Living with the Dead: Emergent Post-mortem Digital Curation and Creation Practices

  • Selina Ellis GrayEmail author
  • Paul Coulton
Part of the Human–Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)


This chapter explores the emergent digital dimension of contemporary Western mourning, by utilising a historical framework and a postmodern, post-disciplinary and practice theory lens, in order to critically discuss how the ruptures of loss and the presence of the dead are radically manifesting in the digital age. We begin with a contextual overview of the historical landscape of mourning, its perceived decline and the twentieth century gaze toward private grief, before proceeding to introduce the paradigm of continuing bonds and the social presence of the dead.

From this contextualisation, the chapter then introduces twenty-first century digital mourning through a discussion of the emergent practices which curate and create the spectral presence of the dead online. We argue that mourning has not collapsed, but is radically manifest in ways currently unaccounted for and invisible within the dominant filter of memorialisation. Finally, we introduce a range of potential implications and challenges that will be faced by HCI researchers and designers of systems supporting the ‘End of Life’, by highlighting the emerging socio-cultural complexity in need of consideration when designing technologies for bereavement support.


Social Presence Social Convention Photo Collection Historical Landscape Digital Ecosystem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



 We acknowledge helpful comments on an earlier draft by Rachael Lovie.


  1. Anker, J. (2012). ‘Shooting victim tweeted moments before death’, HLNtv, 20 June. Available:
  2. Archer, J. (2008). Theories of grief: Past, present and future perspectives. In M. Stroebe, H. Schut, & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research and practice: Advances in theory and intervention (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  3. Aries, P. (1981). The hour of our death. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Benoliel, J. Q. (1994). Death and dying as a field of inquiry. In I. B. Corless, B. B. Germino, & M. Pitman (Eds.), Death, dying, bereavement. Boston: Jones and Bartlett.Google Scholar
  5. Bowlby, J. (1961). Process of mourning. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 42, 317–340.Google Scholar
  6. Bowlby, J. (1979). The making and breaking of affectional bonds (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Brubaker, J. R., Hayes, G. R., & Dourish, P. (2012) Beyond the Grave: Facebook as a site for the expansion of death and mourning. The Information Society. Available: 16 Nov 2012.
  8. Carvalho Pereira, V., & Maciel, C. (2012). ‘The Influence of beliefs and death taboos in modelling the fate of digital legacy under the software developers’ view. In CHI12: Workshop paper, Austin, May 2012.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, A. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Crabtree, A., Rouncefield, M., & Tolmie, P. (2012). Doing design ethnography. eBook: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, D. J. (2002). Death, ritual and belief (2nd ed.). London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  12. DeGroot, J. M. (2012). Maintaining relational continuity with the deceased on Facebook. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying, 65(3), 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellis, S. (2012) ‘An interdisciplinary lens: Design challenges in bereavement support’, Memento Mori, workshop: technology design at the end of life, A workshop held in association with ACM SIGCHI 2012, Austin, May.Google Scholar
  14. Ellis Gray, S. (2012). ‘The diversity of mourning practices online’, Digital Futures 2012, Aberdeen.Google Scholar
  15. Ellis-Gray, S. (2013, April 1). Dead smart: Posting from beyond the grave. Experimentation. Available: [07 May 2013].
  16. Garde-Hansen, J., Hoskins, A., & Reading, A. (2009). Introduction. In J. Garde-Hansen, A. Hoskins, & A. Reading (Eds.), Save as: Digital memories. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gibson, M. (2008). Objects of the dead. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gittings, C., & Walter, T. (2010). What will the neighbours say? Reactions to field and garden burial. In J. Hockey, C. Komaromy, & K. Woodthorpe (Eds.), The matter of death: Space, place and materiality. Hampshire/New York: Palgrave Macmillian.Google Scholar
  19. Gorer, G. (1955). The pornography of death. Encounter, October, 49–52.Google Scholar
  20. Gorer, G. (1965). Death, grief and mourning in contemporary Britain. London: Cresset.Google Scholar
  21. Hallam, E., & Hockey, J. (2001). Death, memory and material culture. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  22. Hallam, E., Hockey, J., & Howarth, G. (1999). Beyond the body: Death and social identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Hockey, J. (2001). Changing death rituals. In J. Hockey, J. Katz, & N. Small (Eds.), Grief, mourning and death rituals. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hockey, J., & Small, N. (2001). Discourse into practice: The production of bereavement care. In J. Katz, J. Hockey, & N. Small (Eds.), Grief, mourning and death ritual. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Howarth, G. (2000). Dismantling the boundaries between life and death. Mortality: Promoting the Interdisciplinary Study of Death and Dying, 5(2), 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Katz, J. (2001). Introduction. In J. K. J. S. N. Hockey (Ed.), Grief, mourning and death rituals. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Klass, D., Silverman, P. R., & Nickan, S. L. (1996). Continuing bonds: New understandings of grief. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  28. Kubler-Ross, E. (1969). On death and dying. New York: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  29. Le Goff, J. (1992). History and memory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lofland, L. H. (1985). The social shaping of emotion: The case of grief. Symbolic Interaction, 8(2), 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Luciano, D. (2007). Arranging grief: Sacred time and the body in nineteenth-century America. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lunghi, M. (2006). Ontology and magic: A conceptual exploration of denial following bereavement. Mortality, 11(1), 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maddrell, A., & Sidaway, J. D. (2010). Deathscapes: Spaces for death, dying, mourning and remembrance. Surray: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  34. Massimi, M. (2012). Thanatosensitively designed technologies for bereavement. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  35. Massimi, M., Odom, W., Banks, R., & Kirk, D. (2011). Matters of life and death: Locating the end of life in lifespan-oriented HCI research. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI’ 11), Vancouver.Google Scholar
  36. Rainey, S. (2012). Tragic marathon runner turns Britain into the land of the giving, 25th April, [Online]. Available: 20 Dec 2012.
  37. Rittel, H., & Weber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices – A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  40. Seremetakis, C. N. (1994). The senses still: Perception and memory as material culture in modernity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Small, N. (2001). Theories of grief: A critical review. In J. Hockey, J. Katz, & N. Small (Eds.), Grief, mourning and death rituals. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Sofka, C. J. (1997). Social support “internetworks”, caskets for sale, and more: Thanatology. Death Studies, 21(6), 553–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (2011). The domestication of death: The sequestration thesis. Sociology, 45, 947–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stolterman, E. (2008). The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research. International Journal of Design, 2(1), 55–65.Google Scholar
  45. Stroebe, M. (1992). Coping with bereavement: A review of the grief work hypothesis. Omega: The Journal of Death and Dying, 26, 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stroebe, M. S. H. O., Schut, H., & Stroebe, W. (2008). Bereavement research: Contemporary perspectives. In M. S. H. O. Stroebe, H. Schut, & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research and practice: Advances in theory and Practice (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American psychological association.Google Scholar
  47. Taylor, A. (2011). ‘Girl’s tragic last Facebook update: Feels like death’. In ALASTAIR TAYLOR, 6 October. Available: 21 Dec 2012.
  48. Van Doorn, N. (2011). Digital spaces, material traces: How matter comes to matter in online performances of gender sexuality and embodiment. Media, Culture and Society, 33(4), 531–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Walter, T. (1994). The revival of death. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Walter, T. (1999). On bereavement: The culture of grief. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Walter, T. (2008). The new public mourning. In M. S. Stroebe, R. O. Hansson, H. Schut, & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research and practice: Advances in theory and intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  52. Walter, T., Hourizi, R., Moncur, W., & Pitsillides, S. (2011). Does the internet change how we die and mourn? Overview and analysis. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 64(4), 275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.High WireLancaster UniversityLancasterUK
  2. 2.Imagination LancasterLancaster UniversityLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations