Advertisement

Subgrid-Scale Parameterization in Numerical Simulations of Lake Circulation

  • Kolumban HutterEmail author
  • Yongqi Wang
  • Irina P. Chubarenko
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Geophysical and Environmental Mechanics and Mathematics book series (AGEM)

Abstract

Turbulence is ubiquitous in geophysical flows. There are hardly any situations in the dynamics of natural waters and the atmosphere that do not involve turbulent effects at some point, and only little insight can be gained in the dominant processes, if turbulence is not taken into account. Thus, the modelling of this phenomenon has attracted a great many researchers and more and more advanced models, suitable for the description of a large variety of geophysical flows, evolved over the last decades. A general model embracing all aspects of turbulence is still out of reach. Nevertheless, there has been an enormous progress in the understanding of turbulence in the past. More recently, Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS) and Large Eddy Simulations (LES) provided data that were previously only available by high-precision laboratory setups (or not at all) and had a large impact on the development of new turbulence models. It seems likely that, especially in oceanography and meteorology, LES will take a position equitable to the ensemble averaged methods in the near future. At present, however, in spite of the development of larger and faster computers, LES is still too expensive for standard simulations of geophysical interest. In this chapter, we will mainly investigate a simple parameterization of the subgrid-scale turbulent closure which is based on the Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes Equations (RANS) and the subgrid-scale eddy viscosity parameterizations. We employ the three-dimensional, hydrodynamic, semi-implicit, finite difference model, developed by Song and Haidvogel and extended for the TVD treatment of the advection terms by Y. Wang. Subgrid-Scale Parameterization in Numerical Simulations of Lake Circulation are used and Smagorinsky’s formulation and MellorYamada ’s level-2.5 model are used to parameterize the horizontal and vertical eddy viscosities. Numerical results in an assumed rectangular basin with constant depth and in Lake Constance are displayed and discussed. A comparison is made with prescribed constant eddy viscosities; it clearly shows the importance of subgrid-scale parameterizations in numerical simulations of lake circulation. We do not claim that such subgrid-scale parameterizations are the best choice of possible closure conditions, but only show that suitable parameterizations of the small-scale (subgrid-scale) turbulent motions are needed.

Keywords

Turbulent Kinetic Energy Direct Numerical Simulation Eddy Viscosity Vertical Eddy Viscosity Turbulent Eddy Viscosity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Appt, J., Imberger, J. and Kobus, H.: Basin-scale motion in stratified Upper Lake Constance. Limnol Oceanogr., 49(4), 919–933 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bastiaans, R.J.M., Rindt, C.C.M. and Van, A.A.: Experimental analysis of a confined transitional plume with respect to subgrid-scale modelling. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 41, 3989–4007 (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bäuerle, E.: Transverse baroclinic oscillations in Lake Überlingen. Aquatic Sciences, 56(2), 145–160 (1994)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blumberg, A.F., and Mellor, G.L.: A Description of a three-dimensional coastal ocean circulation model. In: Mooers (Ed.), Three-dimensional Coastal Ocean Models, Coastal and Estuarine Sciences, 4, 1–16 (1987)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Businger, J.A., Wyngaard, J.C., Izumi, Y. and Bradley, E.F.: Flux profile relationships in the atmospheric surface layer. J. Atmos. Sci., 28, 181–189 (1971)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deardorff, J.W.: A numerical study of three-dimensional turbulent channel flow at large Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech., 41, 453–480 (1970)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deardorff, J.W.: On the magnitude of the subgrid scale eddy coefficient. J. Comput. Phys., 7, 120–133 (1971)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Domaradski, J.A., Liu, W., Brachet, M.E.: An analysis of subgrid-scale interactions in numerically simulated isotropic turbulence. Phys Fluids A, 5, 1749–1759 (1993)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P., and Cabot, W.H.: A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys. Fluids A, 3(7), 1760–1765 (1991)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Güting, P.M. and Hutter, K.: Modeling wind-induced circulation in the homogeneous Lake Constance using \(k\)-\(\varepsilon \) closure. Aquat. Sci., 60, 266–277 (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haidvogel, D.B., Wilkin, J.L. and Young, R.: A semi-spectral primitive equation ocean circulation model using vertical sigma and orthogonal curvilinear horizontal coordinates. J. Comput. Phys., 94, 151–185 (1991)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heinz, G.: Strömungen im Bodensee. Ergebnisse einer Meßkampagne im Herbst 1993. Mitteilungen der VAW der ETH Zürich, 135, 237p (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Higgins, C.W., Parlange, M.B. and Meneveau, C.: The heat flux and the temperature gradient in the lower atmosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L22105 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hollan, E.: Strömungsmessungen im Bodensee. Sechster Bericht der AWBR, 6, 112–187 (1974)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Horst, T. W., Kleissl, J., Lenschow, D.H., Meneveau, C., Moeng, C.-H., Parlange, M.B., Sullivan, P.P. and Weil, J.C.: HATS: Field observations to obtain spatially filtered turbulence fields from transverse arrays of sonic anemometers in the atmospheric surface layer. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1566–1581 (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hutter, K.: Mathematische Vorhersage von barotropen und baroklinen Prozessen im Zürich- und Luganersee. Vierteljahrschrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich, 129, 51–92 (1984)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hutter, K. and Jöhnk, K.: Continuum Methods of Physical Modeling. Springer Verlag, Berlin etc., 635 p. (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ip, J.T.C. and Lynch, D.R.: Three-dimensional shallow water hydrodynamics on finite elements: Nonlinear time-stepping prognostic model. Report NML-94-1, Numerical Methods Laboratory, Dartmouth College, Hanover NH, USA 03755 (1994)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Killworth, P.D., Stainforth, D., Webb, D.J. and Paterson, S.M.: The development of a free-surface Bryan-Cox-Semtner ocean model. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 21, 1211–1223 (1991)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lewellen, W.S. and Teske, M.: Prediction of the Monin-Obukhov similarity functions from an invariant model of turbulence. J. Atoms. Sci., 30, 1340–1345 (1973)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lilly, D.K.: The representation of small-scale turbulence in numerical simulation experiments. Proc. IBM Scientific Computing Symposium on Environmental Sciences, Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, 195–210 (1967)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu, S., Katz, J. and Meneveau, C.: Evolution and modeling of subgrid scales during rapid straining of turbulence. J. Fluid Mech., 387, 281–320 (1999)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Maiss, M., Ilmberger, J. and Münnich, K.O.: Vertical mixing in Überlingersee (Lake Constance) traced by a SF\(_6\) and heat. Aquatic Sciences, 56(4), 329–347 (1994)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mansour, N.N., Moin, P., Reynolds, W.C. and Ferziger, J.H.: Improved methods for large-eddy simulations of turbulence. In: Durst, editor. Proceeding of the 1st Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows. University Park, PA, USA. Berlin, Springer (1979)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Martin, P.J.: Simulation of the mixed layer at OWS November and Papa with several models. J. Geophys. Res.,90, 903–916 (1985)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mason, P.J. and Callen, N.S.: On the magnitude of the subgrid-scale eddy coefficient in large-eddy simulations of turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech., 162, 439–462 (1986)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mellor, G.L.: Analytic prediction of the properties of stratified planetary surface layers. J. Atoms. Sci., 30, 1061–1069 (1973)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mellor, G.L. and Yamada, T.: A hierarchy of turbulence closure models for planetary boundary layers. J. Atoms. Sci., 31, 1791–1806 (1974)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mellor, G.L., and Yamada, T.: Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys., 20, 851–875 (1982)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Meneveau, C. and Katz, J.: Scale-invariance and turbulence models for large-eddy simulation. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 32, 1–32 (2000)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Moin P. and Kim, J.: Numerical investigation of turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech., 118, 341–377 (1982)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    O’Neil J, Meneveau C.: Subgrid-scale stresses and their modeling in a turbulent plane wake. J. Fluid Mech., 349, 253–293 (1997)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Peeters, F.: Horizontale Mischung in Seen. PhD thesis, ETH Zürich (1994)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Piomelli, U., Moin, P. and Perziger, J.H.: Model consistency in large eddy simulation of turbulent channel flows. Phys. Fluids, 31, 1884–1891 (1988)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pohlmann, T.: A three dimensional circulation model of the South China Sea. In: Nihoul and Jamart (eds.) Three-Dimensional Models of Marine and Estuarine, Dynamics, 245–268 (1987)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Piomelli, U., Perziger, J.H. and Moin, P.: New approximate boundary conditions for large eddy simulations of wall-boundary flows. Phys. Fluids A, 1, 1061–1068 (1987)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Porté-Agel, F., Meneveau, C. and Parlange, M.B.: A scale-dependent dynamic model for large-eddy simulation: application to a neutral atmospheric boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech., 415, 261–284 (2000)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Porté-Agel, F, Parlange, M.B., Meneveau, C. and Eichinger, W.: A priori field study of the subgrid-scale heat fluxes and dissipation in the atmospheric surface layer. J. Atmospheric Sciences, 58, 2673–2698 (2001)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Porté-Agel, F., Pahlow, M., Meneveau, C. and Parlange, M.B.: Atmospheric stability effect on subgrid-scale physics for large-eddy simulation. Adv. in Water Resources, 24(9-10), 1085–1102 (2001)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Smagorinsky, J.S.: General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic experiment. Mon. Weather Rev., 91, 99–164 (1963)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Song, Y. and Haidvogel, D.B.: A semi-implicit ocean circulation model using a generalized topography-following coordinate. J. Comp. Phys., 115, 228–244 (1994)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sullivan, P.P., Horst, T.W., Lenschow, D.H., Moeng, C.H. and Weil, J.C.: Structure of subfilter-scale fluxes in the atmospheric surface layer with application to large-eddy simulation modeling. J. Fluid Mech., 482, 101–139 (2003)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tong, C., Wyngaard, J.C. and Brasseur. J.G.: Experimental study of the subgrid-scale stresses in the atmospheric surface layer. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 2277–2292 (1999)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Uberoi, M.S.: Effect of wind-tunnel contraction on free stream turbulence. J. Aeronaut Sci., 23, 754–764 (1956)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Umlauf, L. and Burchard, H.: A generic length-scale equation for geophysical turbulence models. J. Marine Res., 61, 235–265 (2003)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Umlauf, L., Burchard, H. and Hutter, K.: Extending the \(k\)-\(\omega \) turbulent model towards oceanic applications. Ocean Modelling, 5, 195–218 (2003)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Walker, S.J.: A 3-dimensional non-linear variable density hydrodynamic model with curvilinear coordinates. Tech. Rep. OMR-60/00, CSIRO Division of Oceanography (1995)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wang, Y., Hutter, K. and Bäuerle, E.: Wind-induced baroclinic response of Lake Constance. Annales Geophysicae, 18, 1488–1501 (2000)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wang, Y.: Comparing different numerical treatments of advection terms for wind-induced circulations in Lake Constance. In: Straughan, B., Greve, R., Ehrentraut, H., and Wang, Y. (Eds.). Continuum Mechanics and Applications in Geophysics and the Environment. Springer, Heidelberg-New York, 368–393 (2001)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wang, Y.: Importance of subgrid-scale parameterization in numerical simulations of lake circulation. Adv. Water Res., 26(3), 277–294 (2003)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Warner, J.C., Sherwood, C.R., Arango, H.G. and Signell, R.P.: Performance of four Turbulence Closure Methods Implemented using a Generic Length Scale Method. Ocean Modelling, 8, 81–113 (2005)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wilcox, D.C.: Turbulence Modeling for CFD. DCW Industries, Inc., La Ca\(\tilde{\rm {n}}\)ada, CA., p. 540 (1998)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zenger, A., Ilmberger, J., Heinz, G., Schimmele, M. and Münnich, K.O.: Untersuchungen zur Struktur der internen Seiches des Bodensees. Wasserwirtschaft, 79(12), 616–624 (1989)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kolumban Hutter
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yongqi Wang
    • 2
  • Irina P. Chubarenko
    • 3
  1. 1.c/o Laboratory of Hydraulics, Hydrology and Glaciology at ETHZürichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Chair of Fluid Dynamics, Department of Mechanical EngineeringTU DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany
  3. 3.P.P. Shirshov Institute of OceanologyRussian Academy of SciencesKaliningradRussia

Personalised recommendations