Principal Horizontal Stresses in Southern Africa

  • N. C. Gay
Part of the Contributions to Current Research in Geophysics (CCRG) book series (CCRG)

Abstract

A review of in situ stress measurements at eight regional localities in Africa south of the 15°S parallel shows that average directions of the horizontal principal stresses are N—S and E—W. These directions agree with principal stress orientations deduced from earthquake fault plane solutions. However, the maximum and minimum principal horizontal stresses are not consistently oriented parallel to either the N—S or E—W direction; they may vary within an individual region because of local geological structures and from region to region. At the sites within the Witwatersrand sediments (all at depths greater than 500 m) the maximum stress tends to lie NW—SE but at three of the four sites outside the Witwatersrand sediments (all at depths less than 500 m) this stress is oriented approximately N—S.

The data reported here are compared with horizontal stresses predicted for Southern Africa by Solomon, Sleep and Richardson (1975) from various plate tectonic driving force models. The agreement between orientations is fair for all sites but only the deép sites in the Witwatersrand sediments have comparable stress magnitudes.

Key words

Stress in-situ Intraplate stress field Tectonics of Africa 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cahnbley, H. (1970), Grundlagenuntersuchungen über das Entspannungsbohrverfahren während des praktischen Einsatzes in grosser Tiefe. Dissertation, Technical University of Clausthal, Germany.Google Scholar
  2. Gay, N. C. (1975), In-situ stress measurements in Southern Africa, Tectonophysics, 29, 447–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Green, R. W. E. and McGarr, A. (1972), A comparison of the focal mechanism and aftershock distribution of the Ceres, South African earthquake of September 29, 1969, Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer. 62, 869–871.Google Scholar
  4. Jaeger, J. C. and Cook, N. G. W., Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics (Methuen, London 1969), 513 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Leeman, E. R. (1968), The determination of the complete state of stress in rock in a single borehole — Laboratory and underground measurements, Int. J. Rock Mech. Mining Sci. 5, 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Maasha, N. and Molnar, P. (1972), Earthquake fault parameters and tectonics in Africa, J. Geophys. Res. 77, 5731–5743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Salamon, M. D. G., Ryder, J. A., and Ortlepp, W. D. (1964), An analogue solution for determining the elastic response of strata surrounding tabular mining excavations, J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 65, 115–137.Google Scholar
  8. Solomon, S. C., Sleep, N. H., and Richardson, R. N. (1975), On the forces driving plate tectonics: Inferences from absolute plate velocities and intraplate stress, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 42, 769–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. van Heerden, W. L. (1974), Additional rock stress measurements at the Ruacana Power Station, S.W.A., Rep. Counc. Sci. Ind. Res. S. Afr., no. ME 1324.Google Scholar
  10. van Heerden, W. L. and Orr, C. M. (1974), Rock stress measurements at the Ruacana Power Station, S.W.A., Rep. Counc. Sci. Ind. Res. S. Afr. no. ME 1311.Google Scholar
  11. Viljoen, R. P., Viljoen, M. J., Grootenboer, J. and Longshaw, T. G. (1975), ERTS — 1 imagery: applications in geology and mineral exploration, Min. Sci. Engng. 7, 132–168.Google Scholar
  12. Voight, B. (1966), Beziehung zwischen grossen horizontalen Spannungen im Gebirge und der Tektonik und der Abstragung, Ist. Congr. Int. Soc. Rock Mech., Lisbon, 1966, Proc. 2, 51–56.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Basel AG 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. C. Gay
    • 1
  1. 1.Bernard Price Institute of Geophysical ResearchUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations