Regional Variation of Lg Coda Q in the Continental United States and its Relation to Crustal Structure and Evolution

  • Saadia Baqer
  • B. J. Mitchell
Chapter
Part of the Pageoph Topical Volumes book series (PTV)

Abstract

Records from broadband digital stations have allowed us to map regional variations of Lg coda Q across almost the entire United States. Using a stacked ratio method we obtained estimates of Q 0 (Lg coda Q at 1 Hz) and its frequency dependence, η, for 218 event-station pairs. Those sets of estimates were inverted using a back-projection method to obtain tomographic images showing regional variations of Q 0 and η. Q 0 is lowest (250–300) in the California coastal regions and the western part of the Basin and Range province, and highest (650–750) in the northern Appalachians and a portion of the Central Lowlands. Intermediate values occur in the Colorado Plateau (300–500), the Columbia Plateau (300–400), the Rocky Mountains (450–550), the Great Plains (500–650), the Gulf Coastal Plain and the southern portion of Atlantic Coastal Plain (400–500), and the portions of the Central Lowlands surrounding the high-Q region (500–550). The pattern of Q 0 variations suggests that the United States can be divided into two large Q provinces. One province spans the area from the Rocky Mountains to the Atlantic coast, is technically stable, and exhibits relatively high Q 0. The other extends westward from the approximate western margin of the Rocky Mountains to the Pacific coast, is tectonically active, and exhibits low Q 0. The transition from high to low Lg coda Q in the western United States lies further to the west than does an upper mantle transition for Q and electrical resistivity found in earlier studies. The difference in Q 0 between the western and eastern United States can be attributed to a greater amount of interstitial crustal fluids in the west. Regions of moderately reduced Q within the stable platform often occur where there are accumulations of Mesozoic and younger sediments. Reduced Q 0 in the southeastern United States may not be due to anelasticity but may rather be explained by a gradational velocity increase at the crust-mantle boundary that causes shear energy to leak into the mantle.

Key words

Lg Lg coda Q United States crust crustal evolution 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alsina, D., Woodward, R. L., and Snieder, R. K. (1996), Shear Wave Velocity Structure in North America from Large-scale Waveform Inversions of Surface Waves, J. Geophys. Res. 101, 15969–15986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. E., Tectonic evolution of the Intermontane system; Basin and Range, Colorado Plateau, and High Lava Plains. In Geophysical Framework of the Continental United States, Mem. 172 (ed’s. Pakiser, L. C, and Mooney, W. D.) (Geol. Soc. Am., Boulder, Colorado)Google Scholar
  3. Benz, H. M., Frank, A., pp. 163–176. and Boore, D. M. (1997), Regional Lg Attenuation for Continental United States, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 87, 606–619.Google Scholar
  4. Bowman, J. R., and Kennett, B. L. N. (1991), Propagation of Lg Waves in the North Australian Craton: Influence of Crustal Velocity Gradients, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 81, 592–610.Google Scholar
  5. Braile L. W., Hinze, W. J., von Frese, R. R. B., and Keller, G. R. Seismic properties of the crust and uppermost mantle of the conterminous United States and adjacent Canada. In Geophysical Framework of the Continental United States, Mem. 172 (eds. Pakiser, L. C, and Mooney, W. D.) (Geol. Soc. Am., Boulder, Colorado 1989) pp. 655–680.Google Scholar
  6. Chávez, D. E., and Priestley, D. E. (1986), Measurement of Frequency Dependent Lg Attenuation in the Great Basin, Geophys. Res. Lett. 13, 551–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng, C. C., and Mitchell, B. J. (1981), Crustal Q Structure in the United States from Multi-mode Surface Waves, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 71, 161–181.Google Scholar
  8. Cong, L., and Mitchell, B. J. (1998), Lg Coda Q and its Relation to the Geology and Tectonics of the Middle East, Pure and appl. geophys. 153, 563–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Der, Z. A., Masse, R. P., and Gurski, J. P. (1975), Regional Attenuation of Short-period P and S Waves in the United States, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 40, 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Der Z. A., Marshall, M. E., O’Donnell, A., and McElfresh, T. W. (1984), Spatial Coherence Structure and Attenuation of the Lg Phase, Site Effects, and the Interpretation of the Lg Coda, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 74, 1125–1147.Google Scholar
  11. Herrin, E., and Taggart, J. (1962), Regional Variations in Pn Velocity and their Effect’s on the Location of Epicenters, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 52, 1037–1046.Google Scholar
  12. Kane, M. F., and Godson, R. H. (1989), A crust/mantle structural framework of the conterminous United States based on gravity and magnetic trends. In Geophysical Framework of the Continental United States, Mem. 172 (eds. Pakiser, L. C, and Mooney, W. D.) (Geol. Soc. Am., Boulder, Colorado 1989) pp. 383–403.Google Scholar
  13. Keller, G. V. (1989), Electrical structure of the crust and upper mantle beneath the United States; Part 2, Survey of data and interpretation. In Geophysical Framework of the Continental United States, Mem. 172 (ed’s. Pakiser, L. C, and Mooney, W. D.) (Geol. Soc. Am., Boulder, Colorado 1989) pp. 425–446.Google Scholar
  14. McBirney, A. R. (1978), Volcanic Evolution of the Cascade Range, Earth and Planetary Sciences Ann. Rev. 6, 437–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Miller, E. L. Miller, M. M., Stevens, C. H., Wright, J. E., and Madrid, R., Late Paleozoic paleogeographic and tectonic evolution of the western U.S. Cordillera. In The Cordilleran Orogen: Conterminous U.S., The Geology of North America, G-3 (eds. Burchfiel, B. C, Lipman, P. W., and Zoback, M. L.) (Geol. Soc. Am., Boulder, Colorado 1992) pp. 57–106.Google Scholar
  16. Mitchell, B. J. (1975), Regional Rayleigh Wave Attenuation in North America, J. Geophys. Res. 80, 4904–4916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mitchell, B. J. (1995), Anelastic Structure and Evolution of the Continental Crust and Upper Mantle from Seismic Surface Wave Attenuation, Rev. Geophys. 33, 441–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mitchell, B. J. (1997), Lg Coda Q Variation across Eurasia and its Relation to Crustal Evolution, J. Geophys. Res. 102, 22767–22779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mitchell B. J., and Hwang, H. J. (1987), Effect of Low Q Sediments and Crustal Q and Lg Attenuation in the United States, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 77, 1197–1210.Google Scholar
  20. Mitchell, B. J., and Xie, J. (1994), Attenuation of Multiphase Surface Waves in the Basin and Range Province—Part III, Inversion for Crustal Anelasticity, Geophys. J. Int. 116, 468–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mooney, W. D., and Weaver, S. C. (1989), Regional crustal structure and tectonics of the Pacific coastal states; California, Oregon, and Washington. In Geophysical Framework of the Continental United States, Mem. 172 (ed’s. Pakiser, L. C, and Mooney, W. D.) (Geol. Soc. Am., Boulder, Colorado 1989) pp. 129–161.Google Scholar
  22. Morgan, P., and Gosnold, W. D. (1989), Heat flow and thermal regimes in the continental United States. In Geophysical Framework of the Continental United States, Mem. 172 (eds Pakiser, L. C, and Mooney, W. D.) (Geol. Soc. Am., Boulder, Colorado 1989) pp. 493–522.Google Scholar
  23. Nuttli, O. W. (1988), Lg Magnitudes and Yield Estimates for Underground Novaya Zemlya Nuclear Explosions, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 78, 873–884.Google Scholar
  24. Owens, T. J. Taylor, S. R., and Zandt, G. (1987), Crustal Structure at Regional Seismic Test Network Stations Determined from Inversion of Broadband Teleseismic P Waveforms, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 77, 631–662.Google Scholar
  25. Porath, H. (1971), Magnetic Variation Anomalies and Seismic Low-velocity Zone in the Western United States, J. Geophys. Res. 76, 2643–2648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Prodehl, C, and Lipman, W. P. (1989), Crustal structure of the Rocky Mountain region. In Geophysical Framework of the Continental United States, Mem. 172 (eds. Pakiser, L. C, and Mooney, W. D.) (Geol. Soc. Am., Boulder, Colorado 1989) pp. 249–284.Google Scholar
  27. Saleeby, J. C., Ocean floor accretion and volcano-plutonic arc evolution of the Mesozoic Sierra Nevada, California. In The Geotectonic Development of California (ed. Ernst, W. G.) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 1981) pp. 130–181.Google Scholar
  28. Shi, J., Kim, W., and Richards, P. G. (1996), Variability of Crustal Attenuation in the Northeastern United States from Lg Waves, J. Geophys. Res. 101, 25231–25242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Singh, S. K., and Herrmann, R. B. (1983), Regionalization of Crustal Coda Q in the Continental United States, J. Geophys. Res. 88, 527–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Solomon, S. C, and Toksöz, M. N. (1970), Lateral Variation of Attenuation of P and S Waves beneath the United States, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 60, 819–838.Google Scholar
  31. Sutton, G. H., Mitronovas, W., and Pomeroy, P. W. (1967), Short-period Seismic Energy Radiation Patterns from Underground Nuclear Explosions and Small-magnitude Earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 57, 249–267.Google Scholar
  32. Wyllie, P. J. (1988), Magma Genesis, Plate Tectonics, and Chemical Differentiation of the Earth, Rev. Geophys. 26, 370–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xie, J., and Nuttli, O. W. (1988), Interpretation of High-frequency coda at Large Distances: Stochastic Modeling and Method of Inversion, Geophys. J. Int. 95, 579–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Xie, J., and Mitchell, B. J. (1990a), A Back-projection Method for Imaging Large-scale Lateral Variations of Lg Coda Q with Application to Continental Africa, Geophys. J. Int. 100, 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xie, J., and Mitchell, B. J. (1990b), Attenuation of Multiphase Surface Waves in the Basin and Range Province, Part I: Lg and Lg Coda, Geophys. J. Int. 102, 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xie, J., Cong, L., and Mitchell, B. J. (1996), Spectral Characteristics of the Excitation and Propagation of Lg from Underground Nuclear Explosions in Central Asia, J. Geophys. Res. 101, 5813–5822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zoback, M. L., and Zoback, M. D. (1989), Tectonic stress field of the continental United States. In Geophysical Framework of the Continental United States, Mem. 172 (eds. Pakiser, L. C, and Mooney, W. D.) (Geol. Soc. Am., Boulder, Colorado 1989) pp. 523–539.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel AG 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saadia Baqer
    • 1
    • 2
  • B. J. Mitchell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Earth and Atmospheric SciencesSaint Louis UniversitySt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Earth and Planetary SciencesWashington UniversitySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations