 450–451 (1967)Google Scholar
  38. 215.
    Brillinger, D.R.: Erich Leo Lehmann, 1917 – 2009. J. R. Stat. Soc. A Stat 173, 683–689 (2010)Google Scholar
  39. 221.
    Brooks, E.B.: Frank Wilcoxon, 2 Sept 1892 – 18 Nov 1965. Tales of Statisticians. http://www.umass.edu/wsp/statistics/tales/wilcoxon.html. Accessed 1 Apr 2012
  40. 229.
    Burr, E.J.: The distribution of Kendall’s score S for a pair of tied rankings. Biometrika 47, 151–171 (1960)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  41. 237.
    Cajori, F.: History of symbols for \(\underline{\text{n}}\) = factorial. Isis 3, 414–418 (1921)Google Scholar
  42. 239.
    Campbell, I.: Chi-squared and Fisher–Irwin tests of two-by-two tables with small sample recommendations. Stat. Med. 26, 3661–3675 (2007)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  43. 240.
    Campbell-Kelly, M.: John von Neumann. In: Robinson, A. (ed.) The Scientists: An Epic of Discovery, pp. 276–279. Thames & Hudson, London (2012)Google Scholar
  44. 247.
    Chase, P.J.: Algorithm 382: Combinations of M out of N objects. Commun. ACM 13, 368–369 (1970)Google Scholar
  45. 248.
    Chase, P.J.: Algorithm 383: Permutations of a set with repetitions. Commun. ACM 13, 368–369 (1970)Google Scholar
  46. 254.
    Chung, J.H., Fraser, D.A.S.: Randomization tests for a multivariate two-sample problem. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 53, 729–735 (1958)MATHGoogle Scholar
  47. 274.
    Conroy, R.M.: What hypotheses do “nonparametric” two-group tests actually test? Stata J. 12, 182–190 (2012)Google Scholar
  48. 298.
    Crowcroft, P.: Elton’s Ecologists: A History of the Bureau of Animal Population. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1991)Google Scholar
  49. 313.
    Daniel, W.W.: Applied Nonparametric Statistics. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1978)MATHGoogle Scholar
  50. 314.
    Daniels, H.E.: Rank correlation and population models (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. B Met. 12, 171–191 (1950)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  51. 323.
    David, H.A.: First (?) occurrence of common terms in mathematical statistics. Am. Stat. 49, 121–133 (1995)Google Scholar
  52. 325.
    David, H.A.: Samuel Stanley Wilks (1906–1964). Am. Stat. 60, 46–49 (2006)Google Scholar
  53. 328.
    David, S.T., Kendall, M.G., Stuart, A.: Some questions of distribution in the theory of rank correlation. Biometrika 38, 131–140 (1951)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  54. 332.
    Defining a legend. University of Wisconsin Foundation Insights. http://www.supportuw.org/wp-content/uploads/insights_04_fall.pdf (Fall 2004). Accessed 20 June 2013
  55. 334.
    de Montmort, P.R.: Essay d’Analyse sur les Jeux de Hazard (Analytical Essay on Gambling). Quillau, Paris (1708)Google Scholar
  56. 335.
    de Wet, T.: Statistics in the fifties. South African Statistical Association (2003) [Presidential Address on the 50th Anniversary of the South African Statistical Association, Johannesburg, 2003 by Tertius de Wet]Google Scholar
  57. 336.
    DeGroot, M.H.: A conversation with Charles Stein. Stat. Sci. 1, 454–462 (1986)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  58. 337.
    DeGroot, M.H.: A conversation with Erich L. Lehmann. Stat. Sci. 1, 243–258 (1986)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  59. 338.
    DeGroot, M.H.: A conversation with George Box. Stat. Sci. 2, 239–258 (1987)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  60. 339.
    DeGroot, M.H.: A conversation with George A. Bernard. Stat. Sci. 3, 196–212 (1988)Google Scholar
  61. 344.
    Dershowitz, N.: A simplified loop-free algorithm for generating permutations. BIT 15, 158–164 (1975)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  62. 345.
    Deuchler, G.: Über die Methoden der Korrelationsrechnung in der Pädagogik und Psychologie. Z. Padagog. Psychol. Exp. Padagog. 15, 114–131, 145–159, and 229–242 (1914)Google Scholar
  63. 353.
    Dixon, W.J.: A criterion for testing the hypothesis that two samples are from the same population. Ann. Math. Stat. 11, 199–204 (1940)Google Scholar
  64. 359.
    Doolen, G.D., Hendricks, J.: Monte Carlo at work. Los Alamos Sci. 15, 142–143 (1987)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  65. 363.
    Dunnett, C.W.: Frank Wilcoxon, 1892–1965. Technometrics 8, 195–196 (1966)MATHGoogle Scholar
  66. 365.
    Dupont, W.D.: Reply to Comment on “Sensitivity of Fisher’s exact test to minor perturbations in 2 × 2 contingency tables” by A. Martín Andrés and J.D. Luna del Castillo. Stat. Med. 8, 244–245 (1989)Google Scholar
  67. 368.
    Dwass, M.: Modified randomization tests for nonparametric hypotheses. Ann. Math. Stat. 28, 181–187 (1957)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  68. 370.
    Dyson, G.: Turing’s Cathedral: The Origins of the Digital Universe. Pantheon/Vintage, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  69. 372.
    Eckhardt, R.: Stan Ulam, John von Neumann, and the Monte Carlo method. Los Alamos Sci. 15, 131–137 (1987)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  70. 379.
    Eden, T., Yates, F.: On the validity of Fisher’s z test when applied to an actual example of non-normal data. J. Agric. Sci. 23, 6–17 (1933)Google Scholar
  71. 399.
    Edwards, A.W.F.: Pascal’s Arithmetical Triangle. Griffin, London (1987)MATHGoogle Scholar
  72. 400.
    Edwards, A.W.F.: Professor C. A. B. Smith, 1917–2002. J. R. Stat. Soc. D Stat. 51, 404–405 (2002)Google Scholar
  73. 401.
    Edwards, A.W.F.: Fisher computes…. Significance 9, 44 (2012) [Letter to the editor regarding an article by Fisher in Significance, August 2012]Google Scholar
  74. 406.
    Churchill Eisenhart, statistics expert. NY Times. http://www.nytimes.com/1994/07/01/us/churchill-eisenhart-statistics-expert-82.html (1 July 1994). Accessed 20 Jan 2012
  75. 413.
    Ernst, M.D.: Permutation methods: A basis for exact inference. Stat. Sci. 19, 676–685 (2004)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  76. 421.
    Feinstein, A.R.: Clinical Biostatistics XXIII: The role of randomization in sampling, testing, allocation, and credulous idolatry (Part 2). Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 14, 898–915 (1973)Google Scholar
  77. 426.
    Ferry, G.: A Computer Called LEO. HarperCollins, London (2004)Google Scholar
  78. 427.
    Festinger, L.: The significance of differences between means without reference to the frequency distribution function. Psychometrika 11, 97–105 (1946)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  79. 429.
    Fienberg, S.E., Stigler, S.M., Tanur, J.M.: The William Kruskal legacy: 1919–2005. Stat. Sci. 22, 255–261 (2007)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  80. 434.
    Finney, D.J.: The Fisher–Yates test of significance in 2 × 2 contingency tables. Biometrika 35, 145–156 (1948)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  81. 435.
    Finney, D.J.: A numerate life. In: Gani, J. (ed.) The Making of Statisticians, pp. 150–164. Springer, New York (1982)Google Scholar
  82. 448.
    Fisher, R.A.: Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh (1925)Google Scholar
  83. 451.
    Fisher, R.A.: The Design of Experiments. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh (1935)Google Scholar
  84. 452.
    Fisher, R.A.: The logic of inductive inference (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. 98, 39–82 (1935)Google Scholar
  85. 457.
    Fisher, R.A.: A new test for 2 × 2 tables. Nature 156, 388 (1945)Google Scholar
  86. 458.
    Fisher, R.A.: Gene frequencies in a cline determined by selection and diffusion. Biometrics 6, 353–361 (1950)Google Scholar
  87. 465.
    Fix, E., Hodges, J.L.: Significance probabilities of the Wilcoxon test. Ann. Math. Stat. 26, 301–312 (1955)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  88. 472.
    Flournoy, N.: A conversation with Wilfrid J. Dixon. Stat. Sci. 8, 458–477 (1993)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  89. 473.
    Flournoy, N.: Wilfrid Joseph Dixon, 1915–2008. J. R. Stat. Soc. A Stat. 173, 455–456 (2010)Google Scholar
  90. 475.
    Følling, A.: The excretion of phenylpyruvic acid in the urine, an anomaly of metabolism in connection with imbecility. Z. Physiol. Chem. 227, 169–176 (1934)Google Scholar
  91. 480.
    Freeman, G.H., Halton, J.H.: Note on an exact treatment of contingency, goodness of fit and other problems of significance. Biometrika 38, 141–149 (1951)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  92. 485.
    Friedman, M.: The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 32, 675–701 (1937)Google Scholar
  93. 486.
    Friedman, M.: A comparison of alternative tests of significance for the problem of m rankings. Ann. Math. Stat. 11, 86–92 (1940)Google Scholar
  94. 502.
    Gebhard, J., Schmitz, N.: Permutation tests — a revival?! I. Optimum properties. Stat. Pap. 39, 75–85 (1998)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  95. 505.
    Gelman, A.: Tables as graphs: The Ramanujan principle. Significance 8, 183 (December 2011)Google Scholar
  96. 510.
    Ghent, A.W.: A method for exact testing of 2 × 2, 2 × 3, 3 × 3, and other contingency tables, employing binomial coefficients. Am. Midl. Nat. 88, 15–27 (1972)Google Scholar
  97. 523.
    Good, P.I.: Permutation Tests: A Practical Guide to Resampling Methods for Testing Hypotheses. Springer, New York (1994)MATHGoogle Scholar
  98. 529.
    Good, P.I.: Efficiency comparisons of rank and permutation tests by Janice M. Weinberg and Stephen W. Lagakos in Statistics in Medicine 2001; 20:705–731. Stat. Med. 23, 857 (2004)Google Scholar
  99. 556.
    Grier, D.A.: Statistics and the introduction of digital computers. Chance 4, 30–36 (1991)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  100. 558.
    Griffin, H.D.: Graphic computation of tau as a coefficient of disarray. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 53, 441–447 (1958)MATHGoogle Scholar
  101. 562.
    Guide to the Meyer Dwass (1923–1996) papers. Northwestern University Library. http://findingaids.library.northwestern.edu/catalog/inu-ead-nua-archon-548 (2002). Accessed 19 Jan 2012
  102. 566.
    Hack, H.R.B.: An empirical investigation into the distribution of the F-ratio in samples from two non-normal populations. Biometrika 45, 260–265 (1958)MATHGoogle Scholar
  103. 569.
    Haden, H.G.: A note on the distribution of the different orderings of n objects. Math. Proc. Cambridge 43, 1–9 (1947)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  104. 573.
    Haldane, J.B.S., Smith, C.A.B.: A simple exact test for birth-order effect. Ann. Eugenic. 14, 117–124 (1948)Google Scholar
  105. 578.
    Halton, J.H.: A rigorous derivation of the exact contingency formula. Math. Proc. Cambridge 65, 527–530 (1969)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  106. 579.
    Halton, J.H.: A retrospective and prospective survey of the Monte Carlo method. SIAM Rev. 12, 1–63 (1970)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  107. 580.
    Hamilton, A.: Brains that click. Pop. Mech. 91, 162–167, 256, 258 (1949)Google Scholar
  108. 585.
    Hardy, G.H., Ramanujan, S.: Asymptotic formulae in combinatory analysis. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 17, 75–115 (1918)Google Scholar
  109. 602.
    Hayes, B.: The memristor. Am. Sci. 99, 106–110 (2011)Google Scholar
  110. 610.
    Hemelrijk, J.: Note on Wilcoxon’s two-sample test when ties are present. Ann. Math. Stat. 23, 133–135 (1952)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  111. 615.
    Higgon, K.: Rosenbaum, Dr Sidney (b 1918). Liddell Hart Centre for Military Archives, King’s College London. http://www.kingscollections.org/catalogues/lhcma/collection/p-t/ro75-001 (2007). Accessed 6 Dec 2012
  112. 618.
    Hilbe, J.M.: The coevolution of statistics and HZ. In: Sawilowsky, S.S. (ed.) Real Data Analysis, pp. 3–20. Information Age, Charlotte (2007)Google Scholar
  113. 621.
    Hill, I.D.: Discussion of “A new probability model for determining exact P-values for 2 × 2 contingency tables when comparing binomial proportions” by W.R. Rice. Biometrics 44, 14–16 (1988)Google Scholar
  114. 636.
    Hoeffding, W.: The large-sample power of tests based on permutations of observations. Ann. Math. Stat. 23, 169–192 (1952)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  115. 639.
    Hollander, M.: A conversation with Ralph A. Bradley. Stat. Sci. 16, 75–100 (2000)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  116. 652.
    Hotelling, H.: The generalization of Student’s ratio. Ann. Math. Stat. 2, 360–378 (1931)Google Scholar
  117. 653.
    Hotelling, H., Pabst, M.R.: Rank correlation and tests of significance involving no assumption of normality. Ann. Math. Stat. 7, 29–43 (1936)Google Scholar
  118. 654.
    Householder, A.S., Forsythe, G.E., Germond, H.H. (eds.): Monte Carlo Methods. No. 12 in National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (1951)Google Scholar
  119. 673.
    In Memoriam: Dr. Colin White. Yale Univ. News. http://news.yale.edu/2011/03/14/memoriam-dr-colin-white (2011). Accessed 31 Mar 2012
  120. 674.
    Irwin, J.O.: Tests of significance for differences between percentages based on small numbers. Metron 12, 83–94 (1935)Google Scholar
  121. 675.
    Ives, F.W.: Permutation enumeration: Four new permutation algorithms. Commun. ACM 19, 68–72 (1976)MATHGoogle Scholar
  122. 677.
    Jacobson, J.E.: The Wilcoxon two-sample statistic: Tables and bibliography. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58, 1086–1103 (1963)MATHGoogle Scholar
  123. 681.
    Jarrett, T.: On algebraic notation. Trans. Camb. Philos. Soc. 3, 65–103 (1830)Google Scholar
  124. 683.
    Jenkins, N.: W. H. Auden–‘Family Ghosts’. Department of English, Stanford University. http://www.stanford.edu/group/auden/cgi-bin/auden (2008). Accessed 6 Feb 2012
  125. 690.
    Johnson, N.L.: Theoretical considerations regarding H.R.B. Hack’s system of randomization for cross-classifications. Biometrika 45, 265–266 (1958)MATHGoogle Scholar
  126. 692.
    Johnson, N.L., Kotz, S.: Wilks, Samuel Stanley. In: Johnson, N.L., Kotz, S. (eds.) Leading Personalities in Statistical Sciences: From the Seventeenth Century to the Present, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, pp. 211–212. Wiley, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  127. 699.
    Jonckheere, A.R.: A distribution-free k-sample test against ordered alternatives. Biometrika 41, 133–145 (1954)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  128. 707.
    Kamat, A.R.: A two-sample distribution-free test. Biometrika 43, 388–387 (1956)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  129. 712.
    Kean, S.: The Disappearing Spoon. Little, Brown, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  130. 719.
    Kempthorne, O.: The randomization theory of experimental inference. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 50, 946–967 (1955)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  131. 728.
    Kendall, M.G.: A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika 30, 81–93 (1938)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  132. 730.
    Kendall, M.G.: The treatment of ties in ranking problems. Biometrika 33, 239–251 (1945)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  133. 731.
    Kendall, M.G.: The Advanced Theory of Statistics, vol. II. Griffin, London (1946)MATHGoogle Scholar
  134. 733.
    Kendall, M.G.: The variance of τ when both rankings contain ties. Biometrika 34, 297–298 (1947)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  135. 734.
    Kendall, M.G.: Rank Correlation Methods. Griffin, London (1948)MATHGoogle Scholar
  136. 739.
    Kendall, M.G., Babington Smith, B.: The problem of m rankings. Ann. Math. Stat. 10, 275–287 (1939)Google Scholar
  137. 741.
    Kendall, M.G., Babington Smith, B.: On the method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 31, 324–345 (1940)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  138. 746.
    Kendall, M.G., Kendall, S.F.H., Babington Smith, B.: The distribution of Spearman’s coefficient of rank correlation in a universe in which all rankings occur an equal number of times. Biometrika 30, 251–273 (1939)MATHGoogle Scholar
  139. 751.
    Kiang, L.Y.: Charles Stein: The invariant, the direct and the “pretentious”. In: Kiang, L.Y. (ed.) Creative Minds, Charmed Lives: Interviews at Institute for Mathematical Sciences, National University of Singapore, pp. 282–287. World Scientific, Singapore (2010)Google Scholar
  140. 753.
    Kiernan, D.: The Girls of Atomic City: The Untold Story of the Women Who Helped Win World War II. Touchstone, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  141. 767.
    Kotz, S., Johnson, N.L. (eds.): Breakthroughs in Statistics: Foundations and Basic Theory, vol. I. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  142. 768.
    Kraft, C.A., van Eeden, C.: A Nonparametric Introduction to Statistics. Macmillan, New York (1968)Google Scholar
  143. 770.
    Kramp, C.: Éléments d’arithmétique universelle. Hansen, Cologne (1808)Google Scholar
  144. 776.
    Kruskal, W.H.: Historical notes on the Wilcoxon unpaired two-sample test. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 52, 356–360 (1957)MATHGoogle Scholar
  145. 779.
    Kruskal, W.H., Wallis, W.A.: Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 47, 583–621 (1952) [Erratum: J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 48, 907–911 (1953)]Google Scholar
  146. 799.
    Langdon, Jr., G.G.: An algorithm for generating permutations. Commun. ACM 10, 5 (1967)Google Scholar
  147. 804.
    Latscha, R.: Tests of significance in a 2 × 2 contingency table: Extension of Finney’s table. Biometrika 40, 74–86 (1953)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  148. 806.
    Leach, C.: Introduction to Statistics: A Nonparametric Approach for the Social Sciences. Wiley, New York (1979)Google Scholar
  149. 808.
    Ledermann, W.: Walter Ledermann: Encounters of a Mathematician. http://www-history.mcs.st.andrews.ac.uk/Ledermann/Ch7.html (2000). Accessed 6 Feb 2012
  150. 814.
    Lehmann, E.L.: Reminiscences of a Statistician: The Company I Kept. Springer, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  151. 815.
    Lehmann, E.L.: Parametrics vs. nonparametrics: Two alternative methodologies. J. Nonparametr. Stat. 21, 397–405 (2009)Google Scholar
  152. 818.
    Lehmann, E.L., Stein, C.M.: On the theory of some non-parametric hypotheses. Ann. Math. Stat. 20, 28–45 (1949)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  153. 821.
    Leslie, P.H.: A simple method of calculating the exact probability in 2 × 2 contingency tables with small marginal totals. Biometrika 42, 522–523 (1955)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  154. 823.
    Levin, R.C.: A Yale pioneer: The freshman address. Yale Alum. Mag., 1–4. http://www.yalealumnimagazine.com/issues/2009_11/levin5962.html (November/December 2009). Accessed 14 Mar 2012
  155. 830.
    Lindley, D.V.: Professor George A. Barnard, 1915–2002. Statistician 52, 231–234 (2003)Google Scholar
  156. 831.
    Lindley, D.V.: George Barnard: Anti-establishment statistician concerned with quality control. The Guardian. http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2002/aug/09/guardianobituaries.highereducation (9 August 2002). Accessed 2 Oct 2012
  157. 833.
    Litchfield, Jr., J.T., Wilcoxon, F.: The rank correlation method. Anal. Chem. 27, 299–300 (1955)Google Scholar
  158. 837.
    Liu, C.N., Tang, D.T.: Algorithm 452: Enumerating combinations of m out of n objects. Commun. ACM 16, 485 (1973)Google Scholar
  159. 851.
    Ludbrook, J.: The Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test condemned. Br. J. Surg. 83, 136–137 (1996)Google Scholar
  160. 865.
    MacMahon, P.A.: Combinatory Analysis, vol. II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1916)Google Scholar
  161. 866.
    MacNeill, I.: A conversation with David J. Finney. Stat. Sci. 8, 187–201 (1993)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  162. 869.
    Mahanti, S.: John Burdon Sanderson Haldane: The ideal of a polymath. Vigyan Prasar Science Portal. http://www.vigyanprasar.gov.in/scientists/JBSHaldane.htm (2007). Accessed 20 Jan 2012
  163. 870.
    Maisel, M., Smart, L.: Admiral Grace Murray Hopper: Pioneer computer scientist. http://www.sdsc.edu/ScienceWomen/hopper.html (1997). Accessed 13 Mar 2012
  164. 874.
    Management: Du Pont educates engineers. Chem. Eng. News 36, 38–39 (1958)Google Scholar
  165. 879.
    Mann, H.B.: Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13, 245–259 (1945)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  166. 880.
    Mann, H.B., Whitney, D.R.: On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Ann. Math. Stat. 18, 50–60 (1947)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  167. 900.
    Martín Andrés, A., Luna del Castillo, J.D.: Comment on “Sensitivity of Fisher’s exact test to minor perturbations in 2 × 2 contingency tables” by W.D. Dupont. Stat. Med. 8, 243–245 (1989)Google Scholar
  168. 905.
    Matsumoto, M., Nishimura, T.: Mersenne twister: A 623-dimensionally equidistributed uniform pseudo-random number generator. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. S. 8, 3–30 (1998)MATHGoogle Scholar
  169. 908.
    May, R.B., Hunter, M.A.: Some advantages of permutation tests. Can. Psychol. 34, 401–407 (1993)Google Scholar
  170. 913.
    McDonald, L.L., Davis, B.M., Milliken, G.A.: A nonrandomized unconditional test for comparing two proportions in 2 × 2 contingency tables. Technometrics 19, 145–157 (1977)MATHGoogle Scholar
  171. 926.
    Metropolis, N.: The beginning of the Monte Carlo method. Los Alamos Sci. 15, 125–130 (1987)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  172. 927.
    Metropolis, N., Ulam, S.: The Monte Carlo method. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 44, 335–341 (1949)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  173. 932.
    Mielke, P.W.: Asymptotic behavior of two-sample tests based on powers of ranks for detecting scale and location alternatives. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 67, 850–854 (1972)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  174. 933.
    Mielke, P.W.: Squared rank test appropriate to weather modification cross-over design. Technometrics 16, 13–16 (1974)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  175. 965.
    Mielke, P.W., Berry, K.J.: Permutation Methods: A Distance Function Approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  176. 971.
    Mielke, P.W., Berry, K.J., Johnson, E.S.: Multi-response permutation procedures for a priori classifications. Commun. Stat. Theor. Methods 5, 1409–1424 (1976)Google Scholar
  177. 987.
    Mielke, P.W., Sen, P.K.: On asymptotic non-normal null distributions for locally most powerful rank test statistics. Commun. Stat. Theor. Methods 10, 1079–1094 (1981)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  178. 988.
    Mielke, P.W., Siddiqui, M.M.: A combinatorial test for independence of dichotomous responses. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 60, 437–441 (1965)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  179. 996.
    Milton, R.C.: An extended table of critical values for the Mann–Whitney (Wilcoxon) two-sample statistic. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 59, 925–934 (1964)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  180. 998.
    Montgomery, D.C.: A conversation with Stu Hunter. Qual. Eng. 21, 233–240 (2009)Google Scholar
  181. 999.
    Mood, A.M.: The distribution theory of runs. Ann. Math. Stat. 11, 367–392 (1940)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  182. 1000.
    Mood, A.M.: Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York (1950)MATHGoogle Scholar
  183. 1001.
    Mood, A.M.: On the asymptotic efficiency of certain nonparametric two-sample tests. Ann. Math. Stat. 25, 514–522 (1954)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  184. 1003.
    Moran, P.A.P.: On the method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 34, 363–365 (1947)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  185. 1004.
    Moran, P.A.P.: Rank correlation and permutation distributions. Math. Proc. Camb. 44, 142–144 (1948)MATHGoogle Scholar
  186. 1005.
    Moran, P.A.P.: Recent developments in ranking theory. J. R. Stat. Soc. B Met. 12, 152–162 (1950)Google Scholar
  187. 1008.
    Morton, N.: Cedric Smith (1917–2002). Int. Stat. Inst. News 26, 9–10 (2002)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  188. 1009.
    Moscovici, S.: Obituary: Leon Festinger. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 19, 263–269 (1989)Google Scholar
  189. 1010.
    Moses, L.E.: Non-parametric statistics for psychological research. Psychol. Bull. 49, 122–143 (1952)Google Scholar
  190. 1011.
    Moses, L.E.: Statistical theory and research design. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 7, 233–258 (1956)Google Scholar
  191. 1012.
    Mosteller, F.: Samuel S. Wilks: Statesman of statistics. Am. Stat. 18, 11–17 (1964)Google Scholar
  192. 1014.
    Munro, T.A.: Phenylketonuria: Data on forty-seven British families. Ann. Hum. Genet. 14, 60–88 (1947)Google Scholar
  193. 1017.
    Murray, G.D.: Reply from BJS statistical advisor to “The Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test condemned” by J. Ludbrook. Br. J. Surg. 83, 137 (1996)Google Scholar
  194. 1018.
    Murray, M.A.M.: The first lady of math? Yale Alum. Mag., 5–6. http://www.yalealumnimagazine.com/issues/2010_05/letters_412.html (May/June 2010). Accessed 14 Mar 2012
  195. 1019.
    Nadkarni, A.S.: Anant Raoji Kamat. Econ. Polit. Weekly 18, 1351–1352 (30 July 1983)Google Scholar
  196. 1038.
    Noether, G.E.: Asymptotic properties of the Wald–Wolfowitz test of randomness. Ann. Math. Stat. 21, 231–246 (1950)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  197. 1039.
    Noether, G.E.: On a theorem of Pitman. Ann. Math. Stat. 26, 64–68 (1955)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  198. 1042.
    Norman, R.: Biographies of women mathematicians: Grace Murray Hopper. http://www.agnesscott.edu/lriddle/women/hopper.htm (2001). Accessed 13 Mar 2012
  199. 1054.
    Olds, E.G.: Distribution of sums of squares of rank differences for small numbers of individuals. Ann. Math. Stat. 9, 133–148 (1938)Google Scholar
  200. 1056.
    Olkin, I.: A conversation with W. Allen Wallis. Stat. Sci. 6, 121–140 (1991)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  201. 1057.
    Olkin, I.: A conversation with Churchill Eisenhart. Stat. Sci. 7, 512–530 (1992)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  202. 1059.
    Olmstead, P.S., Tukey, J.W.: A corner test for association. Ann. Math. Stat. 18, 495–513 (1947)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  203. 1060.
    Olson, J.: Henry Berthold Mann. Department of Mathematics, The Ohio State University. http://www.math.osu.edu/history/biographies/mann/. Accessed 20 Jan 2012
  204. 1065.
    Ord-Smith, R.J.: Algorithm 308: Generation of permutations in pseudo-lexicographic order. Commun. ACM 10, 7 (1967)Google Scholar
  205. 1067.
    Ord-Smith, R.J.: Algorithm 323: Generation of permutations in lexicographic order. Commun. ACM 11, 2 (1968)Google Scholar
  206. 1085.
    Page, E.S.: A note on generating random permutations. J. R. Stat. Soc. C Appl. 16, 273–274 (1967)Google Scholar
  207. 1088.
    Pascal, B.: Traité du triangle arithmétique (Treatise on the arithmetical triangle). In: Smith, D.E. (ed.) A Source Book in Mathematics, vol. I, pp. 67–79. Dover, New York (1959) [Translated by A. Savitsky]Google Scholar
  208. 1091.
    Payne, W.H., Ives, F.M.: Combination generators. ACM Trans. Math. Software 5, 163–172 (1979)Google Scholar
  209. 1095.
    Pearson, E.S.: The choice of statistical tests illustrated on the interpretation of data classed in a 2 × 2 table. Biometrika 34, 139–167 (1947)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  210. 1124.
    Phillips, J.P.N.: Algorithm 28: Permutations of the elements of a vector in lexicographic order. Comput. J. 10, 311 (1967)Google Scholar
  211. 1129.
    Pitman, E.J.G.: Significance tests which may be applied to samples from any populations. Suppl. J. R. Stat. Soc. 4, 119–130 (1937)Google Scholar
  212. 1130.
    Pitman, E.J.G.: Significance tests which may be applied to samples from any populations: II. The correlation coefficient test. Suppl. J. R. Stat. Soc. 4, 225–232 (1937)Google Scholar
  213. 1131.
    Pitman, E.J.G.: Significance tests which may be applied to samples from any populations: III. The analysis of variance test. Biometrika 29, 322–335 (1938)MATHGoogle Scholar
  214. 1132.
    Pitman, E.J.G.: Lecture notes on non-parametric statistical inference (1948) [Unpublished lecture notes for a course given at Columbia University in 1948]Google Scholar
  215. 1140.
    Plackett, R.L.: Obituary: Churchill Eisenhart. J. R. Stat. Soc. A Stat. 158, 338 (1995)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  216. 1153.
    Randles, R.H., Wolfe, D.A.: Introduction to the Theory of Nonparametric Statistics. Wiley, New York (1979)MATHGoogle Scholar
  217. 1167.
    Rice, W.R.: A new probability model for determining exact p-values for 2 × 2 contingency tables when comparing binomial proportions. Biometrics 44, 1–22 (1988)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  218. 1168.
    Rice, W.R.: Reply to the discussion of “A new probability model for determining exact P-values for 2 × 2 contingency tables when comparing binomial proportions” by W.R. Rice. Biometrics 44, 18–22 (1988)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  219. 1178.
    Robinson, J.: The large-sample power of permutation tests for randomization models. Ann. Stat. 1, 291–296 (1973)MATHGoogle Scholar
  220. 1182.
    Rodrigues, O.: Note sur les inversions, ou dérangements produits dans les permutations (Note on inversions, or products of derangements in permutations). J. Math. Pure. Appl. 4, 236–240 (1839) [The Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées is also known as the Journal de Liouville]Google Scholar
  221. 1183.
    Rohl, J.S.: Programming improvements to Fike’s algorithm for generating permutations. Comput. J. 19, 156–159 (1976)Google Scholar
  222. 1184.
    Rohl, J.S.: Generating permutations by choosing. Comput. J. 21, 302–305 (1978)MATHGoogle Scholar
  223. 1187.
    Rojo, J.: Erich Leo Lehmann — A glimpse into his life and work. Ann. Stat. 39, 2244–2265 (2011)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  224. 1193.
    Rosenbaum, S.: Tables for a nonparametric test of dispersion. Ann. Math. Stat. 24, 663–668 (1953)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  225. 1214.
    Saito, M., Matsumoto, M.: SIMD-oriented fast Mersenne twister: A 128-bit pseudorandom number generator. In: Keller, A., Heinrich, S., Niederreiter, H. (eds.) Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods 2006, pp. 607–622. Springer, Berlin (2008) [Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods in Scientific Computing, held at Ulm University, Germany, in August 2006]Google Scholar
  226. 1218.
    Salsburg, D.: The Lady Tasting Tea: How Statistics Revolutionized Science in the Twentieth Century. Holt, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  227. 1221.
    Sandiford, P.: Educational Psychology. Longmans, Green & Company, New York (1928) [The graphical method appears in an Appendix by S.D. Holmes, ‘A graphical method of estimating R for small groups’, pp. 391–394]Google Scholar
  228. 1224.
    Savage, I.R.: Nonparametric statistics. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 52, 331–344 (1957)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  229. 1227.
    Sawrey, W.L.: A distinction between exact and approximate nonparametric methods. Psychometrika 23, 171–177 (1958)MATHGoogle Scholar
  230. 1229.
    Schachter, S.: Leon Festinger, May 8, 1919 – February 11, 1989. Natl. Acad. Sci. Bio. Mem., 99–110. http://www.motherjones.com/files/lfestinger.pdf (1994). Accessed 19 June 2012
  231. 1230.
    Scheffé, H.: Statistical inference in the non-parametric case. Ann. Math. Stat. 14, 305–332 (1943)MATHGoogle Scholar
  232. 1231.
    Scheffé, H.: Alternative models for the analysis of variance. Ann. Math. Stat. 27, 251–271 (1956)MATHGoogle Scholar
  233. 1273.
    Siegel, S., Tukey, J.W.: A nonparametric sum of ranks procedure for relative spread in unpaired samples. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 55, 429–445 (1960) [Corrigendum: J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 56, 1005 (1961)]Google Scholar
  234. 1275.
    Silvey, S.D.: The equivalence of asymptotic distributions under randomisation and normal theories. Proc. Glasgow Math. Assoc. 1, 139–147 (1953)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  235. 1276.
    Silvey, S.D.: The asymptotic distributions of statistics arising in certain nonparametric tests. Proc. Glasgow Math. Assoc. 2, 47–51 (1954)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  236. 1296.
    Soms, A.P.: An algorithm for the discrete Fisher’s permutation test. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 72, 662–664 (1977)MATHGoogle Scholar
  237. 1300.
    Spearman, C.E.: The proof and measurement of association between two things. Am. J. Psychol. 15, 72–101 (1904)Google Scholar
  238. 1301.
    Spearman, C.E.: ‘Footrule’ for measuring correlation. Br. J. Psychol. 2, 89–108 (1906)Google Scholar
  239. 1335.
    Sun, Y.Q., Sherman, M.: Some permutation tests for survival data. Biometrics 52, 87–97 (1996)MATHGoogle Scholar
  240. 1337.
    Swed, F.S., Eisenhart, C.: Tables for testing randomness of grouping in a sequence of alternatives. Ann. Math. Stat. 14, 66–87 (1943)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  241. 1344.
    Teichroew, D.: A history of distribution sampling prior to the era of the computer and its relevance to simulation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 60, 27–49 (1965)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  242. 1347.
    Terpstra, T.J.: The asymptotic normality and consistency of Kendall’s test against trend, when ties are present in one ranking. Indagat. Math. 14, 327–333 (1952)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  243. 1360.
    Thompson, W.R.: Biological applications of normal range and associated significance tests in ignorance of original distribution forms. Ann. Math. Stat. 9, 122–128 (1938)Google Scholar
  244. 1363.
    Todhunter, I.: A History of the Mathematical Theory of Probability: From the Time of Pascal to That of Laplace. Chelsea, Bronx (1965/1865) [A 1965 textually-unaltered reprint of the 1865 original]Google Scholar
  245. 1383.
    Tukey, J.W., Olmstead, P.S.: The corner test for association. Ann. Math. Stat. 18, 299 (1947)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  246. 1391.
    van der Reyden, D.: A simple statistical significance test. Rhod. Agric. J. 49, 96–104 (1952)Google Scholar
  247. 1398.
    Verdooren, L.R.: Extended tables of critical values for Wilcoxon’s test statistic. Biometrika 50, 177–186 (1963)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  248. 1405.
    Wald, A., Wolfowitz, J.: On a test whether two samples are from the same population. Ann. Math. Stat. 11, 147–162 (1940)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  249. 1406.
    Wald, A., Wolfowitz, J.: An exact test for randomness in the non-parametric case based on serial correlation. Ann. Math. Stat. 14, 378–388 (1943)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  250. 1407.
    Wald, A., Wolfowitz, J.: Statistical tests based on permutations of the observations. Ann. Math. Stat. 15, 358–372 (1944)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  251. 1410.
    W. Allen Wallis, obituary. Institute of Political Economy. http://www.lib.rochester.edu/index.cfm?page=4727. Accessed 20 Jan 2012
  252. 1411.
    Wallis, W.A.: The correlation ratio for ranked data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 34, 533–538 (1939)MATHGoogle Scholar
  253. 1418.
    Wasserstein, R.: George Box: A model statistician. Significance 7, 134–135 (2010)Google Scholar
  254. 1419.
    Watnik, M.: Early computational statistics. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 20, 811–817 (2011)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  255. 1424.
    Weik, M.H.: The ENIAC story. Ordnance 45, 571–575 (1961)Google Scholar
  256. 1426.
    Weiss, L.: Wald, Abraham. In: Johnson, N.L., Kotz, S. (eds.) Leading Personalities in Statistical Sciences: From the Seventeenth Century to the Present, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, pp. 164–167. Wiley, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  257. 1428.
    Welch, B.L.: On the z-test in randomized blocks and Latin squares. Biometrika 29, 21–52 (1937)MATHGoogle Scholar
  258. 1429.
    Welch, B.L.: On tests for homogeneity. Biometrika 30, 149–158 (1938)MATHGoogle Scholar
  259. 1430.
    Welch, B.L.: The significance of the difference between two means when the population variances are unequal. Biometrika 29, 350–362 (1938)MATHGoogle Scholar
  260. 1431.
    Welch, W.J.: Rerandomizing the median in matched-pairs designs. Biometrika 74, 609–614 (1987)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  261. 1436.
    Wells, M.B.: Computing at LASL in the 1940s and 1950s: MANIAC. Tech. rep., Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Los Alamos (May 1978)Google Scholar
  262. 1441.
    White, C.: The use of ranks in a test of significance for comparing two treatments. Biometrics 8, 33–41 (1952)MATHGoogle Scholar
  263. 1443.
    Whitfield, J.W.: Rank correlation between two variables, one of which is ranked, the other dichotomous. Biometrika 34, 292–296 (1947)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  264. 1444.
    Whitfield, J.W.: Uses of the ranking method in psychology. J. R. Stat. Soc. B Met. 12, 163–170 (1950)Google Scholar
  265. 1446.
    Whitworth, W.A.: Choice and Chance. G. E. Stechert, New York (1942)Google Scholar
  266. 1453.
    Wilcoxon, F.: Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bull. 1, 80–83 (1945)Google Scholar
  267. 1454.
    Wilcoxon, F.: Probability tables for individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics 3, 119–122 (1947)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  268. 1455.
    Wilkes, M.V.: Memoirs of a Computer Pioneer. MIT Press, Cambridge (1985)Google Scholar
  269. 1456.
    Wilks, S.S.: Order statistics. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 54, 6–50 (1948)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  270. 1460.
    Willke, T.: In Memoriam – Ransom Whitney. The Ohio State University, Department of Statistics News 16, 8. http://www.stat.osu.edu/sites/default/files/news/statnews2008.pdf (2008). Accessed 17 Jan 2012
  271. 1464.
    Wolfowitz, J.: Additive partition functions and a class of statistical hypotheses. Ann. Math. Stat. 13, 247–279 (1942)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  272. 1465.
    Wolfowitz, J.: On the theory of runs with some applications to quality control. Ann. Math. Stat. 14, 280–288 (1943)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  273. 1466.
    Wolfowitz, J.: Non-parametric statistical inference. In: Neyman, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the [First] Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pp. 93–113. University of California Press, Berkeley (1949)Google Scholar
  274. 1472.
    Yates, F.: Contingency tables involving small numbers and the χ 2 test. Suppl. J. R. Stat. Soc. 1, 217–235 (1934)MATHGoogle Scholar
  275. 1484.
    Zabell, S.: A conversation with William Kruskal. Stat. Sci. 9, 285–303 (1994)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  276. 1485.
    Zabell, S.: Meyer Dwass 1923–1996. B. Inst. Math. Stat. 27, 1–67 (1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth J. Berry
    • 1
  • Janis E. Johnston
    • 2
  • Paul W. MielkeJr.
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SociologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  2. 2.U.S. GovernmentAlexandriaUSA
  3. 3.Department of StatisticsColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations