Repeatability Measurements for 2D Interest Point Detectors on 3D Models

  • Simon R. Lang
  • Martin H. Luerssen
  • David M. W. Powers
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 226)

Abstract

Interest point detectors typically operate on 2D images, yet these frequently constitute projections of real 3D scenes [8]. Analysing and comparing the performance of these detectors as to their utility at tracking points in a 3D space is challenging. This paper demonstrates a virtual 3D environment which can measure the repeatability of detected interest points accurately and rapidly. Real-time 3D transform tools enable easy implementation of complex scene evaluations without the time-cost of a manual setup or mark-up. Nine detectors are tested and compared using evaluation and testing methods based on Schmid [16]. Each detector is tested on 34 textured and untextured models that are either scanned from physical objects or modelled by an artist. Rotation in the X, Y, and Z axis as well as scale transformations are tested on each model, with varying degrees of artificial noise applied. Results demonstrate the performance variability of different interest point detectors under different transformations and may assist researchers in deciding on the correct detector for their computer vision application.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beaudet, P.: Rotationally invariant image operators. In: Proc. Intl. Joint Conf. on Pattern Recognition, pp. 579–583 (1978)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carlo Tomasi, T.K.: Detection and tracking of point features. In: Carnegie Mellon University Tech. Rpt (1991)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Förstner, W.: A feature based correspondence algorithms for image matching. Intl. Arch. Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 24, 160–166 (1986)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gauglitz, S., Hllerer, T., Turk, M.: Evaluation of interest point detectors and feature descriptors for visual tracking. Int. Journal of Comp. Vis. 94, 335–360 (2011)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gil, A., Mozos, O., Ballesta, M., Reinoso, O.: A comparative evaluation of interest point detectors and local descriptors for visual slam. Machine Vision and Applications 21, 905–920 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guillaume Gals, S.C., Crouzil, A.: Complementarity of feature point detectors. Intl. Joint Conf. on Comp. Vis. Theory and App. (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harris, C., Stephens, M.: A combined corner and edge detector (1988)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hartley, R., Zisserman, A.: Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision. Cambridge University Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bay, H., Tuytelaars, T., Van Gool, L.: SURF: Speeded up robust features. In: Leonardis, A., Bischof, H., Pinz, A. (eds.) ECCV 2006, Part I. LNCS, vol. 3951, pp. 404–417. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Köthe, U.: Generische programmierung für die bildverarbeitung. PhD Thesis, Universität Hamburg (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lowe, D.G.: Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Intl. Journal of Comp. Vis. 60, 91–110 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Olague, G., Trujillo, L.: Evolutionary computer assisted design of image operators that detect interest points using genetic programming. Image and Vision Computing 29, 484–498 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rohr, K.: Modelling and identification of characteristic intensity variations. Image and Vis. Comp. 10, 66–76 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rosten, E., Drummond, T.: Fusing points and lines for high performance tracking. In: IEEE Intl. Conf. on Comp. Vis., vol. 2, pp. 1508–1511 (October 2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosten, E., Drummond, T.: Machine learning for high-speed corner detection. In: European Conf. on Comp. Vis., vol. 1, pp. 430–443 (May 2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schmid, C., Mohr, R., Bauckhage, C.: Evaluation of interest point detectors. Intl. Journal of Comp. Vis. 37, 151–172 (2000)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon R. Lang
    • 1
  • Martin H. Luerssen
    • 1
  • David M. W. Powers
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computer Science, Engineering and MathematicsFlinders UniversityAdelaideSouth Australia

Personalised recommendations