Advertisement

Partridge: An Effective System for the Automatic Cassification of the Types of Academic Papers

  • James Ravenscroft
  • Maria Liakata
  • Amanda Clare
Conference paper

Abstract

Partridge is a system that enables intelligent search for academic papers by allowing users to query terms within sentences designating a particular core scientific concept (e.g. Hypothesis, Result, etc). The system also automatically classifies papers according to article types (e.g. Review, Case Study). Here, we focus on the latter aspect of the system. For each paper, Partridge automatically extracts the full paper content from PDF files, converts it to XML, determines sentence boundaries, automatically labels the sentences with core scientific concepts, and then uses a random forest model to classify the paper type. We show that the type of a paper can be reliably predicted by a model which analyses the distribution of core scientific concepts within the sentences of the paper. We discuss the appropriateness of many of the existing paper types used by major journals, and their corresponding distributions. Partridge is online and available for use, includes a browser-friendly bookmarklet for new paper submission, and demonstrates a range of possibilities for more intelligent search in the scientific literature. The Partridge instance and further information about the project can be found at http://papro.org.uk.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Leverhulme Trust for the support to Dr Liakata’s Early Career Fellowship and also EMBL-EBI, Cambridge UK for the facilities offered to Dr Liakata.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Liakata, S. Saha, S. Dobnik, C. Batchelor, D. Rebholz-Schuhmann, Bioinformatics pp. 991–1000 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Liakata, S. Teufel, A. Siddharthan, C. Batchelor, in Proceedings of LREC’10 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Constantin, S. Pettier, A. Voronkov, in Proceedings of the 13th ACM Symposium on Document Engineering (Doc Eng) (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Liakata, L.N. Soldatova, et al., in Proceedings of the Workshop on Current Trends in Biomedical Natural Language Processing (Association for, Computational Linguistics, 2009), pp. 193–200Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. Breiman, Machine, Learning pp. 5–32 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Demšar, B. Zupan, G. Leban, T. Curk, in Knowledge Discovery in Databases PKDD 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3202, ed. by J.F. Boulicaut, F. Esposito, F. Giannotti, D. Pedreschi. Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana (Springer, 2004), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3202, pp. 537–539. DOI  10.1007/b100704. URL http://www.springerlink.com/index/G58613YV08BX48QJ.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Ravenscroft
    • 1
  • Maria Liakata
    • 2
  • Amanda Clare
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceAberystwyth UniversityAberystwythUK
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of WarwickAberystwythUK

Personalised recommendations