Exegetical Science for the Interpretation of the Bible: Algorithms and Software for Quantitative Analysis of Christian Documents

Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 492)


Systematic thought (such as Christian theology) has primarily been investigated using literature-based approaches, with texts that are usually more abstract and subjective in nature than scientific papers. However, as systematic ideas and thought influence all areas of human activity and thinking, the application of scientific methodologies such as bibliometrics, natural language processing, and other information technologies may provide a more objective understanding of systematic thought. This paper introduces four methods of quantitative analysis for the interpretation of the Bible in a scientific manner. The methods are citation analysis for interpreters’ texts, vocabulary analysis for translations, variant text analysis for canonical texts, and an evaluation method for rhetorical structure. Furthermore, these algorithms are implemented for Java-based software.


Bible theology interpretation bibliometrics NLP 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Murai, H., Tokosumi, A.: Extracting concepts from religious knowledge resources and constructing classic analysis systems. In: Tokunaga, T., Ortega, A. (eds.) LKR 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4938, pp. 51–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murai, H., Tokosumi, A.: Co-citation network analysis of religious text. Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence 21(6), 473–481 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Murai, H.: Extracting the interpretive characteristics of translations based on the asymptotic correspondence vocabulary presumption method: Quantitative comparisons of Japanese translations of the Bible. Journal of Japan Society of Information and Knowledge 20(3), 293–310 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Landauer, T.K., Foltz, P.W., Laham, D.: Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes 25, 259–284 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Murai, H., Tokosumi, A.: Network analysis of the four Gospels and the Catechism of the Catholic Church. Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics 11(7), 772–779 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miyake, M., Akama, H., Sato, M., Nakagawa, M., Makoshi, N.: Tele-synopsis for biblical research: Development of NLP based synoptic software for text analysis as a mediator of educational technology and knowledge discovery. In: Conference on Educational Technology in Cultural Context (ETCC) in conjunction with ICALT, pp. 931–935 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Murai, H.: A study about validation methodology for classic rhetorical structure by utilizing digital archive. In: IPSJ SIG Computers and the Humanities Symposium 2011, vol. 8, pp. 211–218 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kurt, A.: Synopsis of the four Gospels revised standard version. The United Bible Societies (1982) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paul II, J.: Catechism of the Catholic Church (1992),
  10. 10.
    Murai, H.: Parallel concentric structure within the Gospel of Mark. Journal of Catholic Theological Society of Japan 20, 65–95 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murai, H.: The parallel concentric structures within Exodus. Society of Biblical Literature Annual Meeting (2010). Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Murai, H.: Rhetorical Structure of the Bible (2012),

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Decision ScienceTokyo Institute of TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations