Using an Inflow Turbulence Generator for Leading Edge Noise Predictions

  • Thomas P. Lloyd
  • Mathieu Gruber
  • Stephen R. Turnock
  • Victor F. Humphrey
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Physics book series (SPPHY, volume 149)

Abstract

Inflow turbulence noise is often the dominant noise mechanism in turbomachines. It has been shown that the sound pressure level is related to the intensity and integral length scale of the turbulence. We utilise a methodology for generating turbulence with prescribed intensity and length scales within a detached eddy simulation. This is applied to a case of homogeneous isotropic turbulence impinging on a non-symmetric aerofoil at high Reynolds number (2.1×105). The sound pressure level is estimated using Curle’s compact acoustic analogy, and compared to experimental data and analytical estimates. The intensity of the inflow turbulence is higher than expected, though it exhibits approximately homogeneous and isotropic characteristics. While the general shape of the predicted noise spectrum is correct, the magnitude differs from the experimental results by up to 17 dB. Reasons for this are elaborated, and improved predictions based on a flat plate are presented.

Keywords

Large Eddy Simulation Turbulence Intensity Turbulent Boundary Layer Sound Pressure Level Suction Side 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Moreau, S., Roger, M.: Competing broadband noise mechanisms in low-speed axial fans. AIAA Journal 45, 48–57 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amiet, R.K.: Acoustic radiation from an airfoil in a turbulent stream. J. Sound Vibrat. 300, 407–420 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Devenport, W.J., Staubs, J.K., Glegg, S.A.: Sound radiation from real airfoils in turbulence. J. Sound Vibrat. 329, 3470–3483 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gruber, M.: Airfoil noise reduction by edge treatments. Ph.D. thesis, Uni. Southampton (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Christophe, J., Anthoine, J., Rambaud, P., Schram, C., Moreau, S.: Prediction of incoming turbulent noise using a combined / semi-empirical method and experimental validation. In: West-East High Speed Flow Field Conference, November 19-22 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deniau, H., Dufour, G., Boussuge, J.-F., Polacsek, C., Moreau, S.: Affordable compressible LES of airfoil-turbulence interaction in a free jet. AIAA Paper No. 2011-2707 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kornev, N.V., Kröger, H., Turnow, J., Hassel, E.: Synthesis of artificial turbulent fields with prescribed second-order statistics using the random spot method. Proc. App. Math. Mech. 7, 47–48 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Roger, M., Moreau, S.: Extensions and limitations of analytical airfoil broadband noise models. Int. J. Aeroac. 9, 273–306 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas P. Lloyd
    • 1
  • Mathieu Gruber
    • 2
  • Stephen R. Turnock
    • 1
  • Victor F. Humphrey
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering and the EnvironmentUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
  2. 2.Department of AcousticSnecma VillarocheMoissy-CramayelFrance

Personalised recommendations