Advertisement

Managing Automation Development Projects: A Comparison of Industrial Needs and Existing Theoretical Support

  • A. Granlund
  • M. Jackson
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The use of automation can increase competitiveness but does not guarantee advantageous results. The right choice of technology and correct implementation and use is the key to a successful outcome. This in turn puts great demands on how automation development projects are managed. The aim of this paper is to make a comparison between industrial needs and existing theoretical support associated with managing automation development projects. Through a multiple case study, challenges and success factors related to managing automation projects have been identified. The empirical findings are compared with automation development support found in literature. The results from the empirical study indicate the need for improved process models and clear strategy connected to automation development. The importance of an overall view and planning during automation projects is highlighted as a success factor while difficulties in collaborating with third parties is identified as existing challenges. It is concluded that the support in literature deals with many of the identified challenges and success factors and offers some support for specific parts of the automation development project. There is however still need for an overall framework connecting existing theoretical support, and suggesting how strategy can be connected to the process of developing automation.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research presented in this paper is carried out as part of an ongoing Swedish research project, Lean Automation Development funded by the FFI (Strategic Vehicle Research and Innovation) and VINNOVA. This project is a part of the XPRES environment at the department of Product Realisation at Mälardalen University. The authors would like to direct special thanks to the companies participating in the study for their time and effort in making this study possible.

References

  1. 1.
    Groover MP (2008) Automation, production systems, and computer-integrated manufacturing, Pearson EducationGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen IJ, Small MH (1996) Planning for advanced manufacturing technology: a research framework. Int J Oper Prod Manage 16(5):4–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baines T (2004) An integrated process for forming manufacturing technology acquisition decisions. Int J Oper Prod Manage 24(5):447–467MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Durrani TS, Forbes SM, Broadfoot C, Carrie AS (1998) Managing the technology acquisition process. Technovation 18(8/9):523–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jackson M, Hedelind M, Hellström E, Granlund A, Friedler N (2011) Lean automation: requirements and solutions for efficient use of robot automation in the swedish manufacturing industry. Int J Eng Res Innov 3(2):36–43Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frazelle EH (2001) World-class warehousing and materials handling, McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Porter M (2004) Competitive advantage—creating and sustaining superior performance, Free Press, Simon & SchusterGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sambasivarao KV, Deshmukh SG (1995) Selection and implementation of advanced manufacturing technologies: classification and literature review of issues. Int J Oper Prod Manage 15(10):43–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Winroth M, Säfsten K (2007) Automation strategies: existing theory or ad hoc decisions? Int J Manuf Technol Manage 11(1):98–114Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yin RK (1994) Case study research—design and methods, Sage Publications, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maxwell JA (2005) Qualitative research design, Sage Publications, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stake RE (2006) Multiple case study analysis, Guildford Publications, GuildfordGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Merriam SB (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education 2nd ed Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Trudel D, Goodwin C (1990) How to manage automation projects. InTech 37(5):38–41Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Arcibald RD (2003) Managing high-technology programs and projects, John Wiley & Sons, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hammer M (1990) Reengineering work: don’t automate, obliterate. Harvard Bus Rev 68(4):104–112Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Meredith JR (1987) Managing factory automation projects. J Manuf Syst 6(2):75–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Arvanitis S, Hollenstein H (2001) The determinants of the adoption of advanced manufacturing technology. Econ Innov New Technol 10(5):377–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Greenfield D (2003) Automation strategy increases volume, in Control Engineering, pp 57–58Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kotha S, Swamidass PM (2000) Strategy, advanced manufacturing technology and performance: empirical evidence from US manufacturing firms. J Oper Manage 18(3):257–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chiesa V, Manzini R (1998) Towards a framework for dynamic technology strategy. Technol Anal Strat Manage 10(1):111–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hax AC, No M (1992) Linking technology and business strategies: a methodological approach and an illustration, Working paper 3383-92BPS, Sloan School of Management, MIT BostonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ford D (1988) Develop your technology strategy. Long Range Plan 21(5):85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lindström V, Winroth M (2010) Aligning manufacturing strategy and levels of automation: A case study. J Eng Tech Manage 27(3–4):148–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Säfsten K, Winroth M, Stahre J (2007) The content and process of automation strategies. Int J Prod Econ 110(1–2):25–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Granlund A, Friedler N (2012) A model for the formulation of an automation strategy, The 4th world conference production & operations management, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hax AC, Majluf NS (1991) The strategy concept and process: a pragmatic approach, Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Langley A, Traux J (1994) A process study of new technology adaption in smaller manufacturing firms. J Manage Stud 31(5):619–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Product RealisationMälardalen UniversityEskilstunaSweden

Personalised recommendations