Advertisement

Lifestyle Segmentation Based on Contents of Uploaded Images Versus Ratings of Items

  • Ines DanielEmail author
  • Daniel Baier
Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization book series (STUDIES CLASS)

Abstract

Clustering algorithms are standard tools for marketing purposes. So, e.g., in market segmentation, they are applied to derive homogeneous customer groups. However, recently, the available resources for this purpose have extended. So, e.g., in social networks potential customers provide images which reflect their activities, interests, and opinions. To compare whether contents of uploaded images lead to similar lifestyle segmentations as ratings of items, a comparison study was conducted among 478 people. In this paper we discuss the results of this study that suggests that similar lifestyle segmentations can be found. We discuss advantages and disadvantages of the new approach to lifestyle segmentation.

Keywords

Hierarchical Cluster Analysis Feature Extraction Method Content Base Image Retrieval Enduring Belief Lifestyle Statement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by Federal Ministry for Education and Research under grants 03FO3072. The author is responsible for the content of this paper.

References

  1. Ahmad, N., Omar, A., & Ramayah, T. (2010). Consumer lifestyles and online shopping continuance intention. Business Strategy Series, 11(4), 227–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baier, D., & Daniel, I. (2012). Image clustering for marketing purposes. In W. Gaul, A. Geyer-Schulz, & L. Schmidt-Thieme (Eds.), Challenges at the interface of data analysis, computer science, and optimization (pp. 487–494). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bearden, W. O., Netemeyer, R. G., & Teel, J. E. (1989). Measurement of consumer susceptibility influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 473–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boejgaard, J., & Ellegaard, C. (2010). Unfolding implementation in industrial market segmentation. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(8), 1291–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daniel, I., & Baier, D. (2012). Image clustering algorithms and the usage of images for marketing purposes. In J. Pociecha & R. Decker (Eds.), Data analysis methods and its applications (pp. 171–181). Warschau: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
  6. Goller, S., Hogg, A., & Kalafatis, S. P. (2002). A new research agenda for business segmentation. European Journal of Marketing, 36(1/2), 252–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gonzalez, A. M., & Bello, L. (2002). The construct lifestyle in market segmentation – the behavior of tourist consumers. European Journal of Marketing, 36, 51–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Homburg, Ch., & Giering, A. (1996). Konzeptualisierung und Operationalisierung komplexer Konstrukte – Ein Leitfaden fuer die Marketingforschung. Marketing Zeitschrift fuer Forschung und Praxis, 18(1), 5–24.Google Scholar
  9. Lazer, W. (1964). Life style concepts and marketing. In A. Greyser (Ed.) Toward scientific marketing (pp. 130–139). Chicago: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar
  10. Lee, H. -J., Lim, H., Jolly, L. D., & Lee, J. (2009). Consumer lifestyles and adoption of high-technology products: a case of South Korea. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 21(2), 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  12. Plummer, J. T. (1974). The concept and application of life style segmentation. The Journal of Marketing, 38(1), 33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values (1st ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  14. Rubner, Y., & Tomasi, C. (2001). Perceptual metrics for image database navigation. Boston: Kluwer.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Simmel, G. (1900). Philosophie des Geldes (1st ed.). Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar
  16. Sinus-Institut Heidelberg (2011). Informationen zu den Sinus-Milieus 2011, http://www.sinus-institut.de/uploads/tx_mpdownloadcenter/Informationen_Sinus-Milieus_042011.pdf (checked on March 11, 2013).
  17. Smith, W. (1956). Product differentiation and market segmentation as alternative marketing strategies. The Journal of Marketing, 21, 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Weber, M. (1922). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (1st ed.). Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (P. Siebeck).Google Scholar
  19. Wedel, M., & Kamakura, W. A. (2000). Market segmentation: conceptual and methodological foundations [International series in Quantitative marketing] (2nd ed.). Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  20. Wells, W. D., & Tigert, D. (1971). Activities, interests and opinions. Journal of Advertising Research, 11, 27–35.Google Scholar
  21. Wyszecki, G., & Stiles, W. (2000). Color science. Concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulae (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Business Administration and EconomicsBrandenburg University of Technology CottbusCottbusGermany

Personalised recommendations