Aftershocks of the San Marcos Earthquake of April 25, 1989 (Ms = 6.9) and Some Implications for the Acapulco-San Marcos, Mexico, Seismic Potential

  • F. R. Zúñiga
  • C. Gutiérrez
  • E. Nava
  • J. Lermo
  • M. Rodríguez
  • R. Coyoli
Part of the Pageoph Topical Volumes book series (PTV)

Abstract

Aftershock activity following the April 25, 1989 (M S = 6.9) earthquake near San Marcos, Guerrero, Mexico, was monitored by a temporary network installed twelve hours after the mainshock and remaining in operation for one week. Of the 350 events recorded by this temporary array, 103 were selected for further analysis in order to determine spatial characteristics of the aftershock activity. An aftershock area of approximately 780 km2 is delimited by the best quality locations. The area of highest aftershock density lies inside an area delimited by the aftershocks of the latest large event in the region in 1957 (M S = 7.5) and it partially overlaps the zone of maximum intensity of the earlier 1907 (M S = 7.7) shock. Aftershocks also appear to cluster close to the mainshock hypocenter. This clustering agrees with the zone of maximum slip during the mainshock, as previously determined from strong motion records. A low angle Benioff zone is defined by the aftershock hypocenters with a slight tendency for the slab to follow a subhorizontal trajectory after a 110 km distance from the trench axis, a feature which has been observed in the neighboring Guerrero Gap. A composite focal mechanism for events close to the mainshock which also coincides with the zone of largest aftershock density, indicates a thrust fault similar to the mainshock fault plane solution.

The San Marcos event took place in an area which could be considered as a mature seismic gap. Due to the manner in which strain release has been observed to previously occur, the occurrence of a major event, overlapping both the neighboring Guerrero Gap and the San Marcos Gap segments of the Mexican thrust, cannot be overlooked.

Key words

Aftershocks Guerrero seismic gap Mexico subduction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J. G., Singh, S. K., Espindola, J. M., and Yamamoto, J. (1989), Seismic Strain Release in the Mexican Subduction Thrust, Phys. of the Earth and Plan. Int. 58, 307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. G., Bodin, P., Brune, J. N., Prince, J., Singh, S. K., Quaas, R., and Onate, M. (1986), Strong Ground Motion from the Michoacán, México, Earthquake, Science 233, 1043–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Astiz, L., and Kanamori, H. (1984), An Earthquake Doublet in Ometepec, Guerrero, Mexico, Phys. Earth and Plan. Int. 34, 24–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Astiz, L., Kanamori, H., and Eissler, H. (1987), Source Characteristics of Earthquakes in the Michoacán Seismic Gap in Mexico, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 77, 1326–1346.Google Scholar
  5. Böse, E., Villafana, A., and Garcia, J. (1908), El temblor del 14 de abril de 1907, Parergones Inst. Geol. Mex. 2, 135–258.Google Scholar
  6. Chase, C., Menard, H., and Mammerick, J. (1970), Bathymetry of the North Pacific, Charts 1–6, Scripps Institute of Oceanography, Institute of Marine Resources, La Jolla, California.Google Scholar
  7. Eissler, H. K., and McNally, K. C. (1989), Seismicity and Tectonics of the Rivera Plate and Implications for the 1932 Jalisco, Mexico, Earthquake, J. Geophys. Res. 89, 4520–4530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gonzalez-Ruiz, J. R., and McNally, K. C. (1988), Stress Accumulation and Release since 1882 in Ometepec, Guerrero, Mexico: Implications for Failure Mechanisms and Risk Assessments of a Seismic Gap, J. Geophys. Res. 93, 6297–6317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gonzalez-Ruiz, J. R., and McNally, K. C. (1981), Seismic Pattern before the Acapulco, Mexico, Earthquake (Ms= 7.5) of July 28, 1957, EOS Trans., AGU 62, 948.Google Scholar
  10. Habermann, R. E. (1988), Precursory Seismic Quiescence: Past, Present and Future, Pure and Appl. Geophys. 126, 279–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hartzell, S., and Iida, M. (1990), Source Complexity of the 1987 Whittier Narrows, California, Earthquake from the Inversion of Strong Motion Records, J. Geophys. Res. 95, 12475–12485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee, W., and Lahr, J. C. (1978), HYPO 71 (Revised): A Computer Program for Determining Hypocenter, Magnitude and First Motion Pattern of Local Earthquakes, U.S. Geological Survey, Open-File Report, 75–311.Google Scholar
  13. Matumoto, T., Ohtake, M., Latham, G., and Umana, J. (1977), Crustal Structure in Southern Central America, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 67, 121–134.Google Scholar
  14. McCann, W., Nishenko, S. P., Sykes, L. R., and Krause, J. (1979), Seismic Gaps and Plate Tectonics: Seismic Potential for Major Boundaries, Pure and Appl. Geophys. 117, 1082–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McNally, K. C., and Minster, J. B. (1981), Nonuniform Seismic Slip Rates along the Middle America Trench, J. Geophys. Res. 86, 4949–4959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Minster, J. B., and Jordan, T. H. (1978), Present Day Plate Motions, J. Geophys. Res. 83, 5331–5354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nishenko, S. P., and Singh, S. K. (1987), The Acapulco-Ometepec, Mexico, Earthquakes of 1907–1982: Evidence for a Variable Recurrence History, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 77, 1359–1367.Google Scholar
  18. Ponce, L., Pardo, M., Comte, D., and Malavé, G., Spatio-temporal Analysis of the Guerrero Mexico Seismic Gap Seismicity (m > 4.5): A Quiescent Subregion Lasting 14 Years, submitted to Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.Google Scholar
  19. Ponce, L., Gaulon, R., Suárez, G., and Lomas, E. (1992), Geometry and State of Stress of the Downgoing Cocos Plate in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, Mexico, Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 773–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Singh, S. K., and Mortera, F. (1991), Source-time Functions of Large Mexican Subduction Earthquakes, Morphology of the Benioff Zone, and the Extent of the Guerrero Gap, J. Geophys. Res. 96, 21487–21502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Singh, S. K., Ordaz, M., and Nava, E. (1990), Modeling of a Few Moderate Earthquakes Located at the Periphery of the Guerrero Gap Using Near-field Digital Seismograms, EOS Trans., AGU 71.Google Scholar
  22. Singh, S. K., Ordaz, M., Quaas, R., and Mena, E. (1989), Estudio preliminar de lafuente del temblor del 25 de abril de 1989 (Ms= 6.9) a partir de los datos de movimientos fuertes, Sociedad Mexicana de Ingenieria Sismica, Memorias, Reunion Anual, Acapulco.Google Scholar
  23. Singh, S. K., Espindola, J. M., Yamamoto, J., and Havskov, J. (1982), Seismic Potential of the Acapulco-San Marcos Region Along the Mexican Subduction Zone, Geophys. Res. Lett. 9, 633–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Singh, S. K., Astiz, L., and Havskov, J. (1981), Seismic Gaps and Recurrence Periods of Large Earthquakes Along the Mexican Subduction Zone: A Reexamination, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 71, 827–843.Google Scholar
  25. Suárez, G., Monfret, T., Wittlinger, G., and David, C. (1990), Geometry of Subduction and Depth of the Seismogenic Zone in the Guerrero Gap, Mexico, Nature 345, 336–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Suárez, G., Ligorria, J. P., and Ponce, L. (1992), Preliminary Crustal Structure of the Coast of Guerrero, Mexico Using the Minimum Apparent Velocity of Refracted Waves, Geofis. Int. 31, 247–252.Google Scholar
  27. Wald, D. J., Helmberger, D. V., and Heaton, T. H. (1991), Rupture Model of the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake from the Inversion of Strong-motion and Broadband Teleseismic Data, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 81, 1540–1572.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel AG 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. R. Zúñiga
    • 1
  • C. Gutiérrez
    • 2
  • E. Nava
    • 3
  • J. Lermo
    • 3
  • M. Rodríguez
    • 3
  • R. Coyoli
    • 3
  1. 1.Instituto de GeofísicaUNAM, Cd. UniversitariaMéxico
  2. 2.Centro Nacional de Prevención de DesastresMéxico
  3. 3.Instituto de IngenieríaUNAM, Cd. UniversitariaMéxico

Personalised recommendations