Advertisement

Psychological Anthropomorphism of Robots

Measuring Mind Perception and Humanity in Japanese Context
  • Hiroko Kamide
  • Friederike Eyssel
  • Tatsuo Arai
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8239)

Abstract

Using a representative sample, we explored the validity of measures of psychological anthropomorphism in Japanese context. We did so by having participants evaluate both robots and human targets regarding “mind perception” (Gray et al., 2007) and “human essence” (Haslam, 2006)” , respectively. Data from 1,200 Japanese participants confirmed the factor structure of the measures and their overall good psychometric quality. Moreover, the findings emphasize the important role of valence for humanity attribution to both people and robots. Clearly, the proposed self-report measures enlarge the existing repertoire of scales to assess psychological anthropomorphism of robots in Japanese context.

Keywords

Anthropomorphism Robots Japanese Mind Perception Human Essence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bartneck, C., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., Nomura, T.: The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots. AI and Society 21, 217–230 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bartneck, C., Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, T., Kato, K.: A cross-cultural study on attitude towards robots. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shibata, T., Wada, K., Tanie, K.: Tabulation and analysis of questionnaire results of subjective evaluation of seal robot in Japan, U.K., Sweden and Italy. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, New Orleans (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bartneck, C.: Who like androids more: Japanese or US Americans? In: Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2008, Munchen, pp. 553–557 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Epley, N., Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J.T.: On Seeing Human: A threefactor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review 114, 864–886 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J.T., Epley, N.: Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science 5, 219–232 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scholl, B.J., Tremoulet, P.D.: Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Science 4, 200–209 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gray, H.M., Gray, K., Wegner, D.M.: Dimensions of mind perception. Science 315, 619 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haslam, N.: Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review 10, 252–264 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gray, K., Knobe, J., Sheskin, M., Bloom, P., Barrett, L.F.: More than a body: Mind perception and the surprising nature of objectification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101(6), 1207–1220 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bartneck, C., Croft, E., Kulic, D., Zoghbi, S.: Measurement instruments for the anthropo-morphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 1, 71–81 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eyssel, F., Kuchenbrandt, D., Hegel, F., de Ruiter, L.: Activating elicited agent knowledge: How robot and user features shape the perception of social robots. In: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2012), pp. 851–857 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eyssel, F., Reich, N.: Loneliness makes my heart grow fonder (of robots)? On the effects of loneliness on psychological anthropomorphism. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2013), pp. 121–122 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eyssel, F., Kuchenbrandt, D., Bobinger, S.: Effects of anticipated human-robot interaction and predictability of robot behavior on perceptions of anthropomorphism. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2011), pp. 61–67 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eyssel, F., Kuchenbrandt, D., Bobinger, S., de Ruiter, L., Hegel, F.: ‘If you sound like me, you must be more human’: On the interplay of robot and user features on human-robot acceptance and anthropomorphism. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2012), pp. 125–126 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jin, N., Yamagishi, T., Kiyonari, T.: Bilateral Dependency and the Minimal Group Paradigm. Japanese Journal of Psychology 67, 77–85 (1996) (in Japanese with an English abstract)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yamagishi, T., Cook, K.S., Watabe, M.: Uncertainty, trust, and commitment formation in the United States and Japan. American Journal of Sociology 104, 165–194 (1998)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yamagishi, T., Kikuchi, M., Kosugi, M.: Trust, gullibility, and social intelligence. Asian Journal of Social Psychology 2, 145–161 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kawachi, N., Koyuu, Y., Nagashima, K., Ohnishi, K., Hiura, R.: Home-use Robot wakamaru. Mitsubishi Juko Giho 40(5), 270–273 (2003) (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kaneko, K., Kanehiro, F., Kajita, S., Hirukawa, H., Kawasaki, T., Hirata, M., Akachi, K., Isozumi, T.: Humanoid Robot HRP-2. In: Proc. of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, New Orleans, pp. 1083–1090 (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nakaoka, S., Kanehiro, F., Miura, K., Morisawa, M., Fujiwara, K., Kaneko, K., Kajita, S., Hirukawa, H.: Creating facial motions of Cybernetic Human HRP-4C. In: Proc. IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Paris (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    Ogawa, K., Bartneck, C., Sakamoto, D., Kanda, T., Ono, T., Ishiguro, H.: Can An Android Persuade You? In: Proc. 18th International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 553–557 (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Theeravithayangkura, C., Takubo, T., Ohara, K., Mae, Y., Arai, T.: Dynamic Rolling-Walk Motion by the Limb Mechanism Robot ASTERISK. Advanced Robotics 25(1-2), 75–91 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kamide, H., Kawabe, K., Shigemi, S., Arai, T.: Development of a Psychological Scale for General Impressions of Humanoid. Advanced Robotics 17(1), 3–17 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Eyssel, F., Kuchenbrandt, D.: Social categorization of social robots: Anthropomorphism as a function of robot group membership. British Journal of Social Psychology 51, 724–731 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroko Kamide
    • 1
  • Friederike Eyssel
    • 2
  • Tatsuo Arai
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Engineering ScienceOsaka UniversityToyonakaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Psychology, Center of Excellence in Cognitive Interaction TechnologyUniversity of BielefeldBielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations