Advertisement

Model of Syntactic Recognition of Distorted String Patterns with the Help of GDPLL(k)-Based Automata

  • Janusz Jurek
  • Tomasz Peszek
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 226)

Abstract

The process of syntactic pattern recognition consists of two main phases. In the first one the symbolic representation of a pattern is created (so called primitives are identified). In the second phase the representation is analyzed by a formal automaton on the base of a previously defined formal grammar (i.e. syntax analysis / parsing is performed). One of the main problems of syntactic pattern recognition is the analysis of distorted (fuzzy) patterns. If a pattern is distorted and the results of the first phase are wrong, then the second phase usually will not bring satisfactory results either. In this paper we present a model that could allow to solve the problem by involving an uncertainty factor (fuzziness/distortion) into the whole process of syntactic pattern recognition. The model is a hybrid one (based on artificial neural networks and GDPLL(k)-based automata) and it covers both phases of the recognition process (primitives’ identification and syntax analysis). We discuss the application area of this model, as well as the goals of further research.

Keywords

Probabilistic Neural Network Uncertainty Factor Load Forecast Formal Grammar Input Tape 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alfares, H.K., Nazeeruddin, M.: Electric load forecasting: literature survey and classifcation of methods. International Journal of Systems Science 33, 23–34 (2002)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bunke, H.O., Sanfeliu, A. (eds.): Syntactic and Structural Pattern Recognition — Theory and Applications. World Scientific, Singapore (1990)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Emary, I.M., Ramakrishnan, S.: On the Application of Various Probabilistic Neural Networks in Solving Different Pattern Classification Problems. World Applied Sciences Journal 4, 772–780 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Flasiński, M., Jurek, J.: Dynamically Programmed Automata for Quasi Context Sensitive Languages as a Tool for Inference Support in Pattern Recognition-Based Real-Time Control Expert Systems. Pattern Recognition 32, 671–690 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Flasiński, M., Jurek, J.: On the analysis of fuzzy string patterns with the help of extended and stochastic GDPLL(k) grammars. Fundamenta Informaticae 71, 1–14 (2006)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flasiński, M., Jurek, J.: Syntactic Pattern Recognition: Survey of Frontiers and Crucial Methodological Issues. In: Burduk, R., Kurzyński, M., Woźniak, M., Żołnierek, A. (eds.) Computer Recognition Systems 4. AISC, vol. 95, pp. 187–196. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fu, K.S.: Syntactic Pattern Recognition and Applications. Prentice Hall (1982)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goodman, R.M., Higgins, C.M., Miller, J.W.: Rule-Based Neural Networks for Classification and Probability Estimation. Neural Computation 4, 781–804 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jurek, J.: Recent developments of the syntactic pattern recognition model based on quasi-context sensitive languages. Pattern Recognition Letters 26, 1011–1018 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jurek, J.: Grammatical Inference as a Tool for Constructing Self-learning Syntactic Pattern Recognition-Based Agents. In: Bubak, M., van Albada, G.D., Dongarra, J., Sloot, P.M.A. (eds.) ICCS 2008, Part III. LNCS, vol. 5103, pp. 712–721. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jurek, J., Peszek, T.: On the use of syntactic pattern recognition methods, neural networks, and fuzzy systems for short-term electrical load forecasting. Advances in Soft Computing, pp. 851–858. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ogiela, M.R., Ogiela, U.: DNA-like linguistic secret sharing for strategic information systems. International Journal of Information Management 32, 175–181 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pavlidis, T.: Structural Pattern Recognition. Springer (1977)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peszek, T.: Neuro–Fuzzy Prediction Systems in Energetics. Schedae Informaticae 15, 73–94 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pietka, E.: Feature extraction in computerized approach to the ecg analysis. Pattern Recognition 24, 139–146 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Specht, D.F.: Probabilistic Neural Networks. Neural Networks 3, 109–118 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tadeusiewicz, R.: Sieci neuronowe. Akademicka Oficyna Wydawnicza, Warszawa (1993)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tadeusiewicz, R., Flasiński, M.: Rozpoznawanie Obrazów. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa (1991)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tadeusiewicz, R., Ogiela, M.R.: Medical Image Understanding Technology. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Taylor, J., McSharry, P.: Short-Term Load Forecasting Methods: An Evaluation Based on European Data. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 22, 2213–2219 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janusz Jurek
    • 1
  • Tomasz Peszek
    • 1
  1. 1.Information Technology Systems DepartmentJagiellonian UniversityCracowPoland

Personalised recommendations