Some Remarks on Complex Information Systems over Ontological Graphs

  • Krzysztof Pancerz
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 242)

Abstract

In the paper, we consider information systems, from the Pawlak’s perspective, as the knowledge representation systems. In our approach, we develop complex information systems over ontological graphs in which attribute values are local ontological graphs of ontologies assigned to attributes. Basic notions and some properties of such systems are considered analogously to those known from classic information systems in rough set theory.

Keywords

information systems ontological graphs rough sets 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brachman, R.J.: What IS-A is and isn’t: An analysis of taxonomic links in semantic networks. Computer 16(10), 30–36 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chaffin, R., Herrmann, D.J.: The nature of semantic relations: A comparison of two approaches. In: Evens, M. (ed.) Relational Models of the Lexicon: Representing Knowledge in Semantic Networks, pp. 289–334. Cambridge University Press, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chaffin, R., Herrmann, D.J., Winston, M.: An empirical taxonomy of part-whole relations: Effects of part-whole relation type on relation identification. Language and Cognitive Processes 3(1), 17–48 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cios, K., Pedrycz, W., Swiniarski, R.W., Kurgan, L.A.: Data mining. A knowledge discovery approach. Springer, New York (2007)MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Codd, E.F.: A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Communications of the ACM 13(6), 377–387 (1970)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Conrad, C.: Cognitive economy in semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology 92(2), 149–154 (1972)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Köhler, J., Philippi, S., Specht, M., Rüegg, A.: Ontology based text indexing and querying for the semantic web. Knowledge-Based Systems 19, 744–754 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Milstead, J.L.: Standards for relationships between subject indexing terms. In: Bean, C.A., Green, R. (eds.) Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge. Information Science and Knowledge Management, vol. 2, pp. 53–66. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neches, R., Fikes, R.E., Finin, T., Gruber, T.R., Patil, R., Senator, T., Swartout, W.R.: Enabling technology for knowledge sharing. AI Magazine 12(3), 36–56 (1991)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pancerz, K.: Dominance-based rough set approach for decision systems over ontological graphs. In: Ganzha, M., Maciaszek, L., Paprzycki, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS 2012), Wroclaw, Poland, pp. 323–330 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pancerz, K.: Toward information systems over ontological graphs. In: Yao, J., Yang, Y., Słowiński, R., Greco, S., Li, H., Mitra, S., Polkowski, L. (eds.) RSCTC 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7413, pp. 243–248. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pancerz, K.: Decision rules in simple decision systems over ontological graphs. In: Burduk, R., Jackowski, K., Kurzynski, M., Wozniak, M., Zolnierek, A. (eds.) CORES 2013. AISC, vol. 226, pp. 111–120. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pancerz, K.: Semantic relationships and approximations of sets: An ontological graph based approach. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human System Interaction, HSI 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Kluwer Academic Publishers (1991)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Perchant, A., Bloch, I.: Fuzzy morphisms between graphs. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 128(2), 149–168 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Slowinski, R., Vanderpooten, D.: A generalized definition of rough approximations based on similarity. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 12 (2000)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Storey, V.C.: Understanding semantic relationships. The International Journal on Very Large Data Bases 2, 455–488 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tversky, A.: Features of similarity. Psychological Review 84, 327–352 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Winston, M.E., Chaffin, R., Herrmann, D.: A taxonomy of part-whole relations. Cognitive Science 11(4), 417–444 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Krzysztof Pancerz
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Management and Administration in ZamośćZamośćPoland
  2. 2.University of Information Technology and Management in RzeszówRzeszówPoland

Personalised recommendations