Advertisement

Discussions of Part I Chapters

  • Luc Trouche
  • Jonathan M. Borwein
  • John Monaghan
Chapter
Part of the Mathematics Education Library book series (MELI, volume 110)

Abstract

This chapter is an opportunity for one of the authors of this book to question the other two authors in the light of issues raised in Chaps.  2 5. It constitutes both a follow-up to discussions between authors which occurred over the writing process, and emergent issues—new discussions once the book was almost complete. Some fundamental issues are addressed, about the birth of mathematics (and its deep links with the birth of writing), the relationships between mathematics and other sciences, the interactions between conjecture and proof, and the role of visualisation and of gestures. The text is kept short in order to provoke the readers to reflect on these issues rather than for the authors to ‘provide answers’.

Keywords

Mathematical Object Steam Engine Dynamic Geometry Software Archaic Period Computer Science Teaching 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Chevallard, Y. (2005). Steps towards a new epistemology in mathematics education. In M. Bosch (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 21–44).Google Scholar
  2. Debray, R. (2001). Dieu, un itinéraire. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
  3. Debray, R. (2013). Le stupéfiant image: De la grotte Chauvet au centre Pompidou. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  4. Descartes, R. (1637). Discours de la méthode pour bien conduire sa raison et chercher la vérité dans les sciences. Plus la Dioptrique. Les Meteores. & la Geometrie qui sont des essais de cette Methode. Leyde : I. Maire. Retrieved from http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b86069594/f5.image.r=.langEN
  5. Eisenberg, T., & Dreyfus, T. (1991). On the reluctance to visualize in mathematics. In W. Zimmermann & S. Cunningham (Eds.), Visualization in teaching and learning mathematic (Notes Series, Vol. 19, pp. 25–37). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar
  6. Englund, R.K. (1998). Texts from the Late Uruk Period. In J. Bauer, R.K. Englund, & M. Krebernik (Eds.), Mesopotamien. Späturuk-Zeit und Frühdynastische Zeit, (Vol. 160, pp. 15–233). Freibourg, Göttingen: OBO.Google Scholar
  7. Hanna, G., & de Villiers, M. (Eds.). (2012). Proof and proving in mathematics education. Springer: The 19th ICMI Study.Google Scholar
  8. Kahane, J.-P. (Dir.). (2002). L’enseignement des sciences mathématiques. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
  9. Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations. The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Le Lionnais, F. (avec la collaboration de Jean Brette). (1983). Les nombres remarquables. Paris: Editions Hermann.Google Scholar
  11. Maschieroni, L. (1797). La Geometria del Compasso. Pavia: Pietro Galeazzi.Google Scholar
  12. Maschietto, M., & Trouche, L. (2010). Mathematics learning and tools from theoretical, historical and practical points of view: The productive notion of mathematics laboratories, ZDM. The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42(1), 33–47.Google Scholar
  13. Netz, R. (1999). The shaping of deduction in Greek mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Nissen, H. J., Damerow, P., & Englund, R. (1993). Archaic bookkeeping. Writing and techniques of economic administration in the ancient near east. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Singh, S. (2000). The code book: The secret history of codes and code-breaking. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
  16. Trouche, L. (1998a). Faire des mathématiques avec des calculatrices symboliques, conjecturer et prouver. 37 variations sur un thème imposé. Montpellier: IREM, Université Montpellier 2.Google Scholar
  17. Trouche, L. (1998b). Regards croisés sur quelques aspects de l’environnement TI-92. Montpellier: IREM, Université Montpellier 2.Google Scholar
  18. Trouche, L. (2000). New technological environments: new constraints, new opportunities for the teacher. The International Journal of Computer Algebra in Mathematics Education, 7(3), 165–180.Google Scholar
  19. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Wertsch, J.V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luc Trouche
    • 1
  • Jonathan M. Borwein
    • 2
  • John Monaghan
    • 3
  1. 1.Institut Français de l’EducationEcole Normale Supérieure de LyonLyonFrance
  2. 2.Centre for Computer Assisted Research Mathematics and its ApplicationsSchool of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Mathematical SciencesUniversity of AgderKristiansandNorway

Personalised recommendations