Oxidative Stress and Neuroprotection pp 17-25
Changing dopamine agonist treatment in Parkinson’s disease: experiences with switching to pramipexole
1202 patients suffering from Parkinson’s disease switched from other dopamine agonists to pramipexole under open conditions either abruptly or in an overlapping, gradual manner. Mostly insufficient effectiveness motivated the switch. The investigators gave equal preference to either an abrupt or an overlapping switch to pramipexole in this observational study. There was a tendency in favour of the overlapping switch procedure in those patients who were on a relatively higher dose of a dopamine agonist before the switch. The switch was performed because the investigators expected the effect of pramipexole on tremor, motor functions and depression/anhedonia to be better compared with previous dopamine agonists. The main reasons for switching to pramipexole (anti-tremor effect, anti-depressive/anti-anhedonic effect) as given by the physicians at baseline came up to expectations.
The switch to pramipexole mostly yielded further improvements irrespective of the mode of switching.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2003) Diagnosis and Treatment of Parkinson’s Disease: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: Number 57. AHRQ Publication Number 03-E039. Rockville, MDGoogle Scholar
- Brecht HM (2001) Dopaminagonisten im Vergleich. In: Riederer P, Laux G, Pöldinger W (eds) Neuro-Psychopharmaka 5: 226–237Google Scholar
- German Society of Neurology (2003) Leitlinien für Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie; 2. revised and enlarged edition, Thieme, Stuttgart, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Kraus P, Hoffmann A (2006) (in preparation) Spiralometry: A new technique for a computer based evaluation of paper-pencil spiralsGoogle Scholar
- Pogarell O, Gasser T, Van Hilten JJ, Spieker S, Pollentier S, Meier D, Oertel WH (2002) Pramipexole in patientswith Parkinson’s disease and marked drug resistant tremor: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled multicentre study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 72: 713–720PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rabey JM, Bass H, Bonucelli U, Brooks D, Klotz P, Korczyn AD, Kraus P, Martinez-Martin P, Morrish P, van Sauten W, van Hilten B (1997) Evaluation of the short Parkinson’s Evaluation Scale: a new friendly scale for the evaluation of Parkinson’s disease in clinical drug trials. Clin Neuropharmacol 20: 322–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Reichmann H, Sommer U, Fuchs G, Hefter H, Mark G, Muller T, Thumler R, Ulm G, Vieregge P (2000) Workshop IV: drug treatment guidelines for the long-term management of parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 247[Suppl 4]: 40–41Google Scholar
- Rektorova I, Rektor I, Bares M, Dostál V, Ehler E, Fanfrdiovà Z, Fiedler J, Klaiblova H, Kulisták P, Ressner P, Svátová J, Urbánek K, Velísková J (2003) Depression in Parkinson’s disease: an eight-month, randomised, open-label, national multi-centre comparative study of pramipexole and pergolide. Eur J Neurol 10: 399–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tetrud JW, Zhang J, Gomez-Mancilla B, Greenfield JC (2000) Abrupt conversion of Parkinson’s disease patients to pramipexole from bromocriptine or pergolide: Safety, tolerance, and optimal conversion ratio. Neurology 54[Suppl 3]: 279–280Google Scholar