Transcendental Intersubjectivity and Normality: Constitution by Mortals

  • Sara HeinämaaEmail author
Part of the Contributions to Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 71)


For Husserl, the sense of the world is an intersubjective accomplishment. The individual ego does not establish this sense by itself but constitutes it in community and communication with other egos. However, in his manuscripts, Husserl argues that the community that gives the world its full sense only includes normal subjects. This paper clarifies the role of normal subjects in world-constitution. I start by identifying the criteria that Husserl uses in delineating the community of constitutors. This allows us to study the different types of anomalous subjects that are excluded from this community. I focus my discourse on two special cases of anomality: the infant and the animal. I argue that mortality, generativity, and the practice of writing have a crucial role in Husserl’s exclusion of infants and animals from the constitutive activity that gives the world its full sense. Both infants and animals lack the sense of themselves as members of a generation and as members of an open series of generations. This deprivation hinders them from taking part in the activity that provides the world with the sense of a temporally continuous infinity. Thus, Husserl’s arguments about infants and animals differ in an interesting way from the traditional Cartesian arguments still dominate contemporary philosophy of mind and language: infants and animals are not anomalous to us because they would lack thinking, cogito, or self-awareness, but because their understanding of themselves as communal beings is severely limited.


Objective World Full Sense Husserlian Phenomenology Transcendental Subjectivity Primitive Culture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Alanen, L. (2003). Descartes’s concept of mind. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. (2004). History of animals (D’Arcy Wentworth Thompson, Trans.). Kessinger Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Bernet, R. (1996). The unconscious between representation and drive: Freud, Husserl and Schopenhauer. In J. J. Drummond & J. G. Hart (Eds.), Truthful and good: Essays in the honor of Robert Sokolowski (pp. 81–95). Dordrecht/London/Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernet, R. (2006). Zur Phänomenologie von Trieb und Lust bei Husserl. In D. Lohmar & D. Fonfara (Eds.), Interdiziplinäre Perspektiven der Phänomenologie: Neue Felder der Kooperation: Cognitive Science, Neurowissenschaft, Psyhologie, Sosiologie, Politikwissenschaft und Religionswissenschaft (pp. 38–53). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Bernet, R. (2010). Transzendentale Phänomenologie? In C. Ierna, H. Jacobs, & F. Mattens (Eds.), Philosophy, phenomenology, sciences: Essays in commemoration of Edmund Husserl (pp. 41–70). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradford, P. V., & Blume, H. (1992). Ota Benga: The Pygmy in the zoo. New York: St. Martins Press.Google Scholar
  8. Carr, D. (1999). The paradox of subjectivity: The self in the transcendental tradition. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. de Folter, R. J. (1983). Reziprozität der Perspektiven und Normalität bei Husserl und Schütz. In R. Grathoff & B. Waldenfels (Eds.), Sozialität und Intersubjektivität: Phänomenologische Perspektiven der Sozialwissenschaften in Umkreis von Aron Gurwitsch und Alfred Schütz (pp. 157–181). München: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
  10. DeGrood, D. H. (1971). Life-world within brackets. In D. H. DeGrood, D. Riepe, & E. D’Angelo (Eds.), Philosophy at the barricade (pp. 8–15). Bridgeport: Spartagus Books.Google Scholar
  11. Depraz, N. (2001). Pulsion, instinct, désir: Que signifie Trieb chez Husserl. Alter, 9, 113–125.Google Scholar
  12. Derrida, J. ([1962] 1974). Introduction. In Edmund Husserl: Lorigine de la géometrié (J. Derrida, Trans.). Paris: PUF. (In English Edmund Husserls origin of geometry: An introduction by Jacques Derrida, 1989, Lincoln/London: University of Nebraska Press)Google Scholar
  13. Derrida, J. (1967a). De la grammatologie. Paris: Minuit. (In English On grammatology, by G. C. Spivak, Trans., 1976, Baltimore/London: The John Hopkins University Press)Google Scholar
  14. Derrida, J. (1967b). L’ecriture et la différence. Paris: Seuil. (In English Writing and difference, by A. Bass, Trans., 1985, London/Melbourne/Henely: Routledge & Kegan Paul)Google Scholar
  15. Derrida, J. (1967c). La voix et le phénomène. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (In English Speech and phenomena, by D. B. Allison, Trans., 1973, Evanston: Northwestern University Press)Google Scholar
  16. Descartes, R. ([1964–1976] 1996). In C. Adam & P. Tannery (Eds.), AT. Œuvres de Descartes (Rev. ed.). Paris: Vrin/C.N.R.S. (In English The philosophical writings of Descartes, by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch, Trans., 1984–1991, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
  17. Donohoe, J. (2004). Husserl on ethics and intersubjectivity: From static to genetic phenomenology. New York: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
  18. Foucault, M. (1966). Les mots et les choses: Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris: Gallimard. (In English The order of things: An archeology of the human sciences, by A. Sheridan, Trans., 1973, New York: Random House/Vintage Books)Google Scholar
  19. Hadreas, P. (2003). Husserl and the phenomenology of racism. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 34(1), 87–97.Google Scholar
  20. Harrowitz, N. A., & Hyams, B. (Eds.). (1995). Jew and gender: Responses to Otto Weininger. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hart, J. (1992). The person and the common life: Studies in Husserlian social ethics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hartimo, M. (2006). Logic as a universal medium or logic as a calculus? Husserl and the presuppositions of “the ultimate presupposition of twentieth century philosophy”. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 44, 569–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heijenoort, J. V. (1967). Logic as calculus and logic as language. Synthese, 17, 324–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heinämaa, S. (2007). Selfhood, consciousness, and embodiment: A Husserlian approach. In S. Heinämaa, P. Remes, & V. Lähteenmäki (Eds.), Consciousness: From perception to reflection in the history of philosophy (pp. 311–328). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heinämaa, S. (2010a). Embodiment and expressivity in Husserl’s phenomenology: From logical investigations to Cartesian meditations. SATS – Northern European Journal of Philosophy, 11, 1–15.Google Scholar
  26. Heinämaa, S. (2010b). Future and others. In R. M. Schott (Ed.), Birth, death and the feminine: Essays in the philosophy of embodiment (pp. 119–156). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Heinämaa, S. (2013). Husserl’s ethics of renewal: A personalistic approach. In S. Heinämaa, V. Mäkinen, & M. Tuominen (Eds.), New Perspectives to Aristotelianism and Its Critics, Brill (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
  28. Hintikka, J. (1996). Lingua universalis vs. calculus ratiocinator: An ultimate presupposition of twentieth-century philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Hintikka, J., & Hintikka, M. B. (1986). Investigating Wittgenstein. Oxford: Basill Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Husserl, E. Hua3. (1913). In W. Biemel (Ed.), Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. (In English Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology, by W. R. Boyce Gibson, Trans., 1962, New York/London: Collier)Google Scholar
  31. Husserl, E. Hua1. (1950). In S. Strasser (Ed.), Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. (In English Cartesian meditations, by D. Cairns, Trans., 1960, Dordrecht/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff)Google Scholar
  32. Husserl, E. Hua4. (1952). In M. Bimel (Ed.), Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie, Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. (In English Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy, Second book: Studies in the phenomenological constitution, by R. Rojcewicz & A. Schuwer, Trans., 1993, Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers)Google Scholar
  33. Husserl, E. Hua6. (1954). In W. Biemel (Ed.), Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie: Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologischen Philosophie. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. (In English The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy, by D. Carr, Trans., 1988, Evanston: Northwestern University)Google Scholar
  34. Husserl, E. Hua7. (1956). In R. Bernet (Ed.), Erste Philosophie (1923/4). Erste Teil/The Hague: Kritische Ideengeschichte/Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  35. Husserl, E. Hua13. (1973a). In I. Kern (Ed.), Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität, Texte aus dem Nachlass, Erster Teil (1905–1920). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  36. Husserl, E. Hua14. (1973b). In I. Kern (Ed.), Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität, Texte aus dem Nachlass, Zweiter Teil (1921–1928). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  37. Husserl, E. Hua15. (1973c). In I. Kern (Ed.), Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität, Texte aus dem Nachlass, Dritter Teil (1929–1935). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  38. Husserl, E. Hua23. (1980). In E. Marbach (Ed.), Phäntasie, Bildbewusstsein, Erinnerung, Zur Phänomenologie der anschaulichen Vergegenwartigungen, Texte aus dem Nachlass (1898–1925). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  39. Husserl, E. Hua27. (1988). In T. Nenon & H. R. Sepp (Eds.), Aufsätze und Vorträge. 1922–1937. The Hague: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. Husserl, E. Hua29. (1992). In R. N. Smid (Eds.), Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie, Ergänzungsband, Texte aus dem Nachlass 1934–1937. The Hague: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. Husserl, E. Hua39. (2008). In R. Sowa (Ed.), Die Lebenswelt: Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und ihrer Konstitution, Texte aus dem Nachlass (1916–1937). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  42. Kusch, M. (1989). Language as calculus vs. language as universal medium: A study in Husserl, Heidegger and Gadamer. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kusch, M., & Hintikka, J. (1988). Kieli ja maailma. Oulu: Pohjoinen.Google Scholar
  44. Lawlor, L. (2002). Derrida and Husserl: The basic problem of phenomenology. Indiana/Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Lee, N.-I. (1993). Husserls Phänomenologie der Instinkte. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lévinas, E. ([1972] 1987). Meaning and sense. In Collected philosophical papers (A. Linguis, Trans.). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff. (Original: La signification et le sense)Google Scholar
  47. Lähteenmäki, V. (2009). The possibility of animal experience in light of Descartes’ notion of awareness. In V. Lähteenmäki (Ed.), Essays on early modern conceptions of consciousness: Descartes, Gudworth, and Locke. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä Press.Google Scholar
  48. Merleau-Ponty, M. ([1945] 1993). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard [In English Phenomenology of perception, C. Smith, Trans., 1995. London: Routledge].Google Scholar
  49. Miettinen, T. (2013). The idea of Europe in Husserl’s phenomenology: A study in generativity and historicity, philosophical studies from the University of Helsinki 36. Helsinki: Multiprint.Google Scholar
  50. Moran, D. (2011). “Even a Papuan is a man and not a beast”: Husserl on universalism and the relativity of cultures. Journal of History of Philosophy, 49(4), 463–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Osborne, C. (2007). On language, concepts, and automata. In Dumb beasts and dead philosophers: Humanity and the humane in ancient philosophy and literature (pp. 63–97). Oxford: Claredon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rinofner-Kreidl, S. (2003). Mediane Phänomenologie: Subjektivität im Spannungsfeld von Naturalität and Kulturalität. Würzburg: Verlag Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
  53. Rodemeyer, L. (2006). Intersubjective temporality: It’s about time. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  54. Römpp, G. (1992). Husserls Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität und ihre Bedeutung für eine Theorie intersubjektiven Objektivität und die Konzeption einer phänomenologischen Philosophie. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  55. Smith, N. (2010). Towards phenomenology of repressionA Husserlian reply to the Freudian challenge. Acta Universitatis Stockholmsiensis 34. University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
  56. Sokolowski, R. (2000). Phenomenology of the human person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Stein, E. ([1932–1933] 2004). In C. M. Wulf (Ed.), Der Aufbau der menschlichen Person: Vorlesung zur philosophischen Anthropologie. Edith Stein Gesamtausgabe 8. Freiburg: Herder.Google Scholar
  58. Stein, E. (2000). In M. A. Neyer OCD (Ed.), Die Frau. Fragestellungen und Reflexionen. Edith Stein Gesamtausgabe 13. Freiburg/Basel/Wien: Herder. (In English Essays on woman. The collected works of Edith Stein II, second revised edition by F. M. Oben, Trans., 1996, Washington, DC: ICS Publications)Google Scholar
  59. Steinbock, A. (1995). Home and beyond: Generative phenomenology after Husserl. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Stern, D. G., & Szabados, B. (2004). Wittgenstein reads Weininger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Taipale, J. (2014). Phenomenology and embodiment. Husserl and the constitution of subjectivity. Evanston: Northwestern University Press (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  62. Weininger, O. ([1903] 1906). Sex and character. New York: A.L. Burt.Google Scholar
  63. Wittgenstein, L. (1995). In B. McGuinness & G. H. von Wright (Eds.), Cambridge letters. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  64. Zahavi, D. ([1996] 2001). Husserl and transcendental intersubjectivity (E. A. Behnke, Trans.). Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Zahavi, D. (2011). Husserl and the transcendental. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Academy of Finland, Helsinki Collegium for Advanced StudiesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations