Advertisement

Self-propelled Mining Machine Monitoring System – Data Validation, Processing and Analysis

  • Radoslaw Zimroz
  • Jacek Wodecki
  • Robert Król
  • Marek Andrzejewski
  • Paweł Sliwinski
  • Pawel Stefaniak

Abstract

Self-propelled Mining Machines constitute large group of basic machines in underground copper ore mining in Poland. Depends on their purpose and design there are several key parameters that (according to mining companies suggestions) should be monitored and processed in order to assess machine efficiency, its condition, proper operation (according to manufacturer recommendation), human factors influence and so on. Several studies have been done regarding selection of parameters, developing algorithms of data processing, data storage and management and finally reporting and visualization of knowledge extracted from measured data. Although serious efforts have been done in this field, there is still some work to do. In this paper, a new look on the problem will be presented including data acquisition process validation, importance of data quality for automatic processing and analysis. Finally new approach for signal analysis will be proposed and compared with already existing parameters. Also kind of target re-definition attempt will be discussed. All discussed issues will be illustrated using real data acquired during machine operation.

Keywords

Self-Propelled Mining Machine Monitoring System Data Processing Data Analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    The I2Mine Website (Innovative Technologies and Concepts for the Intelligent Deep Mine of the Future), i2mine.eu/ Google Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Kicki, J., Dyczko, A.: The concept of automation and monitoring of the production process in an underground mine. In: New Techniques and Technologies in Mining - Proceedings of the School of Underground Mining, pp. 245–253 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dyczko, et al.: Koncepcja monitoringu i transmisji danych technologicznych pracy samojezdnych maszyn górniczych w KGHM Polska Miedź S.A. unpublished technical report prepared for KGHM PM SA (in Polish)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bartelmus, W.: Condition monitoring of open cast mining machinery, published by Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Czajkowski, A., et al.: Work monitoring system in drilling and bolting. In: II International Copper Ore Mining Congress, VII 2012: conference papers, Lubin, pp. 16–18 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Okrent, K.: Studying the impact of the drilling process on the durability of cutting tools. PhD Thesis (in Polish), http://winntbg.bg.agh.edu.pl/rozprawy2/10566/full10566.pdf
  8. 8.
    Thompson, R.J., Visser, A.T., Heyns, P.S., Hugo, D.: Mine road maintenance management using haul truck response measurements. Institution of Mining and Metallurgy. Transactions. Section A: Mining Technology 115(4), 123–128 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eggers, B.L., Heyns, P.S., Stander, C.J.: Using computed order tracking to detect gear condition aboard a dragline. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 107(2), 115–122 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kohler, J.L., Sottile Jr., J., Cawley, J.C.: On-board electrical diagnostic system to improve the availability of continuous mining machines. Mining Engineering 46(8), 987–990 (1994)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Luo, C., Li, W., Wang, Y., Fan, Q., Yang, H.: A distributed positioning detection method of shearer under wireless sensor networks. Journal of Computational Information Systems 9(9), 3619–3626 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zimroz, R., Bartelmus, W.: Application of adaptive filtering for weak impulsive signal recovery for bearings local damage detection in complex mining mechanical systems working under condition of varying load. In: 2012 Diffusion and Defect Data Pt.B: Solid State Phenomena, vol. 180, pp. 250–257 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McBain, J., Timusk, M.: Software Architecture for Condition Monitoring of Mobile Underground Mining Machinery A framework Extensible to Intelligent Signal Processing and Analysis. In: 2012 IEEE Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, PHM, pp. 1–12 (2012), doi:10.1109/ICPHM.2012.6299543Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ralston, J.C., Hainsworth, D.W., McPhee, R.J., Reid, D.C., Hargrave, C.O.: Application of signal processing technology for automatic underground coal mining machinery. In: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 2, pp. II - 52–II - 249 (2003), doi:10.1109/ICASSP.2003.1202341Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jabłoński, A., Barszcz, T., Bielecka, M.: Automatic validation of vibration signals in wind farm distributed monitoring systems. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation 44(10), 1954–1967 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jabłoński, A., Barszcz, T.: Robust fragmentation of vibration signals for comparative analysis in signal validation. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference Condition Monitoring of Machinery in Non-stationnary Operations (CMMNO), pp. s.451–s.460. Springer (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kępski, P., Barszcz, T.: Validation of vibration signals for diagnostics of mining machinery. Diagnostyka 4(64), 25–30 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jablonski, A., Barszcz, T.: Validation of vibration measurements for heavy duty machinery diagnostics. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 38(1), 248–263 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ray, A.: An introduction to sensor signal validation in redundant measurement systems. IEEE Control Systems 11(2), 44–49 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bartkowiak, A., Zimroz, R.: Data dimension reduction and visualization with application to multidimensional gearbox diagnostics data: Comparison of several methods. Diffusion and Defect Data Pt.B: Solid State Phenomena 180, 177–184 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bartkowiak, A., Zimroz, R.: Outliers analysis and one class classification approach for planetary gearbox diagnosis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 305(1), art. no. 012031 (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zimroz, R., Bartkowiak, A.: Two simple multivariate procedures for monitoring planetary gearboxes in non-stationary operating conditions. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 38(1), 237–247 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Radoslaw Zimroz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jacek Wodecki
    • 2
  • Robert Król
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marek Andrzejewski
    • 3
  • Paweł Sliwinski
    • 3
  • Pawel Stefaniak
    • 1
  1. 1.Machinery Systems DivisionWroclaw University of TechnologyWroclawPoland
  2. 2.KGHM CUPRUM LtdWrocławPoland
  3. 3.KGHM Polska Miedź SALubinPoland

Personalised recommendations