Advertisement

A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of the Black-Litterman Model

  • Wolfgang BesslerEmail author
  • Dominik Wolff
Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization book series (STUDIES CLASS)

Abstract

The Black-Litterman (BL) model aims to enhance asset allocation decisions by overcoming the weaknesses of standard mean-variance (MV) portfolio optimization. In this study we propose a method that enables the implementation of the BL model on a multi-asset portfolio allocation decision. Further, we empirically test the out-of-sample portfolio performance of BL optimized portfolios in comparison to mean-variance (MV), minimum-variance, and adequate benchmark portfolios. Using an investment universe of global stock markets, bonds, and commodities, we find that for the period from January 2000 to August 2011 out-of-sample BL optimized portfolios provide superior Sharpe ratios, even after controlling for different levels of risk aversion, realistic investment constraints, and transaction costs. Further the BL approach is suitable to alleviate most of the shortcomings of MV optimization, in that the resulting portfolios are more diversified, less extreme, and hence, economically more intuitive.

Keywords

Sharpe Ratio Asset Class Portfolio Weight Return Estimate Portfolio Allocation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Best, M. J., & Grauer, R. R. (1991). On the sensitivity of mean-variance-efficient portfolios to changes in asset means: Some analytical and computational results. Review of Financial Studies, 4(2), 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Black, F., & Litterman, R. (1992). Global portfolio optimization. Financial Analysts Journal, 48(5), 28–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Broadie, M. (1993). Computing efficient frontiers using estimated parameters. Annals of Operations Research, 45, 21–58.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chopra, V. K., & Ziemba, W. T. (1993). The effect of errors in means, variances, and covariances on optimal portfolio choice. Journal of Portfolio Management, 19(2), 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., & Uppal, R. (2009). Optimal versus naive diversification: How inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy? Review of Financial Studies, 22, 1915–1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Drobetz, W. (2003). Einsatz des Black-Litterman-Verfahrens in der Asset Allocation. In H. Dichtl, J. M. Kleeberg, & C. Schlenger (Eds.), Handbuch Asset Allocation: Innovative Konzepte zur systematischen Portfolioplanung, Bad Soden, Germany: Uhlenbruch, 211–239.Google Scholar
  7. Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.Google Scholar
  8. Michaud, R. O. (1989). The Markowitz optimization enigma: Is the optimized optimal? Financial Analysts Journal, 45(1), 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Opdyke, J. D. (2007). Comparing Sharpe ratios: So where are the p-values? Journal of Asset Management, 8(5), 308–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Finance and BankingUniversity of GiessenGiessenGermany

Personalised recommendations