Verification of a Dynamic Management Protocol for Cloud Applications

  • Rim Abid
  • Gwen Salaün
  • Francesco Bongiovanni
  • Noel De Palma
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8172)

Abstract

Cloud applications are composed of a set of interconnected software components distributed over several virtual machines. There is a need for protocols that can dynamically reconfigure such distributed applications. In this paper, we present a novel protocol, which is able to resolve dependencies in these applications, by (dis)connecting and starting/stopping components in a specific order. These virtual machines interact through a publish-subscribe communication media and reconfigure themselves upon demand in a decentralised fashion. Designing such protocols is an error-prone task. Therefore, we decided to specify the protocol with the LNT value-passing process algebra and to verify it using the model checking tools available in the CADP toolbox. As a result, the introduction of formal techniques and tools help to deeply revise the protocol, and these improvements have been taken into account in the corresponding Java implementation.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Allen, R., Douence, R., Garlan, D.: Specifying and Analyzing Dynamic Software Architectures. In: Astesiano, E. (ed.) ETAPS 1998 and FASE 1998. LNCS, vol. 1382, pp. 21–37. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boyer, F., Gruber, O., Salaün, G.: Specifying and Verifying the SYNERGY Reconfiguration Protocol with LOTOS NT and CADP. In: Butler, M., Schulte, W. (eds.) FM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6664, pp. 103–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cansado, A., Canal, C., Salaün, G., Cubo, J.: A Formal Framework for Structural Reconfiguration of Components under Behavioural Adaptation. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 263, 95–110 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Champelovier, D., Clerc, X., Garavel, H., Guerte, Y., Powazny, V., Lang, F., Serwe, W., Smeding, G.: Reference Manual of the LOTOS NT to LOTOS Translator (Version 5.4). INRIA/VASY (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chapman, C., Emmerich, W., Galán Márquez, F., Clayman, S., Galis, A.: Software Architecture Definition for On-demand Cloud Provisioning. In: Proc. of HPDC 2010, pp. 61–72. ACM Press (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Etchevers, X., Coupaye, T., Boyer, F., de Palma, N.: Self-Configuration of Distributed Applications in the Cloud. In: Proc. of CLOUD 2011, pp. 668–675. IEEE Computer Society (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Etchevers, X., Coupaye, T., Boyer, F., De Palma, N., Salaün, G.: Automated Configuration of Legacy Applications in the Cloud. In: Proc. of UCC 2011, pp. 170–177. IEEE Computer Society (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fischer, J., Majumdar, R., Esmaeilsabzali, S.: Engage: A Deployment Management System. In: Proc. of PLDI 2012, pp. 263–274. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garavel, H., Lang, F., Mateescu, R., Serwe, W.: CADP 2010: A Toolbox for the Construction and Analysis of Distributed Processes. In: Abdulla, P.A., Leino, K.R.M. (eds.) TACAS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6605, pp. 372–387. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldsack, P., Guijarro, J., Loughran, S., Coles, A., Farrell, A., Lain, A., Murray, P., Toft, P.: The SmartFrog Configuration Management Framework. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev. 43(1), 16–25 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    ISO/IEC. LOTOS — A Formal Description Technique Based on the Temporal Ordering of Observational Behaviour. International Standard 8807, International Organization for Standardization — Information Processing Systems — Open Systems Interconnection (1989)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kramer, J., Magee, J.: Analysing Dynamic Change in Distributed Software Architectures. IEE Proceedings - Software 145(5), 146–154 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Magee, J., Kramer, J.: Dynamic Structure in Software Architectures. In: Proc. of SIGSOFT FSE 1996, pp. 3–14. ACM (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Magee, J., Kramer, J., Giannakopoulou, D.: Behaviour Analysis of Software Architectures. In: Proc. of WICSA 1999. IFIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 140, pp. 35–50. Kluwer (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mateescu, R., Thivolle, D.: A Model Checking Language for Concurrent Value-Passing Systems. In: Cuellar, J., Sere, K. (eds.) FM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5014, pp. 148–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mirkovic, J., Faber, T., Hsieh, P., Malayandisamu, G., Malavia, R.: DADL: Distributed Application Description Language. USC/ISI Technical Report ISI-TR-664 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Salaün, G.: Generation of Service Wrapper Protocols from Choreography Specifications. In: Proc. of SEFM 2008, pp. 313–322. IEEE Computer Society (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Salaün, G., Boyer, F., Coupaye, T., De Palma, N., Etchevers, X., Gruber, O.: An Experience Report on the Verification of Autonomic Protocols in the Cloud. ISSE 9(2), 105–117 (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Salaün, G., Etchevers, X., De Palma, N., Boyer, F., Coupaye, T.: Verification of a Self-configuration Protocol for Distributed Applications in the Cloud. In: Proc. of SAC 2012, pp. 1278–1283. ACM Press (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wermelinger, M., Lopes, A., Fiadeiro, J.L.: A Graph Based Architectural (Re)configuration Language. In: Proc. of ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2001, pp. 21–32. ACM (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rim Abid
    • 1
    • 3
  • Gwen Salaün
    • 2
    • 3
  • Francesco Bongiovanni
    • 1
  • Noel De Palma
    • 1
  1. 1.UJFGrenobleFrance
  2. 2.Grenoble INPFrance
  3. 3.Inria Rhône-AlpesGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations