Abstract
Many archaeological structures, features, and artifacts can be detected with a magnetometer because the iron that they contain has been changed to a very magnetic form by some cultural process. Examples include the conversion of nonmagnetic iron ores into metallic iron, the modification of nonmagnetic clay into magnetic brick or ceramic inside a kiln or fireplace, or the creation of magnetic soil by biological action within organic soil. Additionally, some objects are detectable because they have been moved from their natural location by humans; this movement can result in an artificial concentration or depletion of magnetic materials: Examples include igneous stones (magnetic) that form the foundation of a building or nonmagnetic stones, such as limestone, in the foundation of a building where the soil is rather magnetic. A ditch that was dug into nonmagnetic subsoil, later to be refilled with magnetic topsoil, is another example. A magnetic survey locates features that are either more magnetic or less magnetic than their surroundings. Some practices for doing magnetic surveys are summarized here, along with information about understanding the magnetic maps that are created. Most of this information is for the person who is starting to do geophysical surveys. This section is written for the archaeologist, rather than the physicist. It is assumed here that either you will be doing this magnetic survey, or that you want to learn how to ask someone to do the survey for you. This discussion will emphasize Roman and Greek archaeology in the Mediterranean area. For a thorough review of the application of magnetic surveys to archaeological exploration, see the book by Aspinall et al. (Magnetometry for archaeologists. Altamira Press, Lanham, 2008).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aspinall A, Gaffney C, Schmidt A (2008) Magnetometry for archaeologists. Altamira Press, Lanham
Breiner S (1999) Applications manual for portable magnetometers. Geometrics, San Jose
Desvignes G, Tabbagh A, Benech C (1999) The determination of the depth of magnetic anomaly sources. Archaeol Prospect 6:85–105. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0763(199906)6:2<85::AID-ARP119>3.0.CO;2-I
Piro S, Campana S (eds) (2009) Seeing the unseen: geophysics and landscape archaeology. CRC Press, London
Acknowledgment
We thank Cristina Corsi (Universidade de Évora) and Frank Vermeulen (Universiteit Gent) for originating and coordinating the Radio-Past project and for inviting us to their 2011 workshop. We also appreciate the help that was given us by many Portuguese archaeologists during our stay at Ammaia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bevan, B.W., Smekalova, T.N. (2013). Magnetic Exploration of Archaeological Sites. In: Corsi, C., Slapšak, B., Vermeulen, F. (eds) Good Practice in Archaeological Diagnostics. Natural Science in Archaeology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01784-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01784-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01783-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01784-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)