Towards Alternatives for Agent Based Control in Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems

Conference paper

Abstract

Most researchers in reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMSs) have used the agent based control (ABC) approach, because the capabilities of agent based software and their development platforms make it easier and quicker to test their research. Due to the reluctance of industries to adopt ABC, this paper considers the factors that would affect the choice of alternatives for ABC, with an emphasis on cell-level control rather than on factory-level control or production planning related aspects. The paper shows that design considerations include reconfiguration level, self-reconfiguration intelligence and controller platform splitting. Some design choices will lead to ABC having significant advantages, while others will allow the use of software approaches more often used in industry.

Keywords

Reconfigurable agent-based control 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Leitão, P.: Agent-based distributed manufacturing control: A state of the art survey. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 22(7), 979–991 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leitão, P., Restivo, F.: ADACOR: A holonic architecture for agile and adaptive manufacturing control. Computers in Industry 57, 121–130 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marik, V.: Industrial adoption of agent-based technologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems 20(1), 27–35 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koren, Y., Shiptalni, M.: Design of reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 29, 130–141 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Christensen, J.: Holonic Manufacturing Systems: Initial architecture and standards directions. In: Proceedings of the First European Conference on Holonic Manufacturing Systems, Hanover, Germany (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Le Roux, A.: Control of a Conveyor System for a Reconfigurable Manufacturing Cell. MScEng Mechanical Thesis, Stellenbosch University, South Africa (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bongard, J., Zykov, V., Lipson, H.: Resilient machines through continuous self-modeling. Science 314, 1118–1121 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van Brussel, H., Wyns, J., Valckenaers, P.: Bongaerts, l., Peeters, P.: Reference architecture for holonic manufacturing systems: PROSA. Computers in Industry 37, 255–274 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lepuschitz, W., Zoitl, A., Vallée, M., Merdan, M.: Toward Self-Reconfiguration of Manufacturing Systems Using Automation Agents. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part C: Applications and Reviews 41(1), 52–69 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brennan, R.: Toward Real-Time Distributed Intelligent Control: A Survey of Research Themes and Applications. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part C: Applications and Reviews 37(5), 744–765 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lepuschitz, W., Vallee, M., Merdan, M., Vrba, P., Resch, J.: Integration of a Heterogeneous Low Level Control in a Multi-Agent System for the Manufacturing Domain. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation, pp. 1–8 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hegny, I., Hummer, O., Zoitl, A., Koppensteiner, G., Merdan, M.: Integrating Software Agents and IEC 61499 Realtime Control for Reconfigurable Distributed Manufacturing Systems. In: IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Embedded Systems, pp. 249–252 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Christensen, J.: HMS/FB Architecture and its Implementation. In: Deen, S.M. (ed.) Agent Based Manufacturing: Advances in the Holonic Approach, pp. 53–90. Springer (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kobus Hoffman
    • 1
  • Anton H. Basson
    • 1
  • Anro le Roux
    • 1
  1. 1.University of StellenboschStellenboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations