Advertisement

Determination of Zone of Flow Instability in a Gas Flow Past a Square Particle in a Narrow Microchannel

  • Kiril Shterev
  • Stefan Stefanov
Part of the Modeling and Optimization in Science and Technologies book series (MOST, volume 2)

Abstract

The rapidly emerging industry of micro-electro-mechanical devices gives rise to new potential microfluidic applications. The analysis of the possible flow regimes is an important task of any microfluidic investigation. For a gas flow the transition between steady and unsteady regimes occurs at small Knudsen number Kn < 0.1 (Kn = ℓ0 / L, where ℓ0 is the mean free path of the gas molecules and L is the characteristic length). A continuum approach based on the Navier-Stokes-Fourier equations is applicable for this investigation. On the other side, the microfluidic application requires the problem to be investigated starting at very low Mach numbers (M = 0.1), close to incompressible regime. This makes pressure based methods very suitable for this investigation. The system of Navier-Stokes-Fourier equations is calculated numerically using pressure based algorithm SIMPLE-TS 2D. The results are validated by comparing them to data obtained by using molecular approach (direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) method).

Keywords

Mach Number Knudsen Number Direct Simulation Monte Carlo Total Variation Diminish Karman Vortex Street 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Colin, S.: Rarefaction and compressibility effects on steady and transient gas flows in microchannels. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 1, 268–279 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nabavi, M.: Steady and unsteady flow analysis in microdiffusers and micropumps: a critical review. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 7, 599–619 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schaaf, S.A., Chambre, P.L.: Flow of Rarefied Gases. Princeton University Press, USA (1961)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    el Hak, M.G.: The fluid mechanics of microdevices: The freeman scholar lecture. ASME J. Fluid Eng. 121, 5–33 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cercignani, C.: Rarefied Gas Dynamics. From Basic Concept to Actual Calculations. University Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sone, Y.: Molecular Gas Dynamics: Theory, Techniques, and Applications. Birkhäser, Boston (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bird, G.A.: Molecular, Gas Dynamics and the Direct Simulation of Gas Flows. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1994)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stefanov, S., Roussinov, V., Cercignani, C.: Rayleigh-Bénard flow of a rarefied gas and its attractors. I. Convection regime. Physics of Fluids 14(7), 2255–2269 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sohankar, A., Davidson, L., Norbeg, C.: Numerical Simulation of Unsteady Flow Around a Square Two-Dimensional Cylinder, pp. 517–520 (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shterev, K.S., Stefanov, S.K.: Pressure based finite volume method for calculation of compressible viscous gas flows. Journal of Computational Physics 229(2), 461–480 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shterev, K.S., Stefanov, S.K.: A parallelization of finite volume method for calculation of gas microflows by domain decomposition methods. In: Lirkov, I., Margenov, S., Waśniewski, J. (eds.) LSSC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5910, pp. 523–530. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shterev, K.S., Stefanov, S.K., Atanassov, E.I.: A parallel algorithm with improved performance of finite volume method (simple-ts). In: Lirkov, I., Margenov, S., Waśniewski, J. (eds.) LSSC 2011. LNCS, vol. 7116, pp. 351–358. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roe, P.L.: Some contributions to the modelling of discontinuous flows. Lectures in Applied Mathematics 22, 163–193 (1985)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shterev, K.S., Ivanovska, S.: Comparison of some approximation schemes for convective terms for solving gas flow past a square in a microchannel. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1487(1), pp. 79–87 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Balaž, A., Prnjat, O., Vudragović, D., Slavnić, V., Liabotis, I., Atanassov, E., Jakimovski, B., Savić, M.: Development of Grid e-Infrastructure in South-Eastern Europe. Journal of Grid Computing 9(2), 135–154 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stefanov, S., Roussinov, V., Cercignani, C.: Rayleigh-Bénard flow of a rarefied gas and its attractors. II. Chaotic and periodic convective regimes. Physics of Fluids 14(7), 2270–2288 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stefanov, S., Roussinov, V., Cercignani, C.: Rayleigh-Bénard flow of a rarefied gas and its attractors. III. Three-dimensional computer simulations. Physics of Fluids 19(12), 124101 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    GadelHak, M.: MEMS: Introduction and Fundamentals. CRC Press (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of MechanicsBulgarian Academy of SciencesSofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations