Smallness: gain and loss in plant chromosome research

  • Kiichi Fukui
  • Nobuko Ohmido
  • Toshiyuki Wako

Abstract

Once, a good microscope was the pride of a laboratory in the field of cytology and cytogenetics. Now the situation seems to have completely changed. Biochemical and molecular biological equipment replace the position of microscopes even in the laboratories of cytology and cytogenetics. In this paper, the importance of the visual sense to the study of small plant chromosomes is again demonstrated through typical examples. New methodologies related to visual approaches in chromosome research are also reviewed based on the results obtained mainly in our research group. Smallness is, thus, no longer disadvantageous for chromosome research.

Keywords

Rice Chromosome Telomere Sequence Barley Chromosome Plant Chromosome Pachytene Chromosome 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fukui K (1996) Plant chromosomes at mitosis. In: K Fukui, S Nakayama (eds):Plant Chromosomes Laboratory Methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1–17Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bennett MD, Smith JB (1976) Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms.Phil Trans R Soc Loud B274: 227–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Uozu S, Ikehashi H, Ohmido N et al (1997) Repetitive sequences: cause for variation in genome size and chromosome morphology in the genusOryza. Plant Mol Biol35: 791–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kakeda K, Fukui K, Yamagata H (1991) Heterochromatic differentiation in barley chromosomes revealed by C- and N-banding techniques.TheorAppl Genet81: 144–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miyamoto J, Kurita S, Fukui K (1991) Image analysis of C-banding pattern in two herbsParis tetraphyllaA. Gray and Paris verticillataM. Bieb, (Liliaceae). Jpn J Genet66: 335–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fukui K, Kamisugi Y (1995) Mapping of C-bandedCrepischromosomes by imaging methods.Chromosome Res3: 79–86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yanagisawa T, Tano S, Fukui K et al (1991) Marker chromosomes commonly observed in the genusGlycine. TheorAppl Genet81: 606–612Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Olin-Fatih M (1996) The morphology, cytology, and C-banded karyotypes ofBrassica campestris B. oleracea and B. napus plants regenerated from protoplasts.Theor Appl Genet 93: 414–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Olin-Fatih M, Heneen WK (1992) C-banded karyotypes ofBrassica campestris Brassica oleracea andBrassica napus. Genome 35: 583–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fukui K, Iijima K (1991) Somatic chromosome map of rice by imaging methods.Theor Appl Genet81: 589–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fukui K, Mukai Y (1988) Condensation pattern as a new image parameter for the identification of small chromosomes in plants.Jpn J Genet63: 359–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Iijima K, Fukui K (1991) Clarification of the conditions for the image analysis of plant chromosomes.Bull Natl InstAgrobiol Resource6: 1–58Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kuwada Y (1910) A cytological study ofOryza sativaL.Bot Magazine (Tokyo)26: 267–281Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fukui K Nakayama S, Ohmido N et al (1998) Quantitative karyotyping of three diploidBrassicaspecies by imaging methods and localization of 45S rDNA loci on the identified chromosomes.TheorAppl Genet96: 325–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karpechenko GD (1922) The number of chromosomes and the genetic correlation of cultivated Cruciferae.Bull Appl Bot Genet Plant Breeding13: 3–14Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ha S, Moore PH, Heinz D et al (1999) Quantitative chromosome map of the polyploidSaccharum spontaneumby multicolor fluorescencein situhybridization and imaging methods.Plant Mol Biol39: 1165–1173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Panje RR, Babu CN (1960) Studies inSaccharum spontaneumdistribution and geographical association of chromosome numbers.Cytologia25: 152–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kamisugi Y, Furuya N, Iijima K et al (1993) Computer-aided automatic identification of rice chromosomes by image parameters.Chromosome Res1: 189–196CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fukui K (1986) Standardization of karyotyping plant chromosomes by a newly developed chromosome image analyzing system (CHIAS).TheorAppl Genet72: 27–32Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fukui K (1996) Quantitative chromosome maps as a basis of biosciences. In: PE Brandham and MD Bennett (eds):Kew Chromosome Conference.Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 201–213Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fukui K, Kakeda K (1990) Quantitative karyotyping of barley chromosomes by image analysis methods.Genome33: 450–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fukui K, Kamisugi Y (1991) Simulation of microscopic images by a desktop imaging system. In: M Doyama, T Suzuki, J Kihara, R Yamamoto (eds):Computer Aided Innovation of New Materials.Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 101–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kamisugi Y, Fukui K (1990) Automatic karyotyping of plant chromosomes by imaging techniques.BioTechniques.8: 290–295PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fukui K, Nakayama S (1996) Analysis of chromosome information. In: K Fukui, S Nakayama (eds):Plant Chromosomes Laboratory Methods. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 241–255Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kato S, Fukui K (1998) Condensation pattern (CP) analysis of plant chromosomes using a newly developed chromosome image analyzing system, CHIAS III.Chromosome Res6: 473–479CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kato S, Hirose T, Akiyama Y et al (1997) Manual on the chromosome image analyzing system III, CHIAS III.Research Report on Development of Agriculture at the Hokuriku Area36: 1–76Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kamisugi Y, Nakayama S, O’Neill CN et al (1998) Visualization of theBrassicaself–incompatibility S–locus on identified oilseed rape chromosomes.Plant Mol Biol38: 1043–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ito M, Ohmido N, Akiyama Y et al. Quantitative chromosome map ofArabidopsis thalianaL. by imaging methods;submitted Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fukui K, Iijima K (1992) Manual on rice chromosomes (2nd edition).Miscellaneous Publications of National Institute of Agrobiological Resources4: 1–25Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Iijima K, Kakeda K, Fukui K (1991) Identification and characterization of somatic rice chromosomes by imaging methods.Theor Appl Genet81: 597–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ohtsubo H, Umeda M, Ohtsubo E (1991) Organization of DNA sequences highly repeated in tandem in rice genomes.Jpn J Genet66: 241–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ohmido N, Fukui K (1997) Visual verification of close disposition between a rice A genome-specific DNA sequence (TrsA) and the telomere sequence.Plant Mol Biol35: 963–968CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ohmido N, Kijima K, Akiyama Y et al (2000) Quantification of total genomic DNA and selected repetitive sequences reveal concurrent changes in different DNA families inindicaandjaponicarice.Mol Gen Genet; submitted Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jiang J, Gill B S (1994) Nonisotopicin situhybridization and plant genome mapping: the first 10 years.Genome37: 717–725CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Leitch IJ, Heslop-Harrison JS (1991) Physical mapping of four sites of 5S rDNA sequences and one site of the alfa-amylase-2 gene in barley(Hordeum vulgare). Genome36: 517–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fukui K, Ohmido N, Khush GS (1994) Variability in rDNA loci in genusOryzadetected through fluorescencein situhybridization.Theor Appl Genet87: 893–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ohmido N, Akiyama Y, Fukui K (1998) Systematic mapping of unique nucleotide sequences on identified rice chromosomes.Plant Mol Biol38: 1081–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lawrence JB, Singer RH, McNeil JA (1990) Interphase and metaphase resolution of different distance within the human dystrophin gene.Science249: 928–932CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Van den Engh G, Sachs R, Trask BJ (1992) Estimation genomic distance from DNA sequence location in cell nuclei by a random walk model.Science257: 1410–1412CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhong X, Fransz PF, Wennekes-van Eden J et al (1998) FISH studies reveal the molecular and chromosomal organization of individual telomere domains in tomato.Plant J13: 507–517CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ohmido N, Kijima K, Ashikawa I et al. Visualization of the terminal structure of rice chromosomes using multicolor FISH on chromosomes and extended DNA fibers;submitted Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Fransz PF, Alonso-Blanco C, Liharska TB et al (1996) High resolution physical mapping inArabidopsis thalianaand tomato by fluorescencein situhybridization to extended DNA fibers.Plant J9: 421–430CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Iwano M, Fukui K, Takaichi S et al (1997) Globular and fibrous structure in barley chromosomes reveals by high-resolution scanning electron microscopy.Chromosome Res5: 341–349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ushiki T, Hitomi J, Ogura S et al (1996) Atomic force microscopy in histology and cytology.Arch Histol Cytol59: 421–431CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cremer T, Dietzel S, Elis R et al (1995) Chromosome territories, nuclear matrix filaments and interchromatin channels: a topological view on nuclear architecture and function. In: PE Brandham, MD Bennett (eds):Kew Chromosome Conference IV.Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 63–81Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Montijn MB, ten Hoopen R, Fransz PF et al (1998) Characterization of the nucleolar organising regions during the cell cycle in two varieties ofPetunia hybridaas visualised by fluorescencein situhybridisation and silver staining.Chromosome107: 80–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Noguchi J, Fukui K (1995) Chromatin arrangements in intact interphase nuclei examined by laser confocal microscopy.J Plant Res108: 209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wako T, Fukuda M, Furushima-Shimogawara R et al (1998) Comparative analysis of the topographical distribution of acetylated histone H4 using confocal microscopy and a deconvolution system.Analyt Chim Acta365: 9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Houben A, Wako T, Shimogawara-Furushima R et al. (1999) The cell cycle dependent phosphorylation of histone H3 is correlated with the condensation of plant mitotic chromosomes.Plant J18: 675–680CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sawahel W, Fukui K (1995) Gene cloning in plants: Innovative approaches.BioTechniques19: 106–111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Fukui K, Minezawa M, Kamisugi Y et al (1992) Microdissection of plant chromosomes by argon-ion laser beam.Theor Appl Genet84: 787–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Fukui K, Nomiya A, Nishiguchi M et al (1995) Application of laser optics to plant cell and molecular biology.Zool Stud34 (Suppl. 1) 35–37Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kamisugi Y, Sakai F, Minezawa M et al (1993) Recovery of dissected C-band regions inCrepischromosomes.Theor Appl Genet85: 825–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Nakamura M, Fukui K (1997) A chromosome–oriented approach to genome analysis in a woody plant —Sequoiadendron giganteum(Lindl.) Buchholz. In: Z Borzan, SE Schlarbaum (eds):Cytogenetic Studies of Forest Trees and Shrub Species.University of Zagreb, Croatia, 89–102Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Khush GS, Kinoshita T (1991) Rice karyotype, marker genes, and linkage groups. In: GS Khush, T Kinoshita (eds):Rice Biotechnology.C.A.B. International, Oxon, 83–108Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel AG 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kiichi Fukui
    • 1
  • Nobuko Ohmido
    • 2
  • Toshiyuki Wako
    • 3
  1. 1.Graduate School of EngineeringDepartment of BiotechnologyOsaka, SuitaJapan
  2. 2.Hokuriku National Agricultural Experiment StationLaboratory of Rice Genetic EngineeringJoetsu, NiigataJapan
  3. 3.National Institute of Agrobiological ResourcesGenetic Resources II DepartmentTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations