Advertisement

Moral Intelligence – A Framework for Understanding Moral Competences

  • Carmen TannerEmail author
  • Markus Christen
Chapter
Part of the Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy book series (LOET, volume 32)

Abstract

In light of several corporate ethical scandals and the financial crisis many people are asking what can be done to promote moral behavior and to prevent similar transgressions in the future. In this chapter, we argue that beyond cultural and contextual influences, changes do also require agents who are skilled in how to deal with moral issues and how to turn moral standards into actions. In order to specify the abilities that facilitate moral functioning, the present work is designed to put forth a theoretical framework of “Moral Intelligence” which integrates current literature and research on moral decision-making, social cognition and self-regulation theory. The framework’s elementary concepts (which are: the moral compass, moral commitment, moral sensitivity, moral problem solving and moral resoluteness) and the underlying mechanisms are detailed. At the end, the practical value of the advocated model and the question of how to enhance moral intelligence is also briefly discussed.

Keywords

Moral Judgment Moral Identity Moral Behavior Moral Standard Moral Motivation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Appiah, K.A. 2010. The honor code: How moral revolutions happen. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  2. Aquino, K., and A. Reed II. 2002. The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83(6): 1423–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aquino, K., A. Reed 2nd, S. Thau, and D. Freeman. 2007. A grotesque and dark beauty: How the self-importance of moral identity and mechanisms of moral disengagement influence cognitive and emotional reactions to war. Journal of Experimental Psychology 43: 385–392.Google Scholar
  4. Atran, S., R. Axelrod, and R. Davis. 2007. Sacred barriers to conflict resolution. Science 317: 1039–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. 1965. Influence of models’ reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1: 589–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. 1991. Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In Handbook of moral behavior and development, vol. 1, ed. K.W. Murtines and J.L. Gewirtz, 45–103. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Bandura, A., G.V. Caprara, C. Barbaranelli, C. Pastorelli, and C. Regalia. 2001. Sociocognitive self regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80(1): 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bargh, J.A. 1997. The automaticity of everyday life. In The automaticity of everyday life: Advances in social cognition, vol. 10, ed. R.S. Wyer Jr., 1–61. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Baron, J., and M. Spranca. 1997. Protected values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 70: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baumeister, R.F. 1998. The self. In Handbook of social psychology, 4th ed, ed. D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, and G. Lindzey, 680–740. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  11. Baumeister, R.F., and J.J. Exline. 1999. Virtue, personality, and social relations: Self-control as the moral muscle. Journal of Personality 67: 1165–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baumeister, R.F., M. Gailliot, C.N. DeWall, and M. Oaten. 2006. Self-regulation and personality: How interventions increase regulatory success, and how depletion moderates the effects of traits on behavior. Journal of Personality 74: 1773–1801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blasi, A. 1980. Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin 8: 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blasi, A. 1983. Moral cognition and moral action: A theoretical perspective. Developmental Review 3: 178–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blasi, A. 2005. Moral character: A psychological approach. In Character psychology and character education, ed. D.K. Lapsley and F.C. Power, 67–100. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  16. Brink, D. 1997. Moral motivation. Ethics 108: 4–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cacioppo, J.T., R.E. Petty, J.A. Feinstein, and W. Jarvis. 1996. Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin 119(2): 197–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carver, C.S., and M.E. Scheier. 1981. Attention and self-regulation: A control theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carver, C.S., and M.E. Scheier. 1990. Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review 97: 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chaiken, S. 1980. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology 39: 752–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chaiken, S., and Y. Trope. 1999. Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  22. Chambers, D.W. 2011. Developing a self-scoring comprehensive instrument to measure Rest’s four-component model of moral behavior: The moral skills inventory. Journal of Dental Education 75(1): 23–35.Google Scholar
  23. Clarkeburn, H. 2002. A test for ethical sensitivity in science. Journal of Moral Education 31(4): 439–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Colby, A., and W. Damon. 1992. Some do care: Contemporary lives of moral commitment. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  25. Damasio, A.R. 1994. Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  26. Dane, E., and M.G. Pratt. 2007. Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review 32(1): 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dijksterhuis, A., M.W. Bos, L.F. Nordgren, and R.B. von Baaren. 2006. On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science 311: 1005–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Epstein, S. 1991. Cognitive-experiential self-theory: An integrative theory of personality. In The self with others: Convergences in psychoanalytical, social, and personality psychology, ed. R. Curtis, 111–137. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  29. Fazio, R.H. 1990. Multiple processes by which attitude guide behavior: The mode model as an integrative framework. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 23: 75–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fine, S. 2010. Cross-cultural integrity testing as a marker of regional corruption rates. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 18: 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fiske, S.T., and S.E. Taylor. 1991. Social cognition, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  32. Fitzsimons, G.M., and J.A. Bargh. 2004. Automatic self-regulation. In Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications, ed. R.F. Baumeister and K.D. Vohs, 151–170. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  33. Forgas, J.P. 1995. Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin 117(1): 39–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Frank, R.H. 1988. Passion within reason: The strategic role of the emotions. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  35. Gibson, R., C. Tanner, and A. Wagner. 2013. Preferences for truthfulness: Heterogenity among and within individuals. American Economic Review 103: 532–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gigerenzer, G. 2010. Moral satisficing: Rethinking moral behavior as bounded rationality. Topics in Cognitive Science 2: 528–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gigerenzer, G., P.M. Todd, and The ABC Research Group. 1999. Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Gino, F., M.E. Schweitzer, N.L. Mead, and D. Ariely. 2011. Unable to resist temptation: How self-control depletion promotes unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 115(2): 191–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Greene, J.D., and J.M. Paxton. 2009. Patterns of neural activity associated with honest and dishonest moral decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106(30): 12506–12511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Haidt, J. 2001. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 108: 814–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hanselmann, M., and C. Tanner. 2008. Taboos and conflicts in decision making: Sacred values, decision difficulty, and emotions. Judgment and Decision Making 3: 51–63.Google Scholar
  42. Hardy, S.A., and G. Carlo. 2005. Identity as a source of moral motivation. Human Development 48: 232–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Higgins, E.T. 1996. Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, ed. E.T. Higgins and A.W. Kruglanski, 133–168. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  44. Hoffman, M. 2000. Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hogarth, R.M. 2001. Educating intuition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  46. Janis, I.L., and L. Mann. 1977. Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  47. Jones, T.M. 1991. Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review 16: 366–395.Google Scholar
  48. Jordan, J. 2009. A social cognition framework for examining moral awareness in managers and academics. Journal of Business Ethics 84: 237–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kahneman, D. 2003. A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist 58: 697–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Keeney, R.L. 1992. Value-focused thinking: A path to creative decision making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Klein, G.A. 2008. Naturalistic decision making. Human Factors 50(3): 456–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Klein, G.A., S. Wolf, L. Militello, and C. Zsambok. 1995. Characteristics of skilled option generation in chess. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 62(1): 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kohlberg, L. 1969. Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In Handbook of socialization theory and research, ed. D.A. Goslin, 347–480. Chicago: Ran McNally.Google Scholar
  54. Lapsley, D.K., and P. Hill. 2008. On dual processing and heuristic approaches to moral cognition. Journal of Moral Education 37(3): 313–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lapsley, D.K., and D. Narvaez. 2004. A social-cognitive approach to the moral personality. In Moral development, self and identity, ed. D.K. Lapsley and D. Narvaez, 189–212. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  56. Lapsley, D.K., and D. Narvaez. 2005. The psychological foundations of everyday morality and moral expertise. In Character psychology and character education, ed. D.K. Lapsley and F.C. Power, 140–165. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  57. Lecky, W.E.H. 1869/2002. History of European morals from Augustus to Charlemagne. Honolulu: University Press of the Pacific.Google Scholar
  58. Lennick, D., and F. Kiel. 2005. Moral intelligence: Enhancing business performance and leadership success. Upper Saddle River: Wharton Business Press.Google Scholar
  59. Lerner, J., and P.E. Tetlock. 1999. Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin 125: 255–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Loewenstein, G., and J.S. Lerner. 2003. The role of affect in decision making. In Handbook of affective sciences, ed. R.J. Davidson, K.R. Scherer, and H.H. Goldsmith, 619–642. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Luce, M.F., J.R. Bettman, and J.W. Payne. 1997. Choice processing in emotionally difficult decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23: 384–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mead, N.L., R.F. Baumeister, F. Gino, M.E. Schweitzer, and D. Ariely. 2009. Too tired to tell the truth: Self-control resource depletion and dishonesty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45: 594–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Milgram, S. 1963. Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67(4): 371–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Monin, B., D.A. Pizarro, and J.S. Beer. 2007. Deciding versus reacting: Conceptions of moral judgment and the reason-affect debate. Review of General Psychology 11: 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Narvaez, D. 2005. The neo-Kohlbergian tradition and beyond: Schemas, expertise and character. In Nebraska symposium on motivation, Vol. 51. Moral motivation through the lifespan, ed. G. Carlo and C. Pope-Edwards, 119–163. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  66. Narvaez, D. 2010a. Moral complexity: The fatal attraction of truthiness and the importance of mature moral functioning. Perspectives on Psychological Science 5(2): 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Narvaez, D. 2010b. The emotional foundations of high moral intelligence. In Children’s moral emotions and moral cognition: Developmental and educational perspectives, New directions for child and adolescent development 129, ed. B. Latzko and T. Malti, 77–94. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  68. Narvaez, D., D. Lapsley, S. Hagele, and B. Lasky. 2006. Moral chronicity and social information processing: Tests of a social cognitive approach to the moral personality. Journal of Research in Personality 40: 966–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Nichols, S. 2004. Sentimental rules: On the natural foundations of moral judgment. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pedersen, L.J.T. 2009. See no evil: Moral sensitivity in the formulation of business problems. Business Ethics: A European Review 18: 335–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Petty, R.E., and J.T. Cacioppo. 1986. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 19, ed. L. Berkowitz, 123–205. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  72. Piaget, J. 1932/1965/1997. The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press (earlier issues: New York/London: Simon & Schuster/Kegan, Paul).Google Scholar
  73. Plessner, H., and S. Czenna. 2008. The benefits of intuition. In Intuition in judgment and decision making, ed. H. Plessner, C. Betsch, and T. Betsch, 251–266. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  74. Prinz, J.J. 2007b. The emotional construction of morals. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Rest, J.R. 1986. Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  76. Reynolds, S.J. 2006. A neurocognitive model of the ethical decision-making process: Implications for study and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology 91(4): 737–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Reynolds, S.J. 2008. Moral attentiveness: Who pays attention to the moral aspects of life? Journal of Applied Psychology 93(5): 1027–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schlenker, B.R. 2008. Integrity and character: Implications of principled and expedient ethical ideologies. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 27(10): 1078–1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schwarz, N., and G.L. Clore. 1983. Mood, misattribution and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45: 513–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sekerka, L.E., and R.P. Bagozzi. 2007. Moral courage in the workplace: Moving to and from the desire and decision to act. Business Ethics: A European Review 16(2): 132–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Simon, H.A. 1955. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69: 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Simpson, E. 1999. Between internalism and externalism in ethics. The Philosophical Quarterly 49(195): 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Singer, P. 1981. The expanding circle: Ethics and sociobiology. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
  84. Skitka, L.J., C.W. Bauman, and E.G. Sargis. 2005. Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88: 895–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sloman, S.A. 2002. Two systems of reasoning. In Heuristics and biases, ed. T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, and D. Kahneman, 379–396. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Slovic, P., M. Finucane, E. Peters, and D.G. MacGregor. 2002. The affect heuristic. In Heuristics and biases, ed. T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, and D. Kahneman, 397–420. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Smith, E.R., and J. DeCoster. 2000. Dual process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review 4: 108–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sparks, J.R., and S.D. Hunt. 1998. Marketing researcher ethical sensitivity: Conceptualization, measurement, and exploratory investigation. The Journal of Marketing 62(2): 92–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tangney, J.P., J. Stuewig, and D.J. Mashek. 2007. Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology 58: 345–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tanner, C. 2008. Zur Rolle von Geschützten Werten bei Entscheidungen. In Sozialpsychologie und Werte. Beiträge des 23. Hamburger Symposiums zur Methodologie der Sozialpsychologie, Hrsg. E.H. Witte, 172–188. Lengerich: Pabst.Google Scholar
  91. Tanner, C. 2009. To act or not to act: Nonconsequentialism in environmental decision making. Ethics and Behavior 19: 479–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Tanner, C., and D.L. Medin. 2004. Protected values: No omission bias and no framing effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11: 185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Tanner, C., D.L. Medin, and R. Iliev. 2008. Influence of deontological vs. consequentialist orientations on act choices and framing effects: When principles are more important than consequences. European Journal of Social Psychology 38: 757–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tanner, C., B. Ryf, and M. Hanselmann. 2009. Geschützte Werte Skala (GWS): Konstruktion und Validierung eines Messinstrumentes [Sacred Value Measure: Construction and validation of an instrument to assess sacred values]. Diagnostica 55: 174–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tanner, C., A. Brügger, S. van Schie, and C. Lebherz. 2010. Actions speak louder than words. The benefits of ethical behaviors of leaders. Journal of Psychology 218(4): 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Tetlock, P.E., O.V. Kristel, S.B. Elson, M. Green, and J.S. Lerner. 2000. The psychology of the unthinkable. Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 5: 853–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Thagard, P. 2000. Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.Google Scholar
  98. Treviño, L.K., and M.E. Brown. 2004. Managing to be ethical: Debunking five business ethics myths. Academy of Management Executive 18(2): 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Treviño, L.K., K. Butterfield, and D. McCabe. 1998. The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly 8(3): 447–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Van Luijk, H.E.M., and W. Dubbink. 2011. Moral competence. In European business ethics cases in context, Issues in business ethics, vol. 28, ed. W.D. van Liederkerke and H. van Luijk, 11–17. Dordrecht/New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Victor, B., and J.B. Cullen. 1988. The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly 33: 101–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wheatley, T., and J. Haidt. 2005. Hypnotically induced disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science 16: 780–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Banking and Finance, Center for Responsibility in FinanceUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Institute of Biomedical EthicsUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations