Integrated Strategic Asset Management: Frameworks and Dimensions
Comprehensive asset management should be embedded in organisations through the temporal, organisational and spatial dimensions. We examine how an integrated approach to asset management might consider the whole range of interrelations and interactions of these dimensions. Asset management should take into account the operational and the strategic management of the asset (time dimension) as well as organisational, technology and information and human factors management (organisational dimension). Furthermore, the inclusion of management topics arising from interaction between assets, stakeholders and clients, ecological environments, industry, and government is critical (spatial dimension). We argue that a strategic standpoint for asset management establishes a framework that includes governance, policy, tactical and operational aspects that are brought into a comprehensive integrated approach. Prior frameworks have identified the various elements that need to be considered. However, they have not addressed their operationalisation and neglected governance and broader contextual factors in building an asset management model. We present an integrated asset management approach to developing a capability maturity model which addresses all three outlined dimensions. To do so it is necessary to define asset management process areas, capability and maturity levels, and capability and maturity indicators for each process area.
KeywordsMaturity model Indicators Operationalisation Governance
This work was developed within the CRC for Infrastructure and Engineering Asset Management, established and supported under the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres Programme.
- 1.Amadi-Echendu J, Willett RJ, Brown KA, Lee J, Mathew J, Vyas N, Yang B-S (2007) What is engineering asset management? In: Proceedings 2nd world congress on engineering asset management and the 4th international conference on condition monitoring, Harrogate, United Kingdom, pp 116–129Google Scholar
- 2.Australian Asset Management Collaborative Group (AAMCoG) (2011) Guide to integrated strategic asset managementGoogle Scholar
- 3.Australian Procurement and Construction Council (2007) Australian and New Zealand Government framework for sustainable procurementGoogle Scholar
- 4.Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute (2006) CMMI for development, version 1.2, Carnegie Mellon University, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
- 5.CIEAM (2012) http://www.cieam.com/site/2/about-us. Last accessed on 25 Feb 2012
- 6.Dunckel H (1996) Psychologisch orientierte Systemanalyse im Büro. Hans Huber, BernGoogle Scholar
- 7.Hacker W (1995) Arbeitstätigkeitsanalyse—Analyse und Bewertung psychischer Arbeitsanforderungen. Asanger, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
- 8.Laue M, Brown KA, Keast R (2011) Strategic and human issues in asset management models. In: Proceedings 6th world congress on engineering asset management, Cincinnati, Ohio, USAGoogle Scholar
- 9.Mardiasmo D, Tywoniak S, Brown K, Burgess K (2008) Asset management and governance—an analysis of fleet management process issues in an asset-intensive organization. In: International conference on infrastructure systems: building networks for a brighter future. Rotterdam, Netherlands, 10–12 NovGoogle Scholar
- 10.Scott CM (2009) Green economics. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 11.Tywoniak S, Rosqvist T, Mardiasmo D, Kivits RA (2008) Towards an integrated perspective on fleet asset management: engineering and governance considerations. In: Jinji G, Lee J, Ni J, Ma L, Mathew J (eds) Proceedings 3rd world congress on engineering asset management and intelligent maintenance systems conference (WCEAM-IMS 2008): engineering asset management—a foundation for sustainable development, Beijing, China, pp 1553–1567Google Scholar
- 12.Woodhouse J (2001) Asset management. John Woodhouse Partnership LtdGoogle Scholar