Subprime Lending and Financial Inequality in an Agent-Based Model

  • Andrea Teglio
  • Silvano Cincotti
  • Einar Jon Erlingsson
  • Marco Raberto
  • Hlynur Stefansson
  • Jon Thor Sturluson
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems book series (LNE, volume 669)

Abstract

Real estate bubbles often trigger financial and economic crisis. U.S. subprime mortgage crisis and the Spanish property bubble, both occurring in 2008, are recent examples whose consequences are still affecting the respective economies. The aim of this paper is to understand if the level of concentration of financial capital has an impact on the real estate bubble formation. We study the issue in a first scenario where mortgage loans are easily granted (subprime mortgages) and in second one with a stricter regulation for the access to credit. Our results show that the combination of capital concentration and easy access to credit gives rise to a strong economic instability and to a highly unequal distribution of wealth.

References

  1. 1.
    Calomiris C, Longhofer S, Miles W (2012) The housing wealth effect: the crucial roles of demographics, wealth distribution and wealth shares. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carroll CD (2001) A theory of the consumption function, with and without liquidity constraints. J Econ Perspect 15(3):23–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dosi G, Fagiolo G, Napoletano M, Roventini A (2013) Income distribution, credit and fiscal policies in an agent-based Keynesian model. J Econ Dyn Control 37(8):1598–1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Erlingsson E, Raberto M, Stefnsson H, Sturluson J (2013) Integrating the housing market into an agent-based economic model. In: Teglio A, Alfarano S, Camacho-Cuena E, Gin és-Vilar M (eds) Managing market complexity. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, vol 662. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 65–76Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Farmer J, Foley D (2009) The economy needs agent-based modelling. Nature 460(7256): 685–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Howell L (2013) Global risks 2013, 8th edn. Technical report, World Economic Forum, Cologny/GenevaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kirman A (1989) The intrinsic limits of modern economic theory: the emperor has no clothes. Econ J 99(395):126–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meen D, Meen G (2003) Social behaviour as a basis for modelling the urban housing market: a review. Urban Stud 40(5–6):917–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Persson T, Tabellini G (1991) Is inequality harmful for growth? theory and evidence. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Raberto M, Teglio A, Cincotti S (2012) Debt, deleveraging and business cycles: an agent-based perspective. Econ – Open-Access, Open-Assess E-J 6(27):1–49Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smets F, Wouters R, Europeo BC (2002) An estimated stochastic dynamic general equilibrium model of the Euro area. European Central Bank, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Teglio A, Raberto M, Cincotti S (2012) The impact of banks’ capital adequacy regulation on the economic system: an agent-based approach. Adv Complex Syst 15(supp02):1250040Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Teglio
    • 1
  • Silvano Cincotti
    • 2
  • Einar Jon Erlingsson
    • 3
  • Marco Raberto
    • 2
  • Hlynur Stefansson
    • 3
  • Jon Thor Sturluson
    • 3
  1. 1.Departament d’EconomiaUniversitat Jaume ICastellón de la PlanaSpain
  2. 2.DIMEUniversità di GenovaGenovaItaly
  3. 3.Reykjavik UniversityReykjavikIceland

Personalised recommendations