Applications of an Oil Drift and Fate Model for Fairway Design


Pollutants at sea undergo weathering related changes in the composition and are transported by winds, waves and currents. Methods are needed to study the impact of changing weather and ocean conditions on oil chemistry and physics and to estimate all the driving forces of oil transport at sea. The present study highlights the potential of operational oil drift and fate models for the analysis of systematic drift patterns that has been prevented so far by their numerical complexity. A large number of drift simulations are performed to cover a three years period 1992–1994, with 8 releases per month on a grid of 528 release positions in the Gulf of Finland. Although sparse in resolution, the results are still characteristic. Large-scale wind induced drift has been found to dominate the surface transport during windy seasons, and to be of similar magnitude as the current drift during calm seasons. Currents dominate the subsurface transport regime, and become more and more significant at later stages of the spill development, when more and more oil droplets are mixed down by waves. To estimate the combined effects of oil transport and oil weathering, seasonal drift patterns are analysed and alternative fairway designs are derived using a Monte Carlo technique. The quality of the designs is evaluated under environmental and economical viewpoints using professional ship routing software. We demonstrate that it is possible to find balanced solutions that are economically beneficial and that follow green goals like low fuel consumption and reduced risk for coastal oil pollution. Wave-driven advection of oil spills has been studied for the one-year period of 1992, to cover a seasonal cycle. It has been found to impact oil propagation in areas where the wave field exhibits strong gradients, e.g., at locations with depth gradients and in the wind shadow of islands.


  1. Andrejev O, Myrberg K, Alenius P, Lundberg PA (2004) Mean circulation and water exchange in the Gulf of Finland—a study based on three-dimensional modelling. Boreal Environ Res 9:1–16 Google Scholar
  2. Andrejev O, Sokolov A, Soomere T, Värv R, Viikmäe B (2010) The use of high-resolution bathymetry for circulation modelling in the Gulf of Finland. Est J Eng 16:187–210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrejev O, Soomere T, Sokolov A, Myrberg K (2011) The role of spatial resolution of a three-dimensional hydrodynamic model for marine transport risk assessment. Oceanologia 53:309–334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ardhuin F, Marie L, Rascle N, Forget P, Roland A (2009) Observation and estimation of Lagrangian, Stokes, and Eulerian currents induced by wind and waves at the sea surface. J Phys Oceanogr 39:2820–2838 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Audunson T (1980) The fate and weathering of surface oil from Bravo blowout. Mar Environ Res 3:35–61 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berg P (2012) Mixing in HBM. Scientific Report 12-03, Danish Meteorological Institute.
  7. Berg P, Weismann Poulsen J (2012) Implementation details for HBM. Technical Report 12–11, Danish Meteorological Institute.
  8. Bergström S (1976) Development and application of a conceptual runoff model for Scandinavian catchments. SMHI Reports RHO, No 7, Norrköping Google Scholar
  9. Bergström S (1992) The HBV model—its structure and applications. SMHI Reports RH, No 4, Norrköping Google Scholar
  10. Bi H, Rissik D, Macova M, Hearn L, Mueller JF, Escher B (2011) Recovery of a freshwater wetland from chemical contamination after an oil spill. J Environ Monit 13:713–720 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Børresen JA (1993). Olje på havet (Oil on the sea), Gyldendal Google Scholar
  12. Brandt J, Christensen JH, Frohn LM, Zlatev Z (1998) Numerical modelling of transport, dispersion, and deposition—validation against ETEX-1, ETEX-2 and Chernobyl. Environ Model Softw 15:521–531 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brandt J, Christensen JH, Frohn LM (2002) Modelling transport and deposition of caesium and iodine from the Chernobyl accident using the DREAM model. Atmos Chem Phys 2:397–417 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Broström G, Carrasco A, Hole LR, Dick S, Janssen F, Mattsson J, Berger S (2011) Usefulness of high resolution coastal models for operational oil spill forecast: the Full City accident. Ocean Sci 7:805–820 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burgherr P (2007) In-depth analysis of accidental oil spills from tankers in the context of global spill trends from all sources. J Hazard Mater 140:245–256 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Canuto VM, Howard A, Cheng Y, Dubrovikov MS (2001) Ocean Turbulence. Part I: One-point closure model-momentum and heat vertical diffusivities. J Phys Oceanogr 31:1413–1426 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Canuto VM, Howard A, Cheng Y, Dubrovikov MS (2002) Ocean turbulence. Part II: Vertical diffusivities of momentum, heat, salt, mass and passive scalars. J Phys Oceanogr 32:240–264 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Christensen JH (2002) Application of multivariate data analysis for assessing the early fate of petrogenic compounds in the marine environment following the Baltic Carrier oil spill. Polycycl Aromat Compd 22:703–714 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Christensen OB, Drews M, Christensen JH, Dethloff K, Ketelsen K, Hebestadt I, Rinke A (2006) The HIRHAM Regional Climate Model. Version 5. DMI technical report No 06-17.
  20. Christiansen M, Fagerholt K, Ronen D (2004) Ship routing and scheduling: status and perspectives. Transp Sci 38:1–18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Daling PS, Moldestad MO, Johansen O, Lewis A, Rodal J (2003) Norwegian testing of emulsion properties at sea—the importance of oil type and release conditions. Spill Sci Technol Bull 8:123–136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dalton T, Jin D (2010) Extent and frequency of vessel oil spills in US marine protected areas. Mar Pollut Bull 60:1939–1945 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dean RG, Bender CJ (2006) Static wave setup with emphasis on damping effects by vegetation and bottom friction. Coast Eng 53:149–165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Delpeche-Ellmann NC, Soomere T (2013) Investigating the Marine Protected Areas most at risk of current-driven pollution in the Gulf of Finland, the Baltic Sea, using a Lagrangian transport model. Mar Pollut Bull 67:121–129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dick S, Soetje KC (1990) An operational oil dispersion model for the German Bight, Dtsch Hydrogr Z, Ergänz.heft, Reihe A 16, 43 pp Google Scholar
  26. Dick S, Kleine E, Müller-Navarra S (2001) The operational circulation model of BSH (BSH cmod). Model description and validation. Berichte des Bundesamtes für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie 29/2001. Hamburg, Germany, 48 pp Google Scholar
  27. Dietze H, Kriest I (2012) Cs-137 off Fukushima Dai-ichi, Japan—model based estimates of dilution and fate. Ocean Sci 8:319–332 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dippner JW (1984) Ein Strömungs- und Öldriftmodel für die Deutsche Bucht. Veröff Inst Meeresforsch Bremerhaven, Suppl B8, 188 pp Google Scholar
  29. Drozdowski A, Nudds S, Hannah CG, Niu H, Peterson IK, Perrie WA WA (2011) Review of oil spill trajectory modelling in the presence of ice. Canadian Technical Report of Hydrography and Ocean Sciences 274. Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 84 pp.
  30. Edgell N (1994) The Braer tanker incident—some lessons from the Shetland Islands. Mar Pollut Bull 29:361–367 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Evans JJ, Marlow P (1990) Quantitative methods in maritime economics, 2nd ed. Fairplay Publications, Coulsdon Google Scholar
  32. Fay JA (1969) The spread of oil slicks on a calm sea. In: Hoult DP (ed) Oil on the sea, pp 53–63 Google Scholar
  33. Fay JA (1971) Physical processes in the spread of oil on a water surface. In: Proceedings of joint conference on prevention and control of oil spills, USA, Washington, DC, June 15–17, pp 463–467 Google Scholar
  34. Fingas MF (ed) (2011) Oil spill science and technology. Prevention, response and cleanup. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1156 pp Google Scholar
  35. Forrester WD (1971) Distribution of suspended oil particles following the grounding of the tanker Arrow. J Mar Res 29:151–170 Google Scholar
  36. Funkquist L (2001) HIROMB: an operational eddy-resolving model for the Baltic Sea. Bull Mar Inst Gdańsk 28:7–16 Google Scholar
  37. Hela I (1952) Drift currents and permanent flow. Commentationes physico-mathematicae, vol XVI. Societas Scientarium Fennica, Helsinki, 14, 27 pp Google Scholar
  38. Hibler WD III (1979) A dynamic thermodynamic sea ice model. J Phys Oceanogr 9:817–846 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Höglund A, Meier HEM (2012) Environmentally safe areas and routes in the Baltic Proper using Eulerian tracers. Mar Pollut Bull 64:1375–1385 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Janeiro J, Martins F, Relvas P (2012) Towards the development of an operational tool for oil spills management in the Algarve coast. J Coast Conserv 16:449–460 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jerneloev A (2010) The threats from oil spills: now, then, and in the future. Ambio 39:353–366 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Johansen Ø (1982) Drift of submerged oil at sea. Continental Shelf Institute Report P 319/1 Trondheim, 51 pp Google Scholar
  43. Johansen Ø et al (2005) Simulations of oil drift and spreading and oil spill response analysis. Arctic Operational Platform project (ARCOP) Google Scholar
  44. Kleine E (1994) Das operationelle Modell des BSH für Nordsee und Ostsee, Konzeption und Übersicht. Bundesamt für Seeschifffart und Hydrographie, 126 pp (in German) Google Scholar
  45. Keramitsoglou I, Cartalis C, Kassomenos P (2003) Decision support system for managing oil spill events. Environ Manag 32:290–298 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kjelsson J, Döös K (2012) Surface drifters and model trajectories in the Baltic Sea. Boreal Environ Res 17:447–459 Google Scholar
  47. Larsen J, Høyer JL, She J (2007) Validation of a hybrid optimal interpolation and Kalman filter scheme of sea surface temperature assimilation. J Mar Syst 65:122–133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Leibovich S (1975) A natural limit to the containment and removal of oil spills at sea. Ocean Eng 3:29–36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Leppäranta M (2010) The drift of sea ice. Springer Praxis, Berlin, 266 pp Google Scholar
  50. Liu Y, Zhu J, She J, Zhuang S, Fu W, Gao J (2009) Assimilating temperature and salinity profile observations using an anisotropic recursive filter in a coastal ocean model. Ocean Model 30:75–87 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lo HK, McCord MR (1995) Routing through dynamic ocean currents—general heuristics and empirical results in the Gulf-stream region. Transp Res, Part B, Methodol 29:109–124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lo HK, McCord MR (1998) Adaptive ship routing through stochastic ocean currents: general formulations and empirical results. Transp Res, Part A, Policy Pract 32:547–561 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Longuet-Higgins MS, Stewart RW (1964) Radiation stresses in water waves: a physical discussion with applications. Deep-Sea Res 11:529–562 Google Scholar
  54. Lu X, Soomere T, Stanev EV, Murawski J (2012) Identification of the environmentally safe fairway in the South-Western Baltic Sea and Kattegat. Ocean Dyn 62:815–829 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McCord MR, Lee YK, Lo HK (1999) Ship routing through altimetry-derived ocean currents. Transp Sci 33:49–67 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mackay D, Shiu WY, Hossain K, Stiver W, McCurdy D (1982) Development and calibration of an oil spill behavior model. Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, Toronto University (Ontario), 94 pp Google Scholar
  57. Mackay D, Stiver W, Tebeau PA (1983) Testing of crude oils and petroleum products for environmental purposes. In: Proceedings of the 1983 oil spill conference, pp 331–337 Google Scholar
  58. Meier HEM (2001) On the parameterization of mixing in three-dimensional Baltic Sea models. J Geophys Res—Oceans 106:30,997–31,016 Google Scholar
  59. Mellor G (2003) The three-dimensional current and surface wave equations. J Phys Oceanogr 33:1978–1989 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Midboe F, Persson H (2004) Oljeutsläpp och dess miljökonsekvens i Östersjön, Institute of Geosciences, Uppsala University Google Scholar
  61. Molinero CM, Mitsis SN (1984) Budgeting fuel consumption in a cruise liner. Eur J Oper Res 18:172–183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Monson DH, Doak DF, Ballachey BE, Bodkin JL (2011) Could residual oil from the Exxon Valdez spill create a long-term population “sink” for sea otters in Alaska? Ecol Appl 21:2917–2932 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pahlke H (1985) Physikalische Grundlagen der mechanischen Ölbehandlung. Teil 3: Verhalten von Öllachen auf Wasser, Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministers des Inneren. Forschungsbericht 10203 204/01, 185 pp (in German) Google Scholar
  64. Pikkarainen A-L, Lemponen P (2005) Petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in Baltic Sea subsurface water. Boreal Environ Res 10:125–134 Google Scholar
  65. Pålsson J (2012) Oil spill preparedness in the Baltic Sea countries. Report written for the Baltic Master II project, World Maritime University Google Scholar
  66. Reed M, Aamo OM (1994) Real time oil spill forecasting during an experimental oil spill in the Arctic ice. Spill SciTechnol Bull 5:203–209 Google Scholar
  67. Reed M, Johansen O, Brandvik PJ, Daling P, Lewis A, Fiocco R, Mackay D, Prentki R (1999) Oil spill modeling towards the close of the 20th century: overview of the state of the art. Spill Sci Technol Bull 5:3–16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ronen D (1982) The effect of oil price in the optimal speed of ships. J Oper Res Soc 33:1035–1040 Google Scholar
  69. Ronen D (1986) Short term scheduling of vessels for shipping bulk or semi-bulk commodities originating in a single area. Oper Res 34:164–173 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. She J, Berg P, Berg J (2007) Bathymetry impacts on water exchange modelling through the Danish Straits. J Mar Syst 65:450–459 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Seifert T, Tauber F, Kayser B (2001) A high resolution spherical grid topography of the Baltic Sea, 2nd edition. In: Baltic Sea science congress, Stockholm, 25–29 November 2001, Poster #147. Google Scholar
  72. Smagorinsky J (1963) General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic experiment. Mon Weather Rev 91:99–164 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Soomere T, Quak E (2007) On the potential of reducing coastal pollution by a proper choice of the fairway. J Coast Res 50(Special Issue):678–682 Google Scholar
  74. Soomere T, Myrberg K, Leppäranta M, Nekrasov A (2008) The progress in knowledge of physical oceanography of the Gulf of Finland: a review for 1997–2007. Oceanologia 50:287–362 Google Scholar
  75. Soomere T, Viikmäe B, Delpeche N, Myrberg K (2010) Towards identification of areas of reduced risk in the Gulf of Finland, the Baltic Sea. Proc Est Acad Sci 59:156–165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Soomere T, Andrejev O, Sokolov A, Myrberg K (2011a) The use of Lagrangian trajectories for identification the environmentally safe fairway. Mar Pollut Bull 62:1410–1420 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Soomere T, Andrejev O, Sokolov A, Quak E (2011b) Management of coastal pollution by means of smart placement of human activities. J Coast Res 64(Special Issue):951–955 Google Scholar
  78. Soomere T, Berezovski M, Quak E, Viikmäe B (2011c) Modeling environmentally friendly fairways in elongated basins using Lagrangian trajectories: a case study for the Gulf of Finland, the Baltic Sea. Ocean Dyn 61:1669–1680 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Soomere T, Delpeche N, Viikmäe B, Quak E, Meier HEM, Döös K (2011d) Patterns of current-induced transport in the surface layer of the Gulf of Finland. Boreal Environ Res 16(Suppl A):49–63 Google Scholar
  80. Sørensen JH (1998) Sensitivity of the DERMA long-range Gaussian dispersion model to meteorological input and diffusion parameters. Atmos Environ 32:4195–4206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sørensen JH, Baklanov A, Hoe S (2007) The Danish emergency response model of the atmosphere (DERMA). J Environ Radioact 96:122–129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Stokstad E (2009) US poised to adopt national ocean policy. Science 326:1618 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Suursaar Ü, Kullas K, Otsmann M, Saaremäe I, Kuik J, Merilain M (2006) Hurricane Gudrun and modelling its hydrodynamic consequences in the Estonian coastal waters. Boreal Environ Res 11:143–159 Google Scholar
  84. Sverdrup HU, Johnson MW, Fleming RH (1942) The oceans. Prentice-Hall, New York Google Scholar
  85. Umlauf L, Burchard H, Hutter K (2003) Extending the kω turbulence model towards oceanic applications. Ocean Model 5:195–218 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Vandenbulcke L, Beckers J-M, Lenartz F, Barth A, Poulain P-M, Aidonidis M, Meyrat J, Ardhuin F, Tonani M, Fratianni C, Torrisi L, Pallela D, Chiggiato J, Tudor M, Book JW, Martin P, Peggion G, Rixen M (2009) Super-ensemble techniques: application to surface drift prediction. Prog Oceanogr 82:149–167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Viikmäe B, Soomere T, Viidebaum M, Berezovski A (2010) Temporal scales for transport patterns in the Gulf of Finland. Est J Eng 16:211–227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Yapa PD, Belaskas DP (1993) Radial spreading of oil under and over broken ice—an experimental-study. Can J Civ Eng 20:910–922 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wang K, Leppäranta M, Gästgifvars M, Vainio J, Wang C (2008) The drift and spreading of the Runner 4 oil spill and the ice conditions in the Gulf of Finland, winter, 2006. Est J Earth Sci 57:181–191 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Webster HN, Thomson DJ, Johnson BT, Heard IPC, Turnbull K, Marenco F, Kristiansen NI, Dorsey J, Minikin A, Weinzierl B, Schumann U, Sparks RSJ, Loughlin SC, Hort MC, Leadbetter SJ, Devenish BJ, Manning AJ, Witham CS, Haywood JM, Golding BW (2012) Operational prediction of ash concentrations in the distal volcanic cloud from the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption. J Geophys Res—Atmos 117:D00U08 Google Scholar
  91. Weismann Poulsen J, Berg P (2012) More details on HBM—general modelling theory and survey of recent studies. Technical Report 12-16, Danish Meteorological Institute.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Danish Meteorological InstituteCopenhagen EDenmark

Personalised recommendations