QoE-Based Network and Application Management

  • Raimund SchatzEmail author
  • Markus Fiedler
  • Lea Skorin-Kapov
Part of the T-Labs Series in Telecommunication Services book series (TLABS)


This chapter presents an overview of a set of recently proposed QoE-based management approaches that all try so resolve a central dilemma: maximizing user satisfaction while at the same time maximizing resource efficiency and economy. To this end, it first builds bridges between recent approaches towards QoE-based Network Management and standardized Network Management functions. This is contrasted by a discussion of recent approaches towards QoE-based Application Management. Further, it is shown how both Network Management and Application Management can work together in concert. Finally, open issues regarding a better integration of management and QoE are outlined.


Network Management Scalable Video Code Fault Management Next Generation Network Client Device 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    EU FP7 Project ETICS (2010–2013) Economics and technologies for inter-carrier services.
  2. 2.
    (2011) NGN integrated subsystem architecture. ETSI TS 182 028, v3.5.1Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    EU Celtic-Plus Project QuEEN (2011–2015) Quality of experience estimators in networks.
  4. 4.
    (2013) Policy and charging control architecture. 3GPP TS 23.203, release 12.
  5. 5.
    Abboud O, Zinner T, Pussep K, Al-Sabea S, Steinmetz R (2011) On the impact of quality adaptation in SVC-based P2P video-on-demand systems. In: Proceedings of the second annual ACM conference on multimedia systems, MMSys ’11, ACM, New York, USA, pp 223–232. doi: 10.1145/1943552.1943582
  6. 6.
    Adhikari VK, Jain S, Chen Y, Zhang ZL (2012) Vivisecting YouTube: an active measurement study. In: Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2012 mini-conference, Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alberti C et al. (2013) Automated QoE evaluation of dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP. In: Fifth international workshop on quality of multimedia experience, QoMEXGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alcock S, Nelson R (2011) Application flow control in YouTube video streams. ACM SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev 41(2):24–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ameigeiras P, Ramos-Munoz JJ, Navarro-Ortiz J, Mogensen P, Lopez-Soler JM (2010) QoE oriented cross-layer design of a resource allocation algorithm in beyond 3g systems. Comput Commun 33(5):571–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aristomenopoulos G, Kastrinogiannis T, Kaldanis V, Karantonis G, Papavassiliou S (2010) A novel framework for dynamic utility-based QoE provisioning in wireless networks. In: IEEE global telecommunications conference (GLOBECOM 2010). IEEE pp 1–6Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baraković S, Skorin-Kapov L (2013) Survey and challenges of QoE management issues in wireless networks. J Comput Netw Commun 2013:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boutaba R, Polyrakis A (2001) Projecting FCAPS to active networks. In: Proceedings of the enterprise networking, applications and service conference, pp 97–104Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dillon E, Power G, Ramos MO, Rodriguez MC, Argente JR, Fiedler M, Tonesi D (2009) PERIMETER: a quality of experience framework. In: Proceedings of the future internet symposium (FIS), Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    El Essaili A, Zhou L, Schroeder D, Steinbach E, Kellerer W (2011) QoE-driven live and on-demand LTE uplink video transmission. In: 2011 IEEE 13th international workshop on multimedia signal processing (MMSP). IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fiedler M, Hoßfeld T (2010) Quality of experience-related differential equations and provisioning-delivery hysteresis. In: 21st ITC specialist seminar on multimedia applications-Traffic, performance and QoE, Miyazaki, JapanGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Finamore A, Mellia M, Munafo M, Torres R, Rao S (2011) YouTube everywhere: impact of device and infrastructure synergies on user experience. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM internet measurement conference (IMC’11), Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gehlen V, Finamore A, Mellia M, Munafò MM (2012) Uncovering the big players of the web. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on traffic monitoring and analysis, TMA’12, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 15–28Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ghobadi M, Cheng Y, Jain A, Matthis M (2012) Trickle: rate limiting Youtube video streaming. In: Proceedings of the 2012 USENIX annual technical conference, Boston, USAGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gomez G, Lorca J, Garcia R, Perez Q (2013) Towards a QoE-driven resource control in LTE and LTE-A networks. J Comput Netw Commun 2013:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gorod A, Gove R, Sauser B, Boardman J (2007) System of systems management: a network management approach. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on system of systems engineering (SoSE’07), pp 1–5Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goyal P, Mikkilineni R (2009) FCAPS in the business services fabric model. In: Proceedings of the 18th international workshop on enabling technologies (WETICE’09), pp 45–51Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Han Z, Liu KR (2008) Resource allocation for wireless networks: basics, techniques, and applications. Cambridge university press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hong DK, Hong C, Hyoung Y (2002) An integrated network management framework for internet access service using ATM over ADSL technology. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE international conference on high speed networks and multimedia, communications, pp 24–31Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hoßfeld T, Egger S, Schatz R, Fiedler M, Masuch K, Lorentzen C (2012) Initial delay vs. interruptions: between the devil and the deep blue sea. In: 2012 fourth international workshop on quality of multimedia experience (QoMEX), p 16Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hoßfeld T, Fiedler M, Zinner T (2011) The QoE provisioning-delivery-hysteresis and its importance for service provisioning in the future internet. In: Proceedings of the 7th EURO-NGI conference on next generation internet networks (NGI 2011), Kaiserslautern, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hoßfeld T, Liers F, Schatz R, Staehle B, Staehle D, Volkert T, Wamser F (2012) Quality of experience management for YouTube: clouds, FoG and the AquareYoum. PIK–praxis der informationsverarbeitung und kommunikation 35(3). doi: 10.1515/pik-2012-0024.
  27. 27.
    Hoßfeld T, Schatz R, Seufert M, Hirth M, Zinner T, Tran-Gia P (2011) Quantification of YouTube QoE via crowdsourcing. In: IEEE international workshop on multimedia quality of experience—modeling, evaluation, and directions (MQoE 2011), Dana Point, USAGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hoßfeld T, Schatz R, Varela M, Timmerer C (2012) Challenges of QoE management for cloud applications. IEEE Commun Mag 50(4):28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ickin S, Vogeleer KD, Fiedler M, Erman D (2010) On the choice of performance metrics for user-centric seamless communication. In: Proceedings of the third Euro-NF workshop on socio-economic issues of networks of the future, Ghent, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Isaksson L, Fiedler M (2007) Seamless connectivity in WLAN and cellular networks with multi criteria decision making. In: Proceedings of the NGI 2007, Trondheim, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    ISO/IEC (1998) Information technology—open systems interconnection—systems management overviewGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    ITU-T Recommendation Y.1901 (2009) Requirements for the support of IPTV services. International Telecommunication Union, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    ITU-T Recommendation Y.1910 (2008) IPTV—functional architecture. International Telecommunication Union, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ivesic K, Matijasevic M, Skorin-Kapov L (2011) Simulation based evaluation of dynamic resource allocation for adaptive multimedia services. In: 7th international conference on network and service management (CNSM), pp 1–4Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jammeh E, Mkwawa I, Khan A, Goudarzi M, Sun L, Ifeachor E (2012) Quality of experience (QoE) driven adaptation scheme for voice/video over IP. Telecommun Syst 49(1):99–111. doi: 10.1007/s11235-010-9356-5.
  36. 36.
    Jiang J, Sekar V, Zhang H (2012) Improving fairness, efficiency, and stability in HTTP-based adaptive video streaming with FESTIVE. In: Proceedings of the 8th international Conference on emerging networking experiments and technologies, CoNEXT ’12. ACM, New York, USA p 97108. doi: 10.1145/2413176.2413189.
  37. 37.
    Tutschku K, Fiedler M (eds) (2011) Euro-NF deliverable D.SEA.10.2. Second update of the Euro-NF vision regarding the network of the futureGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Khan A, Sun L, Ifeachor E (2012) QoE prediction model and its application in video quality adaptation over UMTS networks. IEEE Trans Multimedia 14(2):431–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Khan A, Sun L, Jammeh E, Ifeachor E (2010) Quality of experience-driven adaptation scheme for video applications over wireless networks. IET Commun 4(11):1337–1347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Khan S, Duhovnikov S, Steinbach E, Kellerer W (2007) MOS-based multiuser multiapplication cross-layer optimization for mobile multimedia communication. Advances in multimediaGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Latré S et al (2009) An autonomic architecture for optimizing QoE in multimedia access networks. Comput Netw 53(10):1587–1602CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lee CS (2007) IPTV over next generation networks in ITU-T. In: IEEE 2nd IEEE/IFIP international workshop on broadband convergence networks, 2007. BcN’07. IEEE, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Liers F, Volkert T, Martin D, Backhaus H, Wippel H, Veith E, Siddiqui AA, Khondoker R (2011) GAPI: a G-Lab application-to-network interface. In: EuroView2011, Würzburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Liers F, Volkert T, Mitschele-Thiel A (2010) Demonstrating forwarding on gates with first applications. In: EuroView2010, Würzburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Liers F, Volkert T, Mitschele-Thiel A (2011) Scalable network support for application requirements with forwarding on gates. In: EuroView2011, Würzburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Liu X, Dobrian F, Milner H, Jiang J, Sekar V, Stoica I, Zhang H (2012) A case for a coordinated internet video control plane. SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev 42(4):359370. doi: 10.1145/2377677.2377752.
  47. 47.
    Lloret J, Garcia M, Atenas M, Canovas A (2011) A QoE management system to improve the IPTV network. Int J Commun Syst 24(1):118–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lu X, Zhou W, Song J (2010) Key issues of future network management. In: Proceedings of the international conference on computer application and system modeling (ICCASM 2010), pp V11–649-V11-653Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Martini MG, Chen CW, Chen Z, Dagiuklas T, Sun L, Zhu X (2012) Guest editorial: QoE-aware wireless multimedia systems. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 30(7):1153–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mok RKP, Chan EWW, Chang RKC (2011) Measuring the quality of experience of http video streaming. In: IEEE/IFIP IM (Pre-conf Session), Dubland, IrelandGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Muller C, Renzi D, Lederer S, Battista S, Timmerer C (2012) Using scalable video coding for dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP in mobile environments. In: 2012 IEEE proceedings of the 20th European signal processing conference (EUSIPCO). IEEE, pp 2208–2212Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Oyman O, Singh S (2012) Quality of experience for HTTP adaptive streaming services. IEEE Commun Mag 50(4):20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Reichl P (2010) From charging for quality of service to charging for quality of experience. Ann Telecommun-Ann Des Télécommun 65(3–4):189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Riiser H, Bergsaker HS, Vigmostad P, Halvorsen P, Griwodz C (2012) A comparison of quality scheduling in commercial adaptive HTTP streaming solutions on a 3G network. In: Proceedings of the 4th workshop on mobile video, MoVid ’12. ACM, New York, USA, p 2530. doi: 10.1145/2151677.2151684.
  55. 55.
    Seppänen J, Varela M (2013) QoE-driven network management for real-time over-the-top multimedia services. In: IEEE wireless communications and networking conference 2013, Shanghai, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Sieber C, Hoßfeld T, Zinner T, Tran-Gia P, Timmerer C (2013) Implementation and user-centric comparison of a novel adaptation logic for DASH with SVC. In: IFIP/IEEE international workshop on quality of experience centric management (QCMan), Ghent, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Skorin-Kapov L, Ivesic K, Aristomenopoulos G, Papavassiliou S (2013) Approaches for utility-based QoE-driven optimization of network resource allocation for multimedia services. In: Biersack E, Callegari C, Matijasevic M (eds) Data traffic monitoring and analysis, vol 7754. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 337–358Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Skorin-Kapov L, Matijasevic M (2009) Modeling of a QoS matching and optimization function for multimedia services in the NGN. Proceedings of the 12th IFIP/IEEE international conference on management of multimedia and mobile networks and services. MMNS, Venice, Italy, pp 55–68Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Staehle B, Hirth M, Pries R, Wamser F, Staehle D (2011) Aquarema in action: improving the YouTube QoE in wireless mesh networks. In: 2011 Baltic congress on future internet communications (BCFIC Riga). IEEE, pp 33–40Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Staehle B, Wamser F, Deschner S, Blenk A, Staehle D, Hahm O, Schmittberger N, Günes M (2011) Application-aware self-optimization of wireless mesh networks with AquareYoum and DES-SERT. In: Euroview 2011, Würzburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Staehle B, Wamser F, Hirth M, Stezenbach D, Staehle D (2011) AquareYoum: application and quality of experience-aware resource management for YouTube in wireless mesh networks. PIK—praxis der informationsverarbeitung und kommunikationGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Stankiewicz R, Jajszczyk A (2011) A survey of QoE assurance in converged networks. Comput Netw 55:1459–1473. Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Sterle J, Volk M, Sedlar U, Bester J, Kos A (2011) Application-based NGN QoE controller. IEEE Commun Mag 49(1):92–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Stockhammer T (2011) Dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP— standards and design principles. In: Proceedings of the second annual ACM conference on multimedia systems, MMSys ’11ACM, New York, USA, pp 133–144Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Thakolsri S, Kellerer W, Steinbach E (2011) QoE-based cross-layer optimization of wireless video with unperceivable temporal video quality fluctuation. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), pp 1–6. doi: 10.1109/icc.2011.5963296
  66. 66.
    Torres R, Finamore A, Kim JR, Mellia M, Munafo MM, Rao S (2011) Dissecting video server selection strategies in the youtube cdn. In: Proceedings of the 31st international conference on distributed computing systems (ICDCS’11), Minneapolis, Minnesota, USAGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Volk M, Guna J, Kos A, Bester J (2008) IPTV systems, standards and architectures: part II–quality-assured provisioning of IPTV services within the NGN environment. IEEE Commun Mag 46(5):118–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Wamser F, Staehle D, Prokopec J, Maeder A, Tran-Gia P (2012) Utilizing buffered YouTube playtime for QoE-oriented scheduling in OFDMA networks. In: Proceedings of the 24th international teletraffic congress, pp 113–120Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Youtube press room—statistics. (last accessed Oct 2012).
  70. 70.
    Zhang J, Ansari N (2011) On assuring end-to-end QoE in next generation networks: challenges and a possible solution. IEEE Commun Mag 49(7):185–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Zinner T, Klein D, Hoßfeld T (2012) User-centric network-application interaction for live HD video streaming. In: 4th international conference on mobile networks and management (MONAMI 2012), Hamburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raimund Schatz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Markus Fiedler
    • 2
  • Lea Skorin-Kapov
    • 3
  1. 1.Telecommunications Research Center Vienna (FTW)ViennaAustria
  2. 2.Blekinge Institute of Technology (BTH)KarlskronaSweden
  3. 3.Faculty of Electrical Engineering and ComputingUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations