Studying the Baltic Sea Circulation with Eulerian Tracers

Abstract

As shipping of environmentally hazardous cargo, like oil, has increased considerably in the Baltic in recent years, methods are needed to calculate the fairways between two harbours such that hazardous substances from a hypothetical accident will stay as long as possible away from ecologically sensitive areas like the coastal zone. For this purpose an ensemble approach based upon Eulerian tracer simulations is presented which has the potential to be further developed to become operational for the optimization of fairways. First, we introduce and compare Eulerian and Lagrangian descriptions of any fluid in general. Second, a three-dimensional circulation model of the Baltic Sea is presented from which currents are used to calculate the evolution of the Eulerian tracers in time that obey traditional advection-diffusion equations. The model set-up is presented in detail to illustrate the potential of ocean circulation models for our purposes but also their shortcomings. Third, examples of studies using Eulerian tracers are presented that analyse the characteristics of the circulation, like ventilation time scales and age of water masses. Finally, we focus on three selected examples of oil spill modelling using Eulerian methods. Although oil spill modelling very often utilizes a Lagrangian particle approach, we show that even Eulerian methods can be used that might under certain circumstances have some advantages compared to the Lagrangian approach.

Keywords

Ocean Circulation Model Passive Tracer Bornholm Basin Wind Speed Extreme Danish Strait 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research presented in this study is part of the project BalticWay (The potential of currents for environmental management of the Baltic Sea maritime industry) and has received funding from the European Commission’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7 2007–2013) under Grant agreement No. 217246 made with BONUS, the joint Baltic Sea research and development program, and from the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (Formas, Ref. No. 2008–1898).

References

  1. Anomymous (2002) An updated assessment of the risk for oil spills in the Baltic Sea area. Presented as a Status report on risk analyses for use in response to oil pollution in the Baltic Sea by Dr S Ovsienko, Fifth meeting of the Sea-based Pollution Group HELCOM SEA, Turku, Finland, 13–17 May 2002. Helsinki Commission, Helsinki, 77 pp. http://www.helcom.fi/stc/files/shipping/RiskforOilSpillsReport2002.pdf
  2. Andrejev O, Myrberg K, Alenius P, Lundberg PA (2004a) Mean circulation and water exchange in the Gulf of Finland—a study based on three-dimensional modelling. Boreal Environ Res 9:1–16 Google Scholar
  3. Andrejev O, Myrberg K, Lundberg PA (2004b) Age and renewal time of water masses in a semi-enclosed basin—application to the Gulf of Finland. Tellus A 56:548–558 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ASCE, Task Committee on modeling of oil spills of the Water Resources Engineering Division (1996) State-of-the-art review of modeling transport and fate of oil spills. J Hydraul Eng 122:594–609 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergström S, Carlsson B (1994). River runoff to the Baltic Sea: 1950–1990. Ambio 23:280–287 Google Scholar
  6. Blanke B, Delecluse P (1993) Variability of the Tropical Atlantic Ocean simulated by a general circulation model with two different mixed layer physics. J Phys Oceanogr 23:1363–1388 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bodin S (1979) A predictive numerical model of the atmospheric boundarylayer based on the turbulent energy equation. Rep Meteorol Climatol 13, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping, 139 pp Google Scholar
  8. Bolin B, Rodhe H (1973) A note on the concepts of age distribution and transit term in natural reservoirs. Tellus 25:58–62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bryan K (1969) A numerical method for the study of the circulation of the World Ocean. J Comput Phys 4:347–376 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bryan K, Cox MD (1972) An approximate equation of state for numerical models of ocean circulation. J Phys Oceanogr 2:510–514 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bumke K, Hasse L (1989) An analysis scheme for the determination of true surfacewinds at sea from ship synoptic wind and pressure observations. Bound-Layer Meteorol 47:295–308 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cox MD (1984) A primitive equation 3-dimensional model of the ocean. Technical Report 1, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 141 pp Google Scholar
  13. Dee DP, Uppala SM, Simmons AJ, Berrisford P, Poli P, Kobayashi S, Andrae U, Balmaseda MA, Balsamo G, Bauer P, Bechtold P, Beljaars ACM, van de Berg L, Bidlot J, Bormann N, Delsol C, Dragani R, Fuentes M, Geer AJ, Haimberger L, Healy SB, Hersbach H, Holm EV, Isaksen L, Kallberg P, Koehler M, Matricardi M, McNally AP, Monge-Sanz BM, Morcrette J-J, Park BK, Peubey C, de Rosnay P, Tavolato C, Thepaut J-N, Vitart F (2011) The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137:553–597 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deleersnijder E, Campin J-M, Delhez EJM (2001) The concept of age in marine modelling. I. Theory and preliminary model results. J Mar Syst 28:229–267 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Delhez EJM, Campin J-M, Hirst AC, Deleersnijder E (1999) Towards a general theory of the age in ocean modelling. Ocean Model 1:17–27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dera J (1992) Marine physics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 516 pp Google Scholar
  17. Engqvist A (1996) Long-term nutrient balances in the eutrophication of the Himmerfjärden estuary. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 42:483–507 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fennel W, Neumann T (2004) Introduction to the modeling of marine ecosystems. Elsevier oceanography series, vol 72. Elsevier, Boston, 89 pp Google Scholar
  19. Fennel W, Seifert T, Kayser B (1991) Rossby radii and phase speeds in the Baltic Sea. Cont Shelf Res 11:23–36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gerdes R, Köberle C, Willebrand J (1991) The influence of numerical advection schemes on the results of ocean general circulation models. Clim Dyn 5:211–226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gill AE (1982) Atmosphere–ocean dynamics. Academic Press, London, 662 pp Google Scholar
  22. Gin K, Huda K, Lim WK, Tkalich P (2001) An oil spill-food chain interaction model for coastal waters. Mar Pollut Bull 42:590–597 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Graham PL (1999) Modeling runoff to the Baltic Sea. Ambio 27:328–334 Google Scholar
  24. Guo WJ, Wang YX (2009) A numerical oil spill model based on a hybrid method. Mar Pollut Bull 58:726–734 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gustafsson T, Kullenberg B (1936) Untersuchungen vor Trägheitströmungen in der Ostsee (Investigations of inertial currents in the Baltic Sea). Sven Hydrogr-Biol Komm Skr, Ny Ser Hydr 13:1–28 Google Scholar
  26. Höglund A, Meier HEM (2012) Environmentally safe areas and routes in the Baltic Proper using Eulerian tracers. Mar Pollut Bull 64:1375–1385 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Höglund A, Meier HEM, Broman B, Kriezi E (2009) Validation and correction of regionalised ERA-40 wind fields over the Baltic Sea using the Rossby Centre Atmosphere Model RCA3.0. Rapport Oceanografi No 97, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping, Sweden 29 pp Google Scholar
  28. Jakobsen F (1995) The major inflow to the Baltic Sea during January 1993. J Mar Syst 6:227–240 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jȩdrasik J, Cieślikiewicz W, Kowalewski M, Bradtke K, Jankowski A (2008) 44 years hindcast of the sea level and circulation in the Baltic Sea. Coast Eng 55:849–860 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jerlov NG (1968) Optical oceanography. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 194 pp Google Scholar
  31. Kauker F, Meier HEM (2003) Modeling decadal variability of the Baltic Sea: 1. Reconstructing atmospheric surface data for the period 1902–1998. J Geophys Res—Oceans 108:3267 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krauss W (1973) Dynamics of the homogeneous and the quasihomogeneous ocean. Gebrüder Bornträger, Berlin, 302 pp Google Scholar
  33. Killworth P, Stainforth D, Webb D, Paterson S (1991) The development of a free-surface Bryan–Cox–Semtner ocean model. J Phys Oceanogr 21:1333–1348 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Large WG, Pond S (1981) Open ocean momentum flux measurements in moderate to strong winds. J Phys Oceanogr 11:324–336 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Large WG, Pond S (1982) Sensible and latent heat flux measurements over the ocean. J Phys Oceanogr 12:464–482 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lehmann A (1995) A 3-dimensional baroclinic eddy-resolving model of the Baltic Sea. Tellus A 47:1013–1031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lehmann A, Hinrichsen H-H (2000) On the thermohaline variability of the Baltic Sea. J Mar Syst 25:333–357 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Löptien U, Meier HEM (2011) The influence of increasing water turbidity on the sea surface temperature in the Baltic Sea: a model sensitivity study. J Mar Syst 88:323–331 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Luhamaa A, Kimmel K, Männik A, Rõõm R (2011) High resolution re-analysis for the Baltic Sea region during 1965–2005 period. Clim Dyn 36:727–738 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mårtensson S, Meier HEM, Pemberton P, Haapala J (2012) Ridged sea ice characteristics in the Arctic from a coupled multicategory sea ice model. J Geophys Res—Oceans 117:C00D15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Matthäus W, Lass HU, Tiesel R (1993) The major Baltic inflow in January 1993. ICES Statutory Meeting. ICES CM 1993/C:51 Google Scholar
  42. Meier HEM (2001) On the parameterization of mixing in three-dimensional Baltic Sea models. J Geophys Res—Oceans 106:30997–31016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Meier HEM (2002) Regional ocean climate simulations with a 3D ice-ocean model for the Baltic Sea. Part 1: model experiments and results for temperature and salinity. Clim Dyn 19:237–253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meier HEM (2005) Modeling the age of Baltic Sea water masses: quantification and steady-state sensitivity experiments. J Geophys Res—Oceans 110:C02006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Meier HEM (2007) Modeling the pathways and ages of inflowing salt- and freshwater in the Baltic Sea. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 74:610–627 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Meier HEM, Kauker F (2003) Modeling decadal variability of the Baltic Sea: 2. The role of freshwater inflow and large-scale atmospheric circulation for salinity. J Geophys Res—Oceans 108:3368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Meier HEM, Döscher R, Coward AC, Nycander J, Döös K (1999) RCO—Rossby Centre regional Ocean climate model: Model description (version 1.0) and first results from the hindcast period 1992/93. Rapport Oceanografi No 26, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping, Sweden, 102 pp Google Scholar
  48. Meier HEM, Döscher R, Faxén T (2003) A multiprocessor coupled ice-ocean model for the Baltic Sea: application to salt inflow. J Geophys Res—Oceans 108:3273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Meier HEM, Döscher R, Broman B, Piechura J (2004) The major Baltic inflow in January 2003 and preconditioning by smaller inflows in summer/autumn 2002: a model study. Oceanologia 46:557–579 Google Scholar
  50. Meier HEM, Höglund A, Döscher R, Andersson H, Löptien U, Kjellström E (2011) Quality assessment of atmospheric surface fields over the Baltic Sea of an ensemble of regional climate model simulations with respect to ocean dynamics. Oceanologia 53:193–227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mesinger F, Arakawa A (1976) Numerical methods used in atmospheric models. GARP publications series 17, vol I. WMO, Geneva, 64 pp Google Scholar
  52. Müller P, Willebrand J (1989) Equations for oceanic motions. In: Sündermann J (ed) Landolt-Börnstein, group V. Oceanography, vol 3b Google Scholar
  53. Myrberg K, Andrejev O (2003) Main upwelling regions in the Baltic Sea—a statistical analysis based on three-dimensional modelling. Boreal Environ Res 8:97–112 Google Scholar
  54. Myrberg K, Andrejev O (2006) Modelling of the circulation, water exchange and water age properties of the Gulf of Bothnia. Oceanologia 48(S):55–74 Google Scholar
  55. Neumann T, Fennel W, Kremp C (2002) Experimental simulations with an ecosystem model of the Baltic Sea: a nutrient load reduction experiment. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 16:1033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Omstedt A, Chen Y, Wesslander K (2005) A comparison between the ERA40 and the SMHI gridded meteorological databases as applied to Baltic Sea modeling. Nord Hydrol 36:369–380 Google Scholar
  57. Palmén E (1930) Untersuchungen über die Strömungen in den Finnland umgebenden Meeren. Commentationes physico-mathematicae, vol 12. Societas Scientarium Fennica, Helsinki Google Scholar
  58. Paulson CA, Simpson JJ (1977) Irradiance measurements in the upper ocean. J Phys Oceanogr 7:952–956 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Reed M, Johansen O, Brandvik PJ, Daling P, Lewis A, Fiocco R, Mackay D, Prentki R (1999) Oil spill modeling towards the close of the 20th century: overview of the state of the art. Spill Sci Technol Bull 5:3–16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rodi W (1980) Turbulence models and their application in hydraulics—a state-of-the-art review. International Association of Hydraulic Research, Delft, 104 pp Google Scholar
  61. Samuelsson P, Jones CG, Willén U, Ullerstig A, Gollvik S, Hansson U, Jansson C, Kjellström E, Nikulin G, Wyser K (2011) The Rossby Centre Regional Climate model RCA3: model description and performance. Tellus A 63:4–23 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Seifert T, Tauber F, Kayser B (2001) A high resolution spherical grid topography of the Baltic Sea, 2nd edition. In: Baltic Sea science congress, Stockholm, 25–29 November 2001, Poster #147, www.io-warnemuende.de/iowtopo Google Scholar
  63. Semtner AJ (1974) A general circulation model for the World Ocean. Technical Report 9, Department of Meteorology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, 99 pp Google Scholar
  64. Sjöberg B (ed) (1992) Hav och Kust. Sveriges Nationalatlas Förlag. Almquist & Wiksell International, Stockholm Google Scholar
  65. Smagorinsky J (1963) General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic experiment. Mon Weather Rev 91:99–164 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Steinhorn I (1991) Notes and correspondence—salt flux and evaporation. J Phys Oceanogr 21:1681–1683 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stevens DP (1991) The open boundary condition in the United Kingdom fine-resolution Antarctic model. J Phys Oceanogr 21:1494–1499 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tkalich P, Huda K, Gin KYH (2003) A multiphase oil spill model. J Hydraul Res 41:115–125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. UNESCO (1981) United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. Tenth report of the joint panel on oceanographic tables and standards, UNESCO technical papers in marine science 36, 26 pp Google Scholar
  70. Uppala SM, Kållberg PW, Simmons AJ, Andrae U, da Costa Bechtold V, Fiorino M, Gibson JK, Haseler J, Hernandez A, Kelly GA, Li X, Onogi K, Saarinen S, Sokka N, Allan RP, Andersson E, Arpe K, Balmaseda MA, Beljaars ACM, van de Berg L, Bidlot J, Bormann N, Caires S, Chevallier F, Dethof A, Dragosavac M, Fisher M, Fuentes M, Hagemann S, Hólm E, Hoskins BJ, Isaksen L, Janssen PAEM, Jenne R, McNally AP, Mahfouf J-F, Morcrette J-J, Rayner NA, Saunders RW, Simon P, Sterl A, Trenberth KE, Untch A, Vasiljevic D, Viterbo P, Woollen J (2005) The ERA-40 re-analysis. Q J R Meteorol Soc 131:2961–3012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Webb DJ, Coward AC, de Cuevas BA, Gwilliam CS (1997) A multiprocessor ocean circulation model using message passing. J Atmos Ocean Technol 14:175–183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Webb DJ, de Cuevas BA, Richmond CS (1998) Improved advection schemes for ocean models. J Atmos Ocean Technol 15:1171–1187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological InstituteNorrköpingSweden
  2. 2.Department of MeteorologyStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations