MEMS and Nanotechnology, Volume 5 pp 109-114 | Cite as
Molecular Interactions on InxGa1−xN
Abstract
Atomic force microscopy in solution offers a platform for assessing interactions on chemically modified surfaces. In this study a biologically relevant molecule, an amino acid, is adsorbed onto a compositionally varied semiconductor substrate. AFM is used to assess the effect of the substrate composition on the adhesion of the amino acid. We report adsorption of L-arginine to an indium-gallium-nitride (InGaN) substrate with a gradient of In:Ga composition. Data are collected above and below the isoelectric point of arginine to highlight the effect of protonation on the adhesive behavior across the InGaN. Characterization is also performed using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy to establish the presence of amino acid on the surface and determine the general composition of a given region of the substrate both with and without amino acid. Combining these factors, we are able to better evaluate the significance of substrate properties in influencing the behavior of surface molecules. Determining the dynamics of amino acid behavior as a function of both the substrate and the environment provides new insight into the preparation of semiconductor materials for biological applications.
Keywords
Amino acids Atomic force microscopy Composition gradient Indium gallium nitride X-ray photoelectron spectroscopyReferences
- 1.Davis RF (1991) III-V nitrides for electronic and optoelectronic applications. Proc IEEE 79(5):702–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Ponce FA, Bour DP (1997) Nitride-based semiconductors for blue and green light-emitting devices. Nature 386:351–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Jewett SA, Makowski MS, Andrews B, Manfra MJ, Ivanisevic A (2012) Gallium nitride is biocompatible and non-toxic before and after functionalization with peptides. Acta Biomater 8:728–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Gupta S, Elias M, Wen X, Shapiro J, Brillson L, Lu W, Lee SC (2008) Detection of clinically relevant levels of protein analyte under physiologic buffer using planar field effect transistors. Biosens Bioelectron 24(4):505–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Chin VWL, Tansley TL, Osotchan T (1994) Electron mobilities in gallium indium, and aluminum nitrides. J Appl Phys 75(11):7365–7372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Kuykendall T, Ulrich P, Aloni S, Yang P (2007) Complete composition tenability of InGaN nanowires using a combinatorial approach. Nat Mater 6:951–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Cimalla I, Will F, Tonisch K, Niebelschütz M, Cimalla V, Lebedev V, Kittler G, Himmerlich M, Krischok S, Schaefer JA, Gebinoga M, Schober A, Friedrich T, Ambacher O (2007) AlGaN/GaN biosensor – effect of device processing steps on the surface properties and biocompatibility. Sens Actuators B 123:740–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Chaniotakis N, Sofikiti N (2008) Novel semiconductor materials for the development of chemical sensors and biosensors: a review. Anal Chim Acta 615:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Slavin JWJ, Jarori U, Zemlyanov D, Ivanisevic A (2009) Characterization of amino acid adlayers on InAs surfaces using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenom 172:47–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Slavin JWJ, Zemlyanov D, Ivanisevic A (2009) Adsorption of amino acids on indium arsenide (100) surfaces: assessment of passivation capabilities. Surf Sci 603:907–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Makowski MS, Ivanisevic A (2001) Molecular analysis of blood with micro-/nanoscale field-effect-transistor biosensors. Small 7(14):1863–1875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.César M, Ke Y, Ji W, Guo H, Mi Z (2011) Band gap of InxGa1−xN: a first principles analysis. Appl Phys Lett 98:202107–202109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Chen Z, Su LW, Shi JY, Wang XL, Tang CL, Gao P (2012) AFM application in III-nitride materials and devices. In Bellitto V (ed) Atomic force microscopy – imaging, measuring, and manipulating surfaces at the atomic scale. InTech, pp 189–208Google Scholar
- 14.Goede K, Grundmann M, Holland-Nell K, Beck-Sickinger AG (2006) Cluster properties of peptides on (100) semiconductor surfaces. Langmuir 22:8104–8108CrossRefGoogle Scholar