Determinants of Cross-Regional R&D Collaboration Networks: An Application of Exponential Random Graph Models

  • Tom BroekelEmail author
  • Matté Hartog
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)


This study investigates the usefulness of exponential random graph models (ERGM) to analyze the determinants of cross-regional R&D collaboration networks. Using spatial interaction models, most research on R&D collaboration between regions is constrained to focus on determinants at the node level (e.g. R&D activity of a region) and dyad level (e.g. geographical distance between regions). ERGMs represent a new set of network analysis techniques that has been developed in recent years in mathematical sociology. In contrast to spatial interaction models, ERGMs additionally allow considering determinants at the structural network level while still only requiring cross-sectional network data.

The usefulness of ERGMs is illustrated by an empirical study on the structure of the cross-regional R&D collaboration network of the German chemical industry. The empirical results confirm the importance of determinants at all three levels. It is shown that in addition to determinants at the node and dyad level, the structural network level determinant “triadic closure” helps in explaining the structure of the network. That is, regions that are indirectly linked to each other are more likely to be directly linked as well.


Preferential Attachment Collaboration Network Node Level Labor Market Region Spatial Interaction Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Autant-Bernard C, Billand P, Frachisse D, Massard N (2007) Social distance versus spatial distance in R&D co-operation: empirical evidence from European collaboration choices in micro and nanotechnologies. Pap Reg Sci 86:495–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barabasi AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 15:509–512Google Scholar
  3. Boschma R (2005) Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Reg Stud 39(1):61–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boschma RA, Ter Wal ALJ (2007) Knowledge networks and innovative performance in an industrial district: the case of a footwear district in the south of Italy. Ind Innov 14:177–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Breschi S, Lissoni F (2009) Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: an anatomy of localized knowledge flows. J Econ Geogr 9:439–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broekel T (2007) A concordance between industries and technologies – matching the technological fields of the Patentatlas to the German industry classification. Jenaer economic research papers, 2007-013Google Scholar
  7. Broekel T, Boschma R (2012) Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: the proximity paradox. J Econ Geogr 12:409–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Broekel T, Graf H (2012) Public research intensity and the structure of German R&D networks: a comparison of 10 technologies. Econ Innov New Technol 21(4):345–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Broekel T, Hartog M (2013) Explaining the structure of inter-organizational networks using exponential random graph models: does proximity matter? Industry Innov 20(3):277–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35:128–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol 94(Suppl):S95–S120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Desmarais BA, Cranmer SJ (2012) Micro-level interpretation of exponential random graph models with an application to estuary networks. Policy Stud J 40. doi:  10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00459.x
  13. Fischer MM, Scherngell T, Jansenberger E (2006) The geography of knowledge spillovers between high-technology firms in Europe. Evidence from a spatial interaction modeling perspective. Geogr Anal 38:288–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fritsch M, Slavtchev V (2007) Universities and innovation in space. Ind Innov 14:201–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giuliani E, Bell M (2005) The micro-determinants of meso-learning and innovation: evidence from a Chilean wine cluster. Res Policy 34:47–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glückler J (2010) The evolution of a strategic alliance network: exploring the case of stock photography. In: Boschma R, Martin R (eds) Handbook of evolutionary economic geography. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 298–315Google Scholar
  17. Greif S, Schmiedl D (2002) Patentatlas 2002 Dynamik und Strukturen der Erfindungstätigkeit. Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  18. Greif S, Schmiedl D, Niedermeyer G (2006) Patentatlas 2006. Regionaldaten der Erfindungstätigkeit. Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  19. Gulati R (1999) Network location and learning: the influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strateg Manag J 20:397–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Handcock MS (2003) Statistical models for social networks: degeneracy and inference. In: Breiger RL, Carley KM, Pattison P (eds) Dynamic social network modeling and analysis: workshop summary and papers. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, pp 229–240Google Scholar
  21. Hoekman J, Frenken K, Van Oort F (2009) The geography of collaborative knowledge production in Europe. Ann Reg Sci 43:721–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoekman J, Frenken K, Tijssen RJW (2010) Research collaboration at a distance: changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Res Policy 39:662–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hunter DR (2007) Curved exponential family models for social networks. Soc Netw 29(2):216–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hunter DR, Goodreau SM, Handcock MS (2008) Goodness of fit for social network models. J Am Stat Assoc 103:248–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jaffe A (1989) Real effects of academic research. Am Econ Rev 79(5):957–970Google Scholar
  26. LeSage J, Fischer MM, Scherngell T (2007) Knowledge spillovers across Europe. Evidence from a Poisson spatial interaction model with spatial effects. Pap Reg Sci 86:393–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maggioni MA, Nosvelli M, Uberti TE (2007) Space versus networks in the geography of innovation: a European analysis. Pap Reg Sci 86:471–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maskell P, Malmberg A (1999) Localized learning and industrial competitiveness. Camb J Econ 23:167–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Ann Rev Sociol 27:415–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Metcalfe S (1995) The economic foundations of technology policy: equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives. In: Stoneman P (ed) Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 409–512Google Scholar
  31. Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  32. Nooteboom B (2000) Learning and innovation in organizations and economies. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  33. Ponds R, Van Oort F, And Frenken K (2007) The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Pap Reg Sci 86:423–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Powell WW, White DR, Koput KW, Owen-Smith J (2005) Network dynamics and field evolution: the growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. Am J Sociol 110:1132–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Robins R, Snijders T, Wang P, Handcock M, Pattison P (2006) Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Soc Netw 29:192–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Robins G, Pattison P, Kalish Y, Lusher D (2007) An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Soc Netw 29:173–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98:71–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saul ZM, Filkov V (2007) Exploring biological network structure using exponential random graph models. Bioinformatics 23:2604–2611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scherngell T, Barber MJ (2009) Spatial interaction modeling of cross-region R&D collaboration: empirical evidence from the 5th EU framework programme. Pap Reg Sci 88:531–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Scherngell T, Barber MJ (2011) Distinct spatial characteristics of industrial and public research collaborations: evidence from the fifth EU framework programme. Ann Reg Sci 46:247–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Snijders TAB (2002) Markov Chain Monte Carlo estimation of exponential random graph models. J Soc Struct 3. Web journal available from:
  42. Snijders TAB, Pattison PE, Robins G, Handcock MS (2006) New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociol Methodol 36:99–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Snijders TAB, van de Bunt GG, Steglich CEG (2010) Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Soc Netw 32:44–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sobrero M, Roberts EB (2001) The trade-off between efficiency and learning in interorganizational relationships for product development. Manag Sci 47:493–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ter Wal ALJ (2011) The dynamics of inventor networks in German biotechnology: geographical proximity versus triadic closure. Pap Evol Econ Geogr 11:02Google Scholar
  46. Ter Wal ALJ, Boschma RA (2009) Applying social network analysis in economic geography: framing some key analytic issues. Ann Reg Sci 43:739–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Uddin S, Hamra J, Hossain L (2012) Exploring communication networks to understand organizational crisis using exponential random graph models. Comput Math Organ Theor. doi: 10.1007/s10588-011-9104-8 Google Scholar
  48. Van Duin MAJ, Gille KJ, Handcock MS (2009) A framework for the comparison of maximum pseudo-likelihood and maximum likelihood estimation of exponential family random graph models. Soc Netw 31:52–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Varas MLL (2007) Essays in social space: applications to Chilean communities on inter-sector social linkages, social capital, and social justice. Dissertation at University of Illinois, Urbana-ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang P, Pattison P, Robins G (2012) Exponential random graph model specifications for bipartite networks – a dependence hierarchy. Soc Netw.
  51. Wright D (2010) Repression and network science: tools in fight against terrorism. Dissertation at University of Michigan:

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Economic and Cultural GeographyLeibniz University of HanoverHanoverGermany
  2. 2.Section of Economic Geography, Faculty of GeosciencesUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations