Advertisement

Materiality and Assurance: Building the Link

  • Chiara MioEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter provides a comprehensive discussion of materiality and assurance in the context of Integrated Reporting (IR). On the one hand, materiality has gained much importance following the introduction of IR, since one of the main objectives of this innovative form of reporting is to reach conciseness. On the other hand, assurance may play a crucial role in conferring reliability to the materiality determination process proposed by the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) and to the whole process of IR. This chapter provides a discussion of the state of the art of materiality and assurance in the context of non-financial information and, more specifically, IR. It also points out some of the main challenges the IIRC materiality determination process will have to face in order for companies to implement it correctly. Finally, drawing on the peculiarities of IR, the chapter points out some issues that will have to be discussed regarding assurance and its effectiveness. Some insights for future development of the debate are also proposed.

Keywords

Financial Capital Global Reporting Initiative Audit Firm Sustainability Report Material Issue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. AASB (2010) Standard AASB 1031, Prepared on 23 February 2010 by the staff of the Australian Accounting Standards Board. http://www.cpaaustralia.com.au/cps/rde/xbcr/cpa-site/aasb_1031_materiality.pdf. Accessed 20 Jul 2013
  2. AccountAbility (2006) Guidance note on the principles of materiality, completeness and responsiveness as they relate to the AA1000 assurance standard. http://www.accountability.org/images/content/1/8/189/AA1000%20Guidance%20Note%20-%20Low%20Res.pdf. Accessed 20 Jul 2013
  3. AccountAbility (2008) AA1000 accountability principles standard 2008. http://www.accountability.org/about-us/publications/aa1000.html. Accessed 20 Jul 2013
  4. Berthelot S, Cormier D, Magnam M (2003) Environmental disclosure research: review and synthesis. J Account Lit 22:1–44Google Scholar
  5. Brammer S, Pavelin S (2004) Voluntary social disclosures by large UK companies. Bus Ethics Eur Rev 13(2/3):86–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deloitte (2012) Does materiality matter? Should the principle of materiality be applied more consistently to non-financial reporting? http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-UnitedStates/Local%20Assets/Documents/us_scc_materialitydebate_032712.pdf. Accessed 20 Jul 2013
  7. Dhaliwal DS, Li OZ, Tsang A, Yang GY (2011) Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: the initiation of corporate social reporting. Account Rev 86(1):59–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eccles RG, Krzus MP, Rogers J, Serafeim G (2012) The need for sector-specific materiality and sustainability reporting standards. J Appl Corp Finance 24(2):8–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Faux J (2012) Environmental event materiality and decision making. Manag Audit J 27(3):284–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. GRI (2013a) G4 sustainability reporting guidelines—reporting principles and standard disclosures. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRIG4-Part1-Reporting-Principles-and-Standard-Disclosures.pdf. Accessed 20 Jul 2013
  11. GRI (2013b) G4 sustainability reporting guidelines—implementation manual. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRIG4-Part2-Implementation-Manual.pdf. Accessed 20 Jul 2013
  12. Guthrie J, Parker LD (1989) Corporate social reporting: a rebuttal of legitimacy theory. Account Bus Res 19(76):343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guthrie J, Parker LD (1990) Corporate social disclosure practice: a comparative international analysis. Adv Publ Interest Account 3:159–176Google Scholar
  14. IFAC (2011) Sustainability framework 2.0. http://www.ifac.org/publications-resources/ifac-sustainability-framework-20. Accessed 20 Jul 2013
  15. IIRC (2013a) Consultation draft of the international <IR> framework. IIRC, New York. http://www.theiirc.org/consultationdraft2013. Accessed 20 Jul 2013
  16. IIRC (2013b) Business model–background paper for < IR>. IIRC, New York. http://www.theiirc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Business_Model.pdf. Accessed 20 Jul 2013
  17. IIRC (2013c) Materiality - background paper for <IR>. IIRC, New York. http://www.theiirc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/IR-Background-Paper-Materiality.pdf. Accessed 20 Jul 2013
  18. ISA (2009) Materiality in planning and performing audit. http://www.aicpa.org/research/standards/auditattest/downloadabledocuments/au-c-00320.pdf. Accessed 20 Jul 2013
  19. ISAE3000 (2011) ISAE3000 (Revised), assurance engagements other than audits or reviews of historical financial information. http://www.ifac.org/sites/default/files/publications/exposure-drafts/IAASB_ISAE_3000_ED.pdf. Accessed 20 Jul 2013
  20. Lydenberg (2012) On materiality and sustainability: the value of disclosure in the capital markets. Initiative for responsible investment hauser center for nonprofit organizations at harvard university. http://hausercenter.org/iri/wpcontent/uploads/2010/05/OnMateriality_Final.pdf. Accessed 20 Jul 2013
  21. Messier WF, Martinov-Bennie N, Eilifsen A (2005) A review and integration of empirical research on materiality: two decades later. Audit J Pract Theory 24(2):153–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Patten DM (2002) The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note. Account Organ Soc 27(8):763–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tuttle B, Coller M, Plumlee R (2002) The effect of misstatements on decisions of financial statement users: an experimental investigation of auditor materiality thresholds. Audit J Pract Theory. 11–27Google Scholar
  24. Wilmshurst TD, Frost GR (2000) Corporate environmental reporting: a test of legitimacy theory. Account Audit Account J 13(1):10–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementCa’ Foscari University of VeniceVeniceItaly

Personalised recommendations