Narrating the Digital: The Evolving Memento Mori

  • Stacey PitsillidesEmail author
  • Janis Jefferies
Part of the Human–Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)


This chapter builds on concepts of embodiment and considers our relationship to our bodies and environment(s) through the construct of ‘posthumanism.’ By commenting on the relationship between death and the body we consider how our digital remains, both literal and affectual, may take the role of legacy continuing on and engaging, in some essence, with the living. This will include a central discussion on how concepts of Cartesian Dualism and Transhumanism have led to a futile search for immortality, as developed by modern understandings of the writings of Rene Descartes. This idea of aiming for literal immortality verses engaging with questions of mortality and trying to understand the relevance of what is left behind to our lives is developed through a discussion of two artists approach to technically informed body modification and how this ‘development’ of the bodies both dead and alive further informs the topic of Posthumanism. This leads on to the consideration of Tony Walters (1996) work on a New Model of Grief within which he discusses the importance within the bereavement process of constructing a durable biography. This idea has been developed through the psychological concept of continuing bonds, a topic that has been vastly altered by the new digital landscape becoming the norm rather than the exception. This chapter also seeks to reflect on how theories becoming prevalent within the Death Studies arena may provide a new framework for the developing field of End of Life research within Human Computer Interaction.


Human Computer Interaction Dead Body Final Disposition Cartesian Dualism Death Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aalto Media Factory. (2012). Stelarc: Circulating flesh. Online lecture: Accessed 1 Dec 2012.
  2. Banks, R. (2010). Techfest2010: Some technology heirlooms. Blog: Rb.log. Accessed 30 Nov 2012.
  3. Bell, G., & Gemmell, J. (2009). Total recall: How the e-memory revolution will change everything. New York: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
  4. Blackman, L. (2008). The body. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  5. Dvorsky, G. (2004). Transhumanism evolves in silence. Blog: Sentient Developments, Science, Futurism, Life. Accessed 30 Nov 2012.
  6. Freud, S. (1913/1984). Mourning and melancholia. Pelican Freud Library (Vol. 11). London: Pelican.Google Scholar
  7. Haraway, D. (1990). A manifesto for cyborgs, science, technology and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Feminism/Postmodernism (Thinking Gender), 17, 190–233.Google Scholar
  8. Hayles, K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kasket, E. (2012). Continuing bonds in the age of social networking: Facebook as a modern-day medium. Bereavement Care, 31(2), 62–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Latour, B. (2004). How to talk about the body? The normative dimensions of science studies. Body and Society, 10(2–3), 205–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leder, D. (1992). The body in medical thought and practice. The Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Malabou, C. (2009). What should we do with our brain? New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Massimi, M., & Baecker, R. (2010). A death in the family: Opportunities for designing technologies for the bereaved. In Proceedings of HCI: At the end of life. Understanding death dying and the digital. Atlanta: Georgia.Google Scholar
  14. Microsoft Research Labs. Microsoft. Technology heirlooms project. Accessed 1 Dec 2012.
  15. Moncur, W., Bikker, J., Kasket, E., & Troyer, J. (2012). From death to final disposition: Roles of technology in the post-mortem interval. In CHI’12 proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 531–540). ACM.Google Scholar
  16. Morgan, E. (1869). The Apollo belvedere. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 3(1), 94–96. Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  18. Odom, W., Harper, R., Sellen, A., Kirk, D., & Banks, R. (2010). Passing on & putting to rest: Understanding, bereavement in the context of interactive technologies (Vol. 18, pp. 31–40). The ACM Press.Google Scholar
  19. ORLAN. orlan. Accessed 30 Nov 2012.
  20. Paniagua, M. (2012). Cyberfeminist theories and the benefits of teaching cyberfeminist literature. In A. Lopez-Varela (Ed.), Social sciences and cultural studies – Issues of language, public opinion education and welfare (pp. 243–264). Published Online under CC by 3.0 license.
  21. Pepperell, R. (1995). The posthuman condition: Consciousness beyond the brain. Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar
  22. Poe, E. (1839). The man that was used up: A tale of the late bugaboo and Kickapoo campaign. Mabbott, T. (1978). The collected works of Edgar Allan Poe: Tales and sketches (Vol. 2, pp. 376–392).
  23. Stelarc. stelarc. Accessed 30 Nov 2012.
  24. Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time. 1: The fault of Epimetheus (trans: Collins G., & Beardsworth, R.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Sweetman, B. (Ed). (1999). The failure of modernism: The Cartesian legacy and contemporary pluralism. Mishawaka: American Maritain Association.Google Scholar
  26. Terasem Movement Foundation (TFM). Terasem movement foundation. Accessed 25 Nov 2012.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Goldsmiths, University of LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of ComputingGoldsmiths, University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations