On the essence of “meaningless” simple repetitive DNA in eukaryote genomes

  • C. Epplen
  • G. Melmer
  • I. Siedlaczck
  • F.-W. Schwaiger
  • W. Mäueler
  • J. T. Epplen
Part of the Progress in Systems and Control Theory book series (EXS)

Summary

Various kinds of simple tandemly repetitive DNA sequences are abundantly interspersed in the genomes of practically all eukaryotic species studied. The comparatively elevated mutation rates of simple repeat blocks result in highly polymorphic and therefore extremely informative investigation systems for studies on forensic, ecological and genetic relationship questions. Recently the techniques for analyzing simple repeats have achieved great effectivity and simplicity. Beyond their utility as tools for differentiation and individualization, certain of these repeated elements harbor quite unexpected qualities which may be discussed in the context of their biological meaning. i) A specific subset of simple (cac) n or (gtg) n repeats is expressed in mature mRNA and total cellular RNA. ii) Despite the apparently high mutation rate certain (gt) n or mixed (gt) n /(ga) m stretches of intronic simple repeats are preserved in immunologically relevant genes for at least 70 × 106 years and they bind nuclear protein molecules with high affinities. Consequently in addition to their tool character, the biological aspects of simple repeated DNA should be taken into consideration.

Keywords

Oligonucleotide Probe Simple Repeat Poeciliid Fish Simple Repetitive Sequence Interspersion Pattern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Achmann R, Heller K-G, Epplen JT (1992) Last-male sperm precedence in the bushcricket Poecilimon veluchianus (Orthoptera, Tettigonioidea) demonstrated by DNA fingerprinting. Mol Ecol 1: 47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ammer H, Schwaiger F-W, Kammerbauer C, Arriens A, Lazary S, Epplen JT (1992) Exonic polymorphism versus intronic hypervariability in DRB genes: Evolutionary persistence and group specific organization in simple repeat sequences. Immunogenet 35: 330–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beckmann JS, Weber JL (1992) Survey of human and rat microsatellites. Genomics 12: 627–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bender K, Kasulke D, Mayerova A, Hummel K, Weidinger S, Epplen JT, Wienker TF (1991) A problematical exclusion case involving the PI locus: a multifaceted approach. Hum Hered 41: 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beyermann B, Nürnberg P, Weihe A, Meixner M, Epplen JT, Börner J (1992) Fingerprinting plant genomes with oligonucleotide probes specific for simple repetitive DNA sequences. Theor Appl Genet 83: 691–694Google Scholar
  6. Bock S, Epplen JT, Noll-Puchta H, Rotter M, Höfler H, Block T, Hartung R et al. (1993) Detection of somatic changes in human renal cell carcinomas with oligonucleotide probes specific for simple repeat motifs. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 6: 113–117 Britten RJ, Kohne DE (1968) Repeated sequences in DNA. Science 161: 529-540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Britten RJ, Davidson EH (1973) Organization, transcription and regulation in the animal genome. Quart Rev Biol 48: 565–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chumakov I, Rigault P, Guillou S, Ougen P, Billaut A, Guasconi G, Gervy P et al. (1992) Continuum of overlapping clones spanning the entire human chromosome 21q. Nature 359: 380–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Epplen JT (1988) On simple repeated GATA/GACA sequences in animal genomes: a critical reappraisal. J Hered 79: 409–417Google Scholar
  10. Epplen JT, Ammer H, Epplen C, Kammerbauer C, Roewer L, Schwaiger W, Steimle V et al. (1991) Oligonucleotide fingerprinting using simple repeat motifs: a convenient, ubiquitously applicable method to detect hypervariability for multiple purposes. In: Burke T, Dolf G, Jeffreys AJ, Wolff R (eds) DNA-fingerprinting: Approaches and applications, Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 50–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Epplen JT (1992a) Diagnostic applications of repetitive DNA sequences. Clin Chim Acta 209: 5–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Epplen JT (1992b) The methodology of multilocus DNA fingerprinting using radioactive or nonradioactive oligonucleotide probes specific for simple repeat motifs. In: Chrambach A, Dunn MJ, Radola BJ (eds) Advances in Electrophoresis, VCH, Weinheim, pp 59–112Google Scholar
  13. Epplen JT (1992c) On genetic components in autoimmunity. Hum Genet 90: 331–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Epplen JT, Mathé J (1992) Multilocus DNA fingerprinting using non-radioactively labelled oligonucleotide probes specific for simple repeat elements. In: Kessler C (ed) Non-radioactive labelling, Springer, Berlin, pp 271–277Google Scholar
  15. Epplen C, Epplen JT (1992) The human cDNA sequence homologous to the mouse MHC class I promoter-binding protein gene contains four additional codons in lymphocytes. Mamm Genome 3: 472–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Epplen C, Epplen JT. (cac)n/(gtg)n simple repetitive sequences are rare in mRNA of human lymphocytes. Hum Genet (submitted)Google Scholar
  17. Fisher RA (ed) (1958) The genetical theory of natural selection. Ed. 2, Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Foote S, Vollrath D, Hilton A, Page DC (1992) The human Y chromosome: overlapping DNA clones spanning the euchromatic region. Science 258: 60–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hundrieser J, Nürnberg P, Czeizel A, Métheneki J, Rothgänger S, Foelske C, Zischler H et al. (1992) Characterization of hypervariable, locus specific probes derived from a (CAC)5/ (GTG)5 fingerprint in various Eurasian populations. Hum Genet 90: 27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lubjuhn T, Curio E, Muth S, Brün J, Epplen JT. Parental care in great tits (Parus major) depends on true parentage. Behaviour Ecol (submitted)Google Scholar
  21. Mäueler W, Muller M, Köhne AC, Epplen JT (1992a) A gel retardation assay system for studying protein binding to simple repetitive DNA sequences. Electrophoresis 13: 7–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mäueler W, Frank G, Siedlaczck I, Epplen JT, Melmer G (1992b) PCR amplification products are of limited use for the study of DNA/protein interaction. Electrophoresis 13: 641–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Melmer G, Sood R, Rommens J, Rego D, Tsui LC, Buchwald M (1990) Isolation of clones on chromosome 7 that contain recognition sites for rare-cutting enzymes by oligonucleotide hybridization. Genomics 7: 173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakahori K, Mitani K, Yamada M, Nakagome Y (1986) A human Y-chromosome specific repeated DNA family (DYZ1). Nucleic Acids Res 14: 7569–7580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nanda I, Deubelbeiss C, Guttenbach M, Epplen JT, Schmid M (1990a) Heterogeneities in the distribution of (GACA)n repeats in the karyotypes of primates and mouse. Hum Genet 85: 187–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nanda I, Feichtinger W, Schmid M, Schröder JH, Zischler H, Epplen JT (1990b) Simple repetitive sequences are associated with the differentiation of the sex chromosomes in poeciliid fish. J Molec Evol 30: 456–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nanda I, Schmid M, Epplen JT (1991) In situ hybridization of nonradioactive oligonucleotide probes to chromosomes. In: Adolph KW (ed) Advanced techniques in chromosome research, Dekker, New York, pp 117–134Google Scholar
  28. Nanda I, Schartl M, Feichtinger W, Epplen JT, Schmid M (1992) Early stages of sex chromosome differentiation in fish as analyzed by simple repetitive DNA sequences. Chromosoma 101: 301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nanda I, Schartl M, Epplen JT, Feichtinger W, Schmid M (1993) The primitive sex chromosomes in poeciliid fishes harbour simple repetitive DNA sequences. J Exp Zool 265: 301–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nürnberg P, Zischler H, Fuhrmann E, Thiel G, Losanova T, Kinzel D, Nisch G et al. (1991) Co-amplification of simple repetitive fingerprint fragments and the EGF receptor gene in human gliomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 3: 79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nürnberg P, Thiel G, Weber F, Epplen JT (1993) Changes of telomere lengths in human intracranial tumours. Hum Genet 91: 190–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ohno S (1972) Evolutional reason for having so much junk DNA. In: Pfeiffer RA (ed) Modern aspects of cytogenetics: constitutive heterochromatin in man, FK Schattauer, Stuttgart, pp 169–180Google Scholar
  33. Rieß O, Kammerbauer C, Roewer L, Steimle V, Andreas A, Albert E, Nagai T et al. (1990) Hypervariability of intronic simple (gt)n(ga)m repeats in HLA-DRB1 genes. Immunogenet 32: 110–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roewer L, Arnemann J, Spurr NK, Grzeschik K-H, Epplen JT (1992) Simple repeat sequences on the human Y chromosome are equally polymorphic as their autosomal counterparts. Hum Genet 89: 389–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Santos FR dos, Pena SDJ, Epplen JT (1993) Genetic and population study of a Y-linked tetranucleotide repeat DNA polymorphism with a simple non-isotonic technique. Hum Genet 90: 655–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schäfer R, Böltz E, Becker A, Bartels F, Epplen JT (1986) The expression of the evolutionarily conserved GATA/GACA repeats in mouse tissues. Chromosoma 93: 496–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schartl M, Schlupp I, Schartl A, Meyer MK, Nanda I, Schmid M, Epplen JT et al. (1991) On the stability of dispensable constituents of the eukaryotic genome: stability of coding sequences in a clonal vertebrate, the amazon molly, Poecilia formosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 8759–8763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schartl M, Erbelding-Denk C, Hölter S, Nanda I, Schmid M, Schröder JH, Epplen JT. Reproductive failure of the dominant males in a poeciliid fish species, Limia perugiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (in press)Google Scholar
  39. Schmid M, Guttenbach M, Nanda I, Studer R, Epplen JT (1990) Localization of the 2.1 kb repeat on the human Y chromosome. Genomics 6: 212–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schwaiger F-W, Buitkamp J, Weyers E, Epplen JT (1993) Typing of artiodactyl MHC-DRB genes with the help of intronic simple repeated DNA sequences. Mol Ecol 2: 55–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schwaiger W, Weyers E, Epplen C, Ruff G, Crawford A, Epplen JT. The paradox of MHC-DRB exon/intron evolution: α-helix and β-sheet encoding regions diverge while hypervariable intronic simple repeats co-evolve with β-sheet codons. J Mol Evol (in press)Google Scholar
  42. Shelbourne P, Winqvist R, Kunert E, Davis J, Leisti J, Thiele H, Bachmann H et al. (1992) Unstable DNA may be responsible for the incomplete penetrance of the myotonic dystrophy phenotype. Hum Mol Genet 7: 467–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sutherland GR, Richards RI (1992) Invited editorial: Anticipation legitimized: unstable DNA to the rescue. Am J Hum Genet 51: 7–9Google Scholar
  44. Weising K, Ramser J, Kaemmer D, Kahl G, Epplen JT (1991) Oligonucleotide fingerprinting in plants and fungi. In: Burke T, Dolf G, Jeffreys AJ, Wolff R (eds), DNA-fingerprinting: Approaches and applications, Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 312–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weising K, Kaemmer D, Weigand F, Epplen JT, Kahl G (1992) Oligonucleotide fingerprinting reveals various probe-dependent levels of informativeness in chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Genome 35: 436–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weissenbach J, Gyapay G, Dib C, Vignal A, Morisette J, Millasseau P, Vaysseix G et al. (1992) A second-generation linkage map of the human genome. Nature 359: 794–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zischler H, Nanda I, Schäfer R, Schmid M, Epplen JT (1989) Digoxigenated oligonucleotide probes specific for simple repeats in DNA fingerprinting and hybridization in situ. Hum Genet 82: 227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zischler H, Kammerbauer C, Studer R, Grzeschik K-H, Epplen JT (1992) Dissecting (CAC)5/(GTG)5 fingerprints into individual locus specific, hypervariable components. Genomics 13: 983–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel AG 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Epplen
    • 1
  • G. Melmer
    • 1
  • I. Siedlaczck
    • 1
  • F.-W. Schwaiger
    • 1
  • W. Mäueler
    • 1
  • J. T. Epplen
    • 1
  1. 1.Molecular Human GeneticsRuhr-UniversityGermany

Personalised recommendations