Self-Learning Production Systems: Adapter Reference Architecture
Abstract
To face globalization challenges, today manufacturing companies require new and more integrated monitoring and control solutions in order to optimize more and more their production processes to enable a faster fault detection, reducing down-times during production, and improving system performances and throughput. Today industrial monitoring and control solutions give only a partial view of the production systems status, what compromises the accurate assessment of the system. In this scenario, integrating monitoring and control solutions for secondary processes into shop floor core systems guarantees a comprehensive overview on the entire system and its related processes since it provides access to a greater amount of information than before. The research currently done under the scope of Self-Learning Production Systems (SLPS) tries to fill this gap by providing a new and integrated way for developing monitoring and control solutions. This paper introduces the research background and describes the generic SLPS architecture and focus on the Adapter component responsible for adapting the system according to current context information. The proposed Adapter architecture and its core components are introduced as well as the generic Adaptation Process, i.e., its “modus operandi” to face context changes. Finally, one of three distinct business-case scenarios is presented to demonstrate the applicability of the envisioned reference architecture and Adapter solution into an industrial context as well as its behavior and adaptive ability along system lifecycle.
Keywords
System Expert Flexible Machine System Learn Module Reasoning Task Proactive BehaviorNotes
Acknowledgments
This work is partly supported by the Self-Learning (Reliable self-learning production system based on context aware services) project of European Union 7th Framework Program, under the grant agreement no. NMP-2008-228857. This document does not represent the opinion of the European Community, and the European Community is not responsible for any use that might be made of its content. This work is also supported by FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia under project grant Pest-OE/EEI/UI0066/2011.
References
- 1.Levitt T (1993) The globalization markets. The MIT Press, vol 249Google Scholar
- 2.Narula R (2003) Globalization and technology: interdependence, innovation systems and industrial policy. WileyGoogle Scholar
- 3.Noble DF (2011) Forces of production: a social history of industrial automation. Transaction PublishersGoogle Scholar
- 4.Van Dyke Parunak H (1998) What can agents do in industry, and why? An overview on industrially-oriented R&D at CEC. In: Presented at the second international workshop on cooperative information agents II, learning, mobility and electronic commerce for information discovery on the internetGoogle Scholar
- 5.Rosiná F, Temperini S (2010) Advanced maintenance strategies for a sustainable manufacturing. In: 10th IFAC workshop on intelligent manufacturing systems (IMS’10), LisbonGoogle Scholar
- 6.Jovane F, Westkämper E, Williams DJ (2009) The ManuFuture road: towards competitive and sustainable high-adding-value manufacturing. SpringerGoogle Scholar
- 7.Cannata A, Gerosa M, Taisch M (2008) A technology roadmap on SOA for smart embedded devices: towards intelligent systems in manufacturing. In: IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management, 2008. IEEM 2008, pp 762–767Google Scholar
- 8.Candido G, Colombo AW, Barata J, Jammes F (2011) Service-oriented infrastructure to support the deployment of evolvable production systems. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 7(4):759–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Uddin MK, Dvoryanchikova A, Lastra JLM, Scholze S, Stokic D, Candido G, Barata J (2011) Service oriented computing to self-learning production system. In: 2011 9th IEEE international conference on industrial informatics (INDIN), pp 212–217Google Scholar
- 10.Kotsiantis SB (2007) Supervised machine learning: a review of classification techniques. Informatica 31:249–268MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
- 11.Kohavi R, A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection.Google Scholar
- 12.Stecke KE (1985) Design, planning, scheduling, and control problems of flexible manufacturing systems. Ann Oper Res 3(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Jain AK, Elmaraghy HA (1997) Production scheduling/rescheduling in flexible manufacturing. Int J Prod Res 35(1):281–309MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Rossi A, Dini G (2000) Dynamic scheduling of FMS using a real-time genetic algorithm. Int J Prod Res 38(1):1–20MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Reyes A, Yu H, Kelleher G, Lloyd S (2002) Integrating petri nets and hybrid heuristic search for the scheduling of FMS. Comput Ind 47(1):123–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar