Optimal Control pp 289-304 | Cite as
Periodic Optimal Trajectories with Singular Control for Aircraft with High Aerodynamic Efficiency
Abstract
Fuel minimum range cruise of aircraft with high aerodynamic efficiency is considered as an optimal periodic control problem. Optimality conditions for trajectories with singular arcs and state variable constraints are derived.
Computation of periodic optimal trajectories in the case addressed presents strong requirements on the numerical algorithm. Computational difficulties become larger when aerodynamic efficiency is increased and wing loading is decreased. The specific nature of the numerical problems encountered and the means used to overcome them are described.
Keywords
Fuel Consumption Singular Control Wing Loading Roundoff Error Aerodynamic EfficiencyNomenclature
- CD
drag coefficient
- CL
lift coefficient
- C*L
lift coefficient at maximum lift/drag ratio
- c
normalized period length
- D
drag
- E
aerodynamic efficiency, E = (C L/C D)max
- g
acceleration due to gravity
- H
Hamiltonian
- h
altitude
- J
performance criterion
- K
factor according to lift dependent drag, C D = C D0 + KC 2 L
- L
lift
- m
mass
- mV
exponent denoting the effect of speed on fuel consumption
- P
propulsive power, P = TV
- S
reference area
- S̄
switching function
- T
thrust
- V
speed
- V*0
speed for best glide ratio at sea level (h = 0)
- x
horizontal coordinate
- y
state variable vector
- γ
flight path angle
- δ
throttle setting
- ε
glide ratio
- λ
Lagrange multiplier
- ϱ
atmospheric density
- σ
fuel consumption factor
- ξ
independent variable
- ξ
a bar denotes a normalized quantity, e.g. V
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Speyer, J.L., “Nonoptimality of the Steady-State Cruise of Aircraft,” AIAA Journal, Vol 14, 1976, pp. 1604–1610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Speyer, J.L., Dannemiller, D., Walker, D., “Periodic Optimal Cruise of an Atmospheric Vehicle,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 8, 1985, pp. 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Gilbert, E.G., “Vehicle Cruise: Improved Fuel Economy by Periodic Control,” Automatica, Vol. 12, 1976, pp. 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Breakwell, J.V., Shoee, H., “Minimum Fuel Flight Paths for Given Range,” AIAA Paper, 1980, No. 80–1660.Google Scholar
- 5.Grimm, W., Well, K.-H., Oberle, H.J., “Periodic Control for Minimum Fuel Aircraft Trajectories”, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 9, 1986, pp. 169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Menon, P.K.A., “Study of Aircraft Cruise,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 12, 1989, pp. 631–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Sachs, G., “Verringerung des Treibstoffverbrauchs durch periodische Optimalflugbahnen,” DGLR Jahrbuch, 1984, 090–1–09–17.Google Scholar
- 8.Sachs, G., Christodoulou, T., “Reducing Fuel Consumption of Subsonic Aircraft by Optimal Cyclic Cruise,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 24, 1987, pp. 616–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Sachs, G., Lesch K., “Fuel Savings by Optimal Aircraft Cruise with Singular and Chattering Control,” Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Springer-Verlag, (1990), pp. 590–599.Google Scholar
- 10.Sachs, G., Lesch K., “Optimal Periodic Cruise with Singular Control,” AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference Proceedings, 1990, pp. 1586–1594.Google Scholar
- 11.ICAO Standard Atmosphere, International Civil Aviation Organization, Montreal, 1964.Google Scholar
- 12.Kumar, R., Kelley, H.J., “Singular Optimal Atmospheric Rocket Trajectories,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 11, 1988, pp. 305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Bock, H.G., “Numerische Behandlung von Zustandsbeschränkten und Chebychef-Steuerungsproblemen,” Course DR 3.10 of the Carl-Cranz-Gesellschaft, Oberpfaf-fenhofen, Germany, 1981.Google Scholar
- 14.Bock, H.G., “Randwertproblemmethoden zur Parameteridentifizierung in Systemen nichtlinearer Differentialgleichungen”, Dissertation, Universität Bonn, 1985, Bonner Mathematische Schriften 183, Bonn, 1987.Google Scholar
- 15.ICAO Standard and Recommended Practices, Operation of Aircraft, Annex 6, 1986.Google Scholar