Approximate Commutative Algebra pp 193-203

Part of the Texts and Monographs in Symbolic Computation book series (TEXTSMONOGR)

An Introduction to Regression and Errors in Variables from an Algebraic Viewpoint



There is a need to make a closer connection between classical response surface methods and their experimental design aspects, including optimal design, and algebraic statistics, based on computational algebraic geometry of ideals of points. This is a programme which was initiated by Pistone and Wynn (Biometrika, 1996) and is expanding rapidly. Particular attention is paid to the problem of errors in variables which can be taken as a statistical version of the ApCoA research programme.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Berkson, J. (1950). Are there two regressions? J. Amer. Statist. Assoc, 45, 164–180.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dobson, A. J.(2002). An introduction to generalized linear models. Second edition. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Donev, A.N. (2000). Dealing with errors in variables in regression surface exploration. Commun. Statist. Theory Methods, 29, 2065–2077.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Donev, A. N. (2004). Design of experiments in the presence of errors in factor levels. J. Statist. Plann. Inference, 33, 569–585.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Durbin, J. Errors in variables. (1954). Rev. Inst. Internat. Statist. 22, 23–32.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Giglio, B., Riccomagno, E and Wynn, H. P. (2000). Gröbner basis strategies in regression. Journal of Applied Statistics, 27, 923–938.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fuller, W. A. (1987). Measurement error models. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics: Probability and Mathematical Statistics. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kendall, M. G. (1952). Regression, structure and functional relationship. II. Biometrika, 39, 96–108.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laubenbacher, R. and Stigler, B. (2008). Design of experiments and biochemical network inference. In Geometric and Algebraic Methods in Statistics (eds. P. Gibilisco, E. Riccomagno, M.P. Rogantin and H.P. Wynn), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bühlmann, P. (2008). High-dimensional variable selection: from association to intervention. In Proceedings of the 7th World Congress in Probability and Statistics, Singapore July 14-19, 2008, 80-81.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nummi, T. and Möttönen, J. (2004). Estimation and prediction for low degree polynomial models under measurement errors with an application to forest harvesters. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. C, 53, 495–505.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pearl, J. (2000). Causality. Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.MATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pistone, G., Riccomagno, E. and Wynn, H. P. (2001). Algebraic Statistics. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pistone, G. and Wynn, H. P. (1996). Generalised confounding with Gröbner bases. Biometrika 83:3, 653–666.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ruffa, S. (2004). La statistica algebrica nei modelli di regression con errori nelle variabili (in Italian), Laurea Specialistica, Politecnico di Torino.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Searle, S. R. (1987). Linear models for unbalanced data, John Wiley Sons.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Vienna 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di MatematicaGenovaItaly
  2. 2.Department of StatisticsLondon School of EconomicsLondonUK

Personalised recommendations