Advertisement

Artistic Practice, Methodology, and Subjectivity: The “I Can” as Practical Possibility and Original Consciousness

  • Andreas Georg StascheitEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 69)

Abstract

The verb “to practice” is commonly used in performing arts, particularly in music, to designate the heuristic method aiming at the intended development of new potentialities of performance and the incorporation of new ways and means into one’s repertoire of animate-bodily expression.

The paper sketches an analysis of practicing in the sense of the specific “mode of the ‘I do’” (Edmund Husserl) that provides access to intentionally extending, modifying, or restructuring the “horizon of ability.” Six structural aspects are distinguished: reiteration, variation, dialogue, transformation, simultaneity, and the self-referentiality of practicing as practice of permanent beginning.

Keywords

Phenomenological Analysis Thematic Focus Continuous Open Task Practical Possibility Slow Tempo 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bernet, R., I. Kern, and E. Marbach. 1993. An Introduction to Husserlian phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Gadamer, H.-G. 1979. Truth and method. Second English edition. London: Sheed and Ward.Google Scholar
  3. Husserl, E. 1970. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Trans. D. Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Husserl, E. 1989. Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. Second book. Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. Trans. R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  5. Landgrebe, L. 1963. Von der Unmittelbarkeit der Erfahrung [On the immediacy of experience]. In Der Weg der Phänomenologie: das Problem einer ursprünglichen Erfahrung, ed. L. Landgrebe, 125–141. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus Mohn.Google Scholar
  6. Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of perception. Trans. C. Smith. New York/London: Humanities Press/Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  7. Merleau-Ponty, M. 2001. Two unpublished notes on music. Trans. L. Lawlor, cf.: http://www.pdcnet.org/chiasmi/Special-Issues 3, 18. Chiasmi International. Trilingual Studies Concerning the Thought of Merleau-Ponty.
  8. Rojcewicz, R., and A. Schuwer. 1989. Translators’ introduction. In Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy, Second book. Studies in the phenomenology of constitution, ed. E. Husserl, XI–XVI. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  9. Schutz, A. 1966. Edmund Husserl’s Ideas, Volume II. In Collected papers III. Studies in phenomenological philosophy, ed. A. Schutz, 15–39. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  10. Stascheit, A.G. 2003. Doppelgriffe: Phänomenologische Motive vom Gesichtspunkt der Musikarbeit [Double stoppings: phenomenological themes from the point of view of the musician at work]. In Phänomenologie und soziale Wirklichkeit: Entwicklungen und Arbeitsweisen, ed. I. Srubar and S. Vaitkus, 215–238. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.Google Scholar
  11. Waldenfels, B. 2007. The question of the other. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Advanced Study in the HumanitiesEssenGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Music and MusicologyDortmund UniversityDortmundGermany
  3. 3.Department of Social SciencesDortmund University of Applied Sciences and ArtsDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations