Biomechanical modeling of decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury

  • Chun Ping Gao
  • Beng Ti Ang
Conference paper
Part of the Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum book series (NEUROCHIRURGICA, volume 102)

Background Decompressive craniectomy is the final phase in the graded scheme of critical care management of refractory raised intracranial pressure following severe traumatic brain injury. We aim to define the optimal size for decompressive craniectomy so that a good balance is achieved between reduction of raised ICP and the extent of trans-calvarial herniation. Provision of such quantitative data will also allow for improved data comparison in clinical trials addressing the surgical management of severe head injury.

Methods In this study, we utilize a finite element mesh model and focus on the effect of size of both unilateral and bifrontal decompressive craniectomy on intracranial pressure and brain herniation.

Findings The finite element mesh model is able to effect modeling of brain deformation and intracranial pressure changes following both unilateral fronto-parietal-temporal and bifrontal decompressive craniectomy.

Conclusions Finite element mesh modeling in the scenario of reafractory raised intracranial pressure following severe head injury may be able to guide the optimal conduct of decompressive surgery so as to effect a reduction in intracranial pressure whilst minimizing trans-calvarial brain herniation.


Decompressive craniectomy Intracranial pressure Finite element Herniation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Cheng S, Bilston LE (2007) Unconfined compression of white matter. J Biomech 40:117–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dumpuri P, Thompson RC, Dawant BM, Cao A, Miga MI (2007) An atlas-based method to compensate for brain shift: preliminary results. Med Image Anal 11:128–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gao C, Tay FEH, Nowinski WL (2004) Constructing a detailed finite element brain model for neurosurgery simulation based on a brain atlas. Acta Press, Anaheim, CA, United States Marbella, Spain, pp 937–942Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kyriacou SK, Mohamed A, Miller K, Neff S (2002) Brain mechanics for neurosurgery: modeling issues. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 1:151–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mendis KK, Stalnaker RL, Advani SH (1995) A constitutive relationship for large deformation finite element modeling of brain tissue. J Biomech Eng 117:279–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miga MI, Paulsen KD, Hoopes PJ, Kennedy FE, Hartov A, Roberts DW (2000) In vivo modeling of interstitial pressure in the brain under surgical load using finite elements. J Biomech Eng 122:354–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Miga MI, Paulsen KD, Lemery JM, Eisner SD, Hartov A, Kennedy FE, Roberts DW (1999) Model-updated image guidance: initial clinical experiences with gravity-induced brain deformation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18:866–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reulen HJ, Graham R, Spatz M, Klatzo I (1977) Role of pressure gradients and bulk flow in dynamics of vasogenic brain edema. J Neurosurg 46:24–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chun Ping Gao
    • 1
  • Beng Ti Ang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryNational Neuroscience InstituteTan Tock SengSingapore

Personalised recommendations