Advertisement

Application of Hybrid Agents to Smart Energy Management of a Prosumer Node

  • Pasquale CaianielloEmail author
  • Stefania Costantini
  • Giovanni De Gasperis
  • Niva Florio
  • Federico Gobbo
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 217)

Abstract

In this paper we propose an intelligent control scheme based on a multiagent system composed of two main components: a logical planner and forecaster obtained by machine learning techniques. The chosen benchmark application lays in the field of smart energy management, were we consider the concept of a prosumer node. We discuss a case-study where a simplified multi-agent system is applied to the supervision of an air conditioner, leading to an energy saving of about 17%.

Keywords

hybrid agents energy management prosumer node 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barringer, H., Fisher, M., Gabbay, D., Gough, G., Owens, R.: Metatem: An introduction. Formal Aspects of Computing 7(5), 533–549 (1995)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Gasperis, G., Bevar, V., Costantini, S., Tocchio, A., Paolucci, A.: Demonstrator of a multi-agent system for industrial fault detection and repair. In: Demazeau, Y., Müller, J.P., Rodríguez, J.M.C., Pérez, J.B. (eds.) Advances on PAAMS. AISC, vol. 155, pp. 237–240. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chandy, M.K., Etzion, O.O., von Ammon, R.: 10201 Executive Summary and Manifesto – Event Processing. In: Event Processing, Dagstuhl, Germany. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, vol. 10201. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Germany (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Costantini, S., Tocchio, A.: About declarative semantics of logic-based agent languages. In: Baldoni, M., Endriss, U., Omicini, A., Torroni, P. (eds.) DALT 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3904, pp. 106–123. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Costantini, S., De Gasperis, G.: Complex reactivity with preferences in rule-based agents. In: Bikakis, A., Giurca, A. (eds.) RuleML 2012. LNCS, vol. 7438, pp. 167–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Costantini, S., Tocchio, A.: A logic programming language for multi-agent systems. In: Flesca, S., Greco, S., Leone, N., Ianni, G. (eds.) JELIA 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2424, pp. 1–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Costantini, S., Tocchio, A.: The DALI logic programming agent-Oriented language. In: Alferes, J.J., Leite, J. (eds.) JELIA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3229, pp. 685–688. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Costantini, S., Tocchio, A.: A dialogue games framework for the operational semantics of logic agent-oriented languages. In: Dix, J., Leite, J., Governatori, G., Jamroga, W. (eds.) CLIMA XI. LNCS, vol. 6245, pp. 238–255. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dastani, M., Birna Riemsdijk, M., Meyer, J.-J.: Programming multi-agent systems in 3apl. Multi-agent Programming, 39–67 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dastani, M., De Boer, F., Dignum, F., Meyer, J.-J.: Programming agent deliberation: an approach illustrated using the 3apl language. In: Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 97–104. ACM (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Gasperis, G., De Lorenzo, M.G., Muzi, M.: Intelligence improvement of a prosumer node through the predictive concept. In: Proceedings of the Sixth UKSim European Symposium on Computer Modeling and Simulation. IEEE Computer Society, Malta (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fisher, M.: A survey of concurrent metatem-the language and its applications. Temporal Logic, 480–505 (1994)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fisher, M.: Metatem: The story so far. Programming Multi-Agent Systems, 3–22 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fisher, M., Bordini, R.H., Hirsch, B., Torroni, P.: Computational logics and agents. a roadmap of current technologies and future trends. Computational Intelligence (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kakas, A.C., Mancarella, P., Sadri, F., Stathis, K., Toni, F.: Computational logic foundations of kgp agents. J. Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR) 33, 285–348 (2008)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mulder, M., Treur, J., Fisher, M.: Agent modelling in metatem and desire. In: Intelligent Agents IV Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, pp. 193–207 (1998)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Narayanasamy, G., Cecil, J., Son, T.C.: A collaborative framework to realize virtual enterprises using 3apl. In: Baldoni, M., Endriss, U. (eds.) DALT 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4327, pp. 191–206. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pasquale Caianiello
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stefania Costantini
    • 1
  • Giovanni De Gasperis
    • 1
  • Niva Florio
    • 1
  • Federico Gobbo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information Engineering, Computer Science and MathematicsUniversity of L’AquilaL’AquilaItaly

Personalised recommendations