Advertisement

Characteristics of Magnetic Fabrics in Mass Transport Deposits in the Nankai Trough Trench Slope, Japan

  • Yujin Kitamura
  • Michael Strasser
  • Beth Novak
  • Toshiya Kanamatsu
  • Kiichiro Kawamura
  • Xixi Zhao
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research book series (NTHR, volume 37)

Abstract

Submarine landslides are a potential risk to coastal areas all over the world. Studies of mass transport deposit (MTD) contribute to our understanding of the nature and process of submarine landslides. Scientific drilling provides material containing geological records of past landslide events. However, MTDs may not always be uniquely discernible by visual inspection. We applied magnetic fabric analysis to the drilled cores to examine the potential of magnetic fabrics for use in identifying MTDs. Among the sites drilled in the framework of the Nankai Trough Seismogenic Zone Experiment (NanTroSEIZE), in Japan, of the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program (IODP), multiple occurrences of MTDs were observed in the recovered cores. We focused on the slope sediments in the footwall of the megasplay fault at Sites C0008 and C0018. The shape parameter (T) and the orientation of the axes of magnetic ellipsoids are distinctively scattered in MTDs at Site C0018. Downward increments in the lineation parameter (L) near the bottom of the MTDs may result from shear localization near the basal sliding plane. This, in combination with visual observation, suggests cohesive mass flow. By contrast, the results from sediments previously described as mass transport complexes at Site C0008 showed the opposite trend, suggesting a different process during transportation; i.e. the mass transport body evolved to become a complete debris flow. Our results show that magnetic fabric analysis is potent for describing MTDs and their internal structures. This finding may extend the methodology for describing MTDs and add to the discussion of the dynamic formation process.

Keywords

Submarine landslide D/V Chikyu NanTroSEIZE Accretionary prism Megasplay fault IODP Expeditions 316 and 333 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research used samples and data provided by the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program. This work was partially supported by KAKENHI 19GS0211 and 21107001. We thank K. Tsuchida (Marine Works Japan Co. Ltd.) for providing technical support with regard to the AMS measurements. The IODP Expeditions 316 and 333 could not have been completed without the devoted contributions of those involved. Careful review and critical comments by David Völker and Yoshitaka Hashimoto improved this manuscript.

References

  1. Ando M (1975) Source mechanisms and tectonic significance of historical earthquakes along Nankai Trough, Japan. Tectonophysics 27:119–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Expedition 316 Scientists (2009) Expedition 316 site C0008. In: Kinoshita M, Tobin H, Ashi J, Kimura G, Lallemant S, Screaton EJ, Curewitz D, Masago H, Moe KT (eds) Expedition 314/315/316 scientists, Proceedings of the integrated ocean drilling program, vol 314/315/316. Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Management International, Inc., Washington, DC. doi: 10.2204/iodp.proc.314315316.136.2009
  3. Expedition 333 Scientists (2012) Site C0018. In: Henry P, Kanamatsu T, Moe K (eds) Expedition 333 scientists, Proceedings of the integrated ocean drilling program, vol 333. Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Management International, Inc., Tokyo. doi: 10.2204/iodp.proc.333.103.2012
  4. Jelinek V (1981) Characterization of the magnetic fabric of rocks. Tectonophysics 79:63–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kanamatsu T, Herroro-Bervera E, Taira A, Saito S, Ashi J, Furumoto AS (1996) Magnetic fabric development in the tertiary accretionary complex in the Boso and Miura Peninsulas of central Japan. Geophys Res Lett 23:471–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kanamatsu T, Pares J, Kitamura Y (2012) Pliocene shortening direction in Nankai Trough off Kumano southwest Japan, Sites IODP C0001 and C0002, Expedition 315; anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility analysis for paleostress. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 13:Q0AD22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kinoshita M, Tobin H, Ashi J, Kimura G, Lallemant S, Screaton EJ, Curewitz D, Masago H, Moe KT, Expedition 314/315/316 Scientists (2009) NanTroSEIZE stage 1: investigations of seismogenesis, Nankai Trough, Japan. In: Proceedings of the integrated ocean drilling program, vol 314/315/316. Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Management International, Inc., Washington, DC. doi: 10.2204/iodp.proc.314315316.2009
  8. Kitamura Y, Kimura G (2012) Dynamic role of tectonic mélange during interseismic process of plate boundary mega earthquakes. Tectonophysics 568–569:39–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kitamura Y, Yamamoto Y (2012) Records of submarine landslides in subduction input recovered by IODP Expedition 322, Nankai Trough, Japan. In: Yamada Y et al (eds) Submarine mass movements and their consequences. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 659–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kitamura Y, Sato K, Ikesawa E, Ikehara-Ohmori K, Kimura G, Kondo H, Ujiie K, Onishi CT, Kawabata K, Hashimoto Y, Mukoyoshi H, Masago H (2005) Melange and its seismogenic roof decollement: a plate boundary fault rock in the subduction zone – an example from the Shimanto Belt, Japan. Tectonics 24:TC5012. doi: 5010.1029/2004TC001635 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kitamura Y, Kanamatsu T, Zhao X (2010) Structural evolution in accretionary prism toe revealed by magnetic fabric analysis from IODP NanTroSEIZE Expedition 316. Earth Planet Sci Lett 292:221–230. doi: 210.1016/j.epsl.2010.1001.1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Masson DG, Harbitz CB, Wynn RB, Pedersen G, Løvholt F (2006) Submarine landslides: processes, triggers and hazard prediction. Philos Trans R Soc A 364:2009–2039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moore G, Kanagawa K, Strasser M, Dugan B, Maeda L, Toczko S, The Expedition 338 Scientists (2013) NanTroSEIZE Stage 3: NanTroSEIZE plate boundary deep riser 2. IODP preliminary report, 338. doi: 10.2204/iodp.pr.338.2013
  14. Ogata K, Mutti E, Pini GA, Tinterri R (2012) Mass transport-related stratal disruption within sedimentary mélanges: examples from the northern Apennines (Italy) and south-central Pyrenees (Spain). Tectonophysics 568–569:185–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Owens WH (1993) Magnetic fabric studies of samples from Hole 808C, Nankai Trough. In: Hill IA, Taira A, Firth JV, et al (eds) Proceedings of the ODP scientific results, College Station, TX (Ocean Drilling Program), pp 301–310Google Scholar
  16. Seno T, Stein S, Gripp A (1993) A model for the motion of the Philippine Sea plate consistent with NUVEL-1 and geological data. J Geophys Res 98(B10):17941–17948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Strasser M, Moore G, Kimura G, Kopf A, Underwood M, Guo J, Screaton E (2011) Slumping and mass-transport deposition in the Nankai forearc: evidence from IODP drilling and 3-D reflection seismic data. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 12:Q0AD13. doi: 10.1029/2010GC003431 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Strasser M, Henry P, Kanamatsu T, Moe KT, Moore GF, IODP_Expedition_333_Scientists (2012) Scientific drilling of mass transport deposits in the Nankai accretionary wedge: first results from IODP Expedition 333. In: Yamada Y et al (eds) Submarine mass movements and their consequences. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 671–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yamamoto Y (2006) Systematic variation of shear-induced physical properties and fabrics in the Miura-Boso accretionary prism: the earliest processes during off-scraping. Earth Planet Sci Lett 244:270–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yujin Kitamura
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michael Strasser
    • 3
  • Beth Novak
    • 4
  • Toshiya Kanamatsu
    • 2
  • Kiichiro Kawamura
    • 5
  • Xixi Zhao
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Earth and Planetary ScienceUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Institute for Research on Earth EvolutionJapan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and TechnologyYokosukaJapan
  3. 3.Geological InstituteETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  4. 4.Department of GeologyWestern Washington UniversityBellinghamUSA
  5. 5.Department of Geosphere SciencesYamaguchi UniversityYamaguchiJapan
  6. 6.Department of Earth and Planetary SciencesUniversity of California Santa CruzSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations