Advertisement

An Affordance-Based Simulation Framework for Assessing Spatial Suitability

  • David Jonietz
  • Sabine Timpf
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8116)

Abstract

In their everyday decision processes, humans depend on their ability to evaluate the suitability of environmental objects for specific actions. Suitability can therefore be understood as an abstract quality that is determined by properties of both the human agent and the environment as well as the action to be performed. The notion of such mutual dependency relationships with regards to action potentials is closely related to the concept of affordances as proposed by Gibson (1977). In this paper, a conceptual framework is proposed for the simulation of human agents assessing spatial suitability. In our model, actions represent a central element and are modeled at different hierarchical levels of abstraction. Finally, a simulation of pedestrian route choice is presented as a case study in order to explain the assessment process.

Keywords

affordances activity theory spatial suitability walkability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Agrawal, A.W., Schlossberg, M., Irvin, K.: How Far, by Which Route and Why? A Spatial Analysis of Pedestrian Preference. Journal of Urban Design 13(1), 81–98 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alfonso, M.A.: To Walk or not to Walk? The Hierarchy of Walking Needs. Environment and Behaviour 37(6), 808–836 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gibson, J.J.: The theory of affordances. In: Shaw, R., Bransford, J. (eds.) Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology, pp. 67–82. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (1977)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston (1979)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heft, H.: Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James’s radical empiricism. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jonietz, D., Schuster, W., Timpf, S.: Modelling the Suitability of Urban Networks for Pedestrians: An Affordance-based Framework. In: Geographic Information Science at the Heart of Europe. LNGC, pp. 369–382 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jordan, T., Raubal, M., Gartrell, B., Egenhofer, M.: An affordance-based model of place in GIS. In: Eighth International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, July 11-15 (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kapadia, M., Singh, S., Hewlett, B., Faloutsos, P.: Egocentric Affordance Fields in Pedestrian Steering. In: I3D 2009 Proceedings of the 2009 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games, February 27- March 1 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kaptelinin, V., Kuutti, K., Bannon, L.: Activity theory: Basic concepts and applications. In: Blumenthal, B., Gornostaev, J., Unger, C. (eds.) EWHCI 1995. LNCS, vol. 1015, Springer, Heidelberg (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kemke, C.: About the ontology of actions. Technical report mccs- 01-328, Computing Research Laboratory, New Mexico State University (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim, N., Joo, J., Rothrock, L., Wysk, R., Son, Y.-J.: Human Behavioral Simulation Using Affordance-Based Agent Model. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction, Part I, HCII 2011. LNCS, vol. 6761, pp. 368–377. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koffka, K.: Principles of Gestalt psychology. Harcourt Brace, New York (1935)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leontiev, A.N.: Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey (1978)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Özer, Ö., Kubat, A.S.: Walking Initiatives: A Quantitative Movement Analysis. In: Proceedings, 6th International Space Syntax Symposium, Istanbul (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Park, S.: Defining, Measuring, and Evaluating Path Walkability, and Testing Its Impacts on Transit Users‘ Mode Choice and Walking Distance to the Station. Berkeley: Dissertations, University of California Transportation Center, UC Berkeley (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Raubal, M.: Ontology and epistemology for agent based wayfinding simulation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 15(7), 653–665 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Raubal, M., Moratz, R.: A functional model for affordance-based agents. In: Dagstuhl Seminar Towards Affordance-based Robot Control, Dagstuhl Castle, Germany, June 5-9 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Searle, J.R.: Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stoffregen, T.A.: Affordances as properties of the animal environment system. Ecological Psychology 15(2), 115–134 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Timpf, S.: Geographic Activity Models. In: Duckham, M., Goodchild, M., Worboys, M.F. (eds.) Foundations of Geographic Information Science, pp. 241–254. Taylor & Francis, London and New York (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Trypuz, R.: Formal Ontology of Action- A Unifying Approach. Wydawnictwo KUL, Lublin (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Turner, A., Penn, A.: Encoding natural movement as an agent-based system: an investigation into human pedestrian behaviour in the built environment. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 29, 473–490 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Turvey, M.T.: Affordances and prospective control: An outline of the ontology. Ecological Psychology 4(3), 173–187 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Varela, F.J., Thompson, E.: The embodied mind. MIT Press, Cambridge (1991)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vukmirovic, M.: Functional abilities of humans and identification of specific groups of pedestrians. In: Walk 21 XI International Conference on Walking and Liveable Communities, November 16-19, The Hague, Netherlands (2010)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Warren, W.H.: Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology 105(5), 683–703 (1984)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Jonietz
    • 1
  • Sabine Timpf
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for GeographyUniversity of AugsburgAugsburgGermany

Personalised recommendations