The Strength of Nonstandard Analysis pp 227-237 | Cite as
A Radon-Nikodým theorem for a vector-valued reference measure
Abstract
The conclusion of a Radon-Nikodým theorem is that a measure μ can be represented as an integral with respect to a reference measure such that for all measurable sets A, μ(A) = ∫A f μ(x)dλ with a (Bochner or Lebesgue) integrable derivative or density f μ. The measure λ is usually a countably additive σ-finite measure on the given measure space and the measure μ is absolutely continuous with respect to λ. Different theorems have different range spaces for μ. which could be the real numbers, or Banach spaces with or without the Radon-Nikodým property. In this paper we generalize to derivatives of vector valued measures with respect a vector-valued reference measure. We present a Radon-Nikodým theorem for vector measures of bounded variation that are absolutely continuous with respect to another vector measure of bounded variation. While it is easy in settings such as μ << λ, where λ is Lebesgue measure on the interval [0,1] and μ is vector-valued to write down a nonstandard Radon-Nikodým derivative of the form ϕ : *[0,1] → fin(*E) by \( \varphi _\mu (x) = \sum\nolimits_{i = 1}^H {\tfrac{{{}^*\mu (A_i )}} {{{}^*\lambda (A_i )}}1_{A_i } (x)} \) a vector valued reference measure does not allow this approach, as the quotient of two vectors in different Banach spaces is undefined. Furthermore, generalizing to a vector valued control measure necessitates the use of a generalization of the Bartle integral, a bilinear vector integral.
Keywords
Banach Space Bounded Variation Vector Measure Generalize Derivative Nonstandard AnalysisPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]S. Albeverio, J.E. Fenstad, R. Høegh-Krohn and T. Lindstrøm, Nonstandard methods in stochastic analysis and mathematical physics, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1986.MATHGoogle Scholar
- [2]R.G. Bartle, “A general bilinear vector integral”, Studia Math., 15 (1956) 337–352.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [3]J. Bliedtner and P.A. Loeb, “The Optimal Differentiation Basis and Liftings of L ∞”. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 352 (2000) 4693–4710.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [4]W.M. Bogdanovicz and B. Kritt, “Radon-Nikodým Differentiation of one Vector-Valued Volume with Respect to Another”. Bulletin De L’Academie Polonaise Des Sciences, Série des sciences math. astr. et phys., XV (1967) 479–486.Google Scholar
- [5]J. Diestel and J.J. Uhl, Vector Measures, Mathematical Surveys 15, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1977.MATHGoogle Scholar
- [6]C.W. Henson and L.C. Moore, Nonstandard Analysis and the theory of Banach spaces, in A.E. Hurd (ed.) Nonstandard Analysis—Recent Developments, Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics 983, 1983.Google Scholar
- [7]A.E. Hurd and P.A. Loeb. An Introduction to Nonstandard Real Analysis, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, 1985.MATHGoogle Scholar
- [8]P.A. Loeb, “Conversion from nonstandard to standard measure spaces and applications to probability theory”, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 211 (1975) 113–122.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [9]D. A. Ross, Nonstandard Measure Constructions — Solutions and Problems submitted to NS2002, Nonstandard Methods and Applications in Mathematics, June 10–16 2002. Pisa, Italy.Google Scholar
- [10]G.B. Zimmer, “An extension of the Bochner integral generalizing the Loeb-Osswald integral”, Proc. Cambr. Phil. Soc., 123 (1998) 119–131.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [11]G.B. Zimmer, “A unifying Radon-Nikodým Theorem through Nonstandard Hulls”, Illinois Journal of Mathematics, 49, (2005) 873–883.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [12]G.B. Zimmer, Nonstandard Vector Integrals and Vector Measures, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, October 1994.Google Scholar
- [13]R. T. Živaljević, “Loeb completion of internal vector-valued measures”, Math. Scand., 56 (1985) 276–286.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar